arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.06356

EEGDash Corpus: A Training-Ready Public Corpus for EEG Foundation Models

Abstract

Foundation models for electroencephalography (EEG) are pretrained on tens of thousands of hours of recordings, and their accuracy grows with that amount. Such data is hard to assemble. The largest sources are clinical archives that cannot be redistributed, and the public sources are spread over several archives, file formats, and licences. We release eegdash-corpus-v0, a training-ready corpus of 77 public EEG datasets, as the gated Hugging Face dataset EEGDash/eegdash-corpus-v0 with the SHA-256 of every file. REVE, the largest published EEG foundation model, names 89 datasets as its pretraining corpus. Twelve cannot be redistributed: four clinical archives that hold 82% of its hours, and eight under no-derivatives licences. The corpus holds the 76 others that REVE's sampling rate allows and one more from REVE's release card: 77 datasets, 14,075 hours from 7,272 subjects, 5.0 million 10-second samples and 6.21 billion tokens per epoch. Every dataset is fetched through EEGDash, converted once with REVE's recipe, and stored in its own buckets of a chunked Zarr store with its licence recorded beside it, so a model can train on the whole store or on any subset of datasets. To test that the store pretrains a model, we retrain REVE-Base from scratch twice with the authors' code, changed only in how it reads data, and score it on seven public OpenEEGBench tasks. It reaches 0.331 under linear probing and 0.273 after fine-tuning, against 0.333 and 0.325 for the released model and 0.200 and 0.205 for an untrained encoder. The converter, the conversion reports, and the loader changes are released with the corpus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kuber Shahi, Bruno Aristimunha, Arnaud Delorme. 2026-11-04. EEGDash Corpus: A Training-Ready Public Corpus for EEG Foundation Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

B-XAIC Dataset: Benchmarking Explainable AI for Graph Neural Networks Using Chemical Data

Understanding the reasoning behind deep learning model predictions is crucial in cheminformatics and drug discovery, where molecular design determines their properties. However, current evaluation frameworks for Explainable AI (XAI) in this domain often rely on artificial datasets or simplified tasks, employing data-derived metrics that fail to capture the complexity of real-world scenarios and lack a direct link to explanation faithfulness. To address this, we introduce B-XAIC, a novel benchmark constructed from real-world molecular data and diverse tasks with known ground-truth rationales for assigned labels. Through a comprehensive evaluation using B-XAIC, we reveal limitations of existing XAI methods for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in the molecular domain. This benchmark provides a valuable resource for gaining deeper insights into the faithfulness of XAI, facilitating the development of more reliable and interpretable models.

cs.LG↗

Machine Learning Algorithms for Improving Black Box Optimization Solvers

Black-box optimization (BBO) addresses problems where objectives are accessible only through costly queries without gradients or explicit structure. Classical derivative-free methods---line search, direct search, and model-based solvers such as Bayesian optimization---form the backbone of BBO, yet often struggle in high-dimensional, noisy, or mixed-integer settings. Recent advances use machine learning (ML) and reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance BBO: ML provides expressive surrogates, adaptive updates, meta-learning-based algorithm selection, and generative models, while the RL--BBO interface includes dynamic operator configuration, robust policy search, and meta-optimization across tasks. This paper surveys these developments, covering representative algorithms such as the modular model-based optimization framework (mlrMBO), zeroth-order adaptive momentum methods (ZO-AdaMM), automated BBO (ABBO), distributed block-wise optimization (DiBB), partition-based Bayesian optimization (SPBOpt), the transformer-based optimizer (B2Opt), diffusion-model-based BBO, surrogate-assisted RL for differential evolution (Surr-RLDE), robust BBO (RBO), coordinate-ascent MORE with step size adaptation (CAS-MORE), log-barrier stochastic gradient descent (LB-SGD), policy improvement with black-box (PIBB), and offline Q-learning with Mamba backbones (Q-Mamba). We further review benchmark efforts such as the NeurIPS 2020 BBO Challenge and the MetaBox framework. A controlled numerical study further confirms that ML-based candidate screening can improve the evaluation-budget performance of direct search and differential evolution, while the benefit remains solver-dependent.

cs.LG↗

HomID : Benchmarking Intrinsic Dimension Estimators on Homogenous Manifolds with Anisotropic Embeddings

The manifold hypothesis suggests that data lies on manifolds with smaller intrinsic dimension (ID) than their ambient dimension. However there is no empirical agreement on the estimates for ID from different estimators for realistic datasets. Thus it is important to test ID estimators (IDEs) with targeted stressors. In this work, we consider the role of anisotropy. To this end, we propose HomID, a collection of homogeneous spaces with anisotropic embedding, for benchmarking ID estimators. We observe that methods that perform well on standard benchmarks systematically degrade on HomID under identical resource allocation. We further observe that anisotropic distortion of such benchmarks also results in performance degradation. Finally, we demonstrate that controlled anisotropic distortions induce systematic shifts in the distributions on which these methods rely, providing a concrete mechanism for the resulting estimation errors in two particular IDEs. The code for the project is available at https://github.com/a-writes-code/homid

cs.LG↗