The disaster of the Nazi-power in science as reflected by some leading journals and scientists in physics - A bibliometric study

Manuel Cardona; Werner Marx

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · physics/0411246

The disaster of the Nazi-power in science as reflected by some leading journals and scientists in physics - A bibliometric study

Manuel Cardona·Werner Marx

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The consequences of the Nazi-power for the scientific process are described qualitatively in various articles and books. However, recent progress in information systems allows a quantitative reflection. Literature databases ranging back to the beginning of the 20th century, the ISI citation indexes ranging back to 1945 now and sophisticated search systems are suitable tools for this purpose. In this study the overall break in the scientific productivity and that of selected physical journals are examined. An overview of the citation impact of some 50 leading physicists is given. The productivity before and after departure is analyzed and connected to biographical data.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Manuel Cardona, Werner Marx. 2004-12-06. The disaster of the Nazi-power in science as reflected by some leading journals and scientists in physics - A bibliometric study. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0411246

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Search for the Top Quark

The discovery of the top quark in 1995 completed the roster of the matter particles, quarks and leptons, expected in the Standard Model and in many of its suggested extensions. However, the top quark does not conform to the pattern set by its sister quarks and has come to be a critical component of the ongoing searches for physics beyond the prevailing paradigm. (Prepared for the Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics, CERN, Nov. 2025.)

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

Holistic Versus Fragmented Multiverses: Empirical Access via Causal and Grounding Signatures

Several objections have been raised against the scientificity of multiverse scenarios. This chapter defends the scientificity of certain multiverse scenarios by distinguishing fragmented from holistic multiverses. Concepts of multiverse used in physics are almost always holistic: they embed universes within a broader, unifying physical or metaphysical multiversal structure that can, in principle, leave empirical signatures inside the universes. I develop a classification of such signatures and show how it applies to a number of scenarios from quantum theory, cosmology, and string theory. The framework clarifies why objections such as the `this universe' objection and a newly articulated generalization, the epistemic isolation objection, fail against scientifically motivated multiverses.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

The search for the Higgs Boson and the EBH mechanism

The searches for the Higgs boson at LEP and the Tevatron between 1980 and 2000 are set in the context of the underlying theory of spontaneous symmetry breaking and early phenomenological studies. The evolution of direct searches at LEP and the Tevatron are reviewed, as well as indirect constraints from precision electroweak data. Finally, the state of play in 2000 is summarised, together with the perspectives it offered for later searches.

physics.hist-ph↗