arXiv subjects

Bruno Aristimunha

Publications and source records attributed to Bruno Aristimunha.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

EEGDash Corpus: A Training-Ready Public Corpus for EEG Foundation Models

Foundation models for electroencephalography (EEG) are pretrained on tens of thousands of hours of recordings, and their accuracy grows with that amount. Such data is hard to assemble. The largest sources are clinical archives that cannot be redistributed, and the public sources are spread over several archives, file formats, and licences. We release eegdash-corpus-v0, a training-ready corpus of 77 public EEG datasets, as the gated Hugging Face dataset EEGDash/eegdash-corpus-v0 with the SHA-256 of every file. REVE, the largest published EEG foundation model, names 89 datasets as its pretraining corpus. Twelve cannot be redistributed: four clinical archives that hold 82% of its hours, and eight under no-derivatives licences. The corpus holds the 76 others that REVE's sampling rate allows and one more from REVE's release card: 77 datasets, 14,075 hours from 7,272 subjects, 5.0 million 10-second samples and 6.21 billion tokens per epoch. Every dataset is fetched through EEGDash, converted once with REVE's recipe, and stored in its own buckets of a chunked Zarr store with its licence recorded beside it, so a model can train on the whole store or on any subset of datasets. To test that the store pretrains a model, we retrain REVE-Base from scratch twice with the authors' code, changed only in how it reads data, and score it on seven public OpenEEGBench tasks. It reaches 0.331 under linear probing and 0.273 after fine-tuning, against 0.333 and 0.325 for the released model and 0.200 and 0.205 for an untrained encoder. The converter, the conversion reports, and the loader changes are released with the corpus.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

EEGDash: An open-source platform for machine learning on public neurophysiological data

Public recordings of electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), intracranial EEG (iEEG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electromyography (EMG) are easy to find and hard to train on. Turning a deposit into model input still means writing download, parsing, repair and windowing code for each dataset, and a dataset that meets a metadata standard can still fail to load. EEGDash is an open-source registry over public Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) datasets from the OpenNeuro and NEMAR archives and from local deposits. Each dataset becomes a Python class; format defects are repaired lazily; signal handling, windowing and format checking are delegated to MNE-Python, Braindecode and the official BIDS validator. Semantic search, a web browser, publication-derived dataset tags and a feature-extraction module share the registry. EEGDash indexes the metadata of 892 public BIDS datasets (43,911 participants and 126,672 hours across the five modalities), loads any of them into a PyTorch dataset without custom data-loading code, and shows on 503 OpenNeuro EEG datasets that passing the BIDS validator does not predict whether a dataset loads (Spearman $ρ= -0.05$), so an archive built for machine learning has to track both.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

Scaling Laws for EEG Decoding: How Much Data Is Enough?

Deep learning has become a cornerstone of EEG-based brain decoding, with a growing number of architectures proposed every day. However, how the performance of these different models scales with data volume is not clear. Although this relationship has been characterized in other fields under the name of scaling laws, it remains poorly understood in the EEG domain. The present study addresses this gap by investigating how scan time and subject diversity affect the performance of different architectures. We evaluated five models across four EEG datasets. Training data volume was controlled by varying both subject count and trial volume under cross-subject validation. We then fitted power-law relationships to characterize the resulting behavior. Our findings reveal that as total data volume increases, the distinction between trial and subject scaling becomes largely irrelevant. Furthermore, we show that power-law relationships are both model and dataset-specific, yet they provide a robust descriptive framework for EEG decoding performance. Extrapolation to larger subject pools yields RMSE values below 0.1 in most cases. Our work contributes to the literature by providing a descriptive framework for data scaling in EEG and by demonstrating data-efficient experimental design in EEG research.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

What masking geometry works best for EEG foundation models?

EEG foundation models hold promise for scalable brain-signal decoding across clinical and cognitive neuroscience applications, yet their pre-training pipelines remain poorly understood. Among design choices, the masking strategy is particularly critical: it determines what the network must predict and from which context. Yet it has never been ablated in isolation, as each new model bundles a new masking strategy with a new backbone and objective. In this paper, we formalize the design choices for spatio-temporal masking strategies and train various models with a single pipeline under varying masking configurations across two SSL frameworks (MAE and JEPA). We then systematically evaluate the resulting 58 pre-trained models on the 12 datasets of OpenEEGBench under a linear probe. Both frameworks agree on an optimal masking configuration and on shared failure modes. Outside these, performance is robust: 11 MAE and 9 JEPA configurations are statistically indistinguishable from the best. We further identify a novel JEPA-specific failure mode, tagged bias-inflation collapse, invisible to standard detectors. With a well-chosen mask, our pipeline reaches REVE-level downstream performance at a fraction of REVE's pre-training compute.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Neuron-Level Architecture Growth: A Controlled Evaluation for EEG Time-Series Decoding

Convolutional EEG decoders are trained at a fixed width, usually set by their authors on other data. Growing methods add neurons during training where the loss could decrease the most, but whether they improve compared to a reference width is untested on EEG. Here, we grow three convolutional backbones on 12 motor-imagery datasets under three protocols and compare each with its reference model per subject. The growing ShallowFBCSPNet scores 2.9 points above its reference model with only half the parameters (0.57x), SCCNet changes by at most 1.2 points. Deep4Net growing models show decreased accuracy, but they require adaptation that prevent to compare faithfully the results. These differences follow the selection step, which keeps a candidate neuron relying on a dynamic threshold from singular values decomposition. Overall, these results suggest that growth helps when its criterion can rank the candidate neurons, and that the rate of skipped neuron addition tells where a decoder can be grown small from scratch.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

Automated Artifact Removal in EEG Age Prediction: A systematic comparison

Automated EEG artifact removal may improve downstream analysis but can also alter predictive information. We benchmarked nine automated artifact removal methods against a common no-artifact-removal baseline for cross-dataset EEG age prediction. We introduce Signal Quality Index (SQI)-guided GEDAI, which leverages local signal-quality assessment to restrict correction to the channel--epoch pairs requiring intervention. Three deep neural architectures were trained on TUEG and evaluated without target-domain fitting on ds005385, LEMON, and TDBRAIN. Across this setting, GEDAI and SQI-guided GEDAI were the only methods with consistent gains over baseline in age prediction performance across all datasets and architectures ($Δ$MAE $=-0.77/-0.64$ years, $ΔR^2=+0.083/+0.072$, respectively). The remaining methods were neutral or detrimental on average ($Δ$MAE $=+0.22\pm0.16$ years, $ΔR^2=-0.023\pm0.016$ across methods). The two GEDAI-based methods achieved closely matched performance, while SQI guidance reduced the median modification ratio from $74.78\%$ to $42.80\%$. These findings show that curation benefits are method-dependent and establish SQI guidance as a more selective operating point, leaving more of the original EEG unchanged and limiting the potential loss of neural activity while retaining most of GEDAI's predictive benefit.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

Learning aligned EEG representations with subject-specific encoders

Cross-subject EEG decoding promises more training data, but it also exposes neural networks to strong inter-subject distribution shifts. We study whether task supervision and architecture alone can learn subject-aligned representations. We replace a shared EEG encoder with subject-specific encoders followed by a common classifier, and compare this hybrid model with standard EEGNet, AttentionBaseNet, and CTNet baselines with Euclidean Alignment (EA) on three motor-imagery datasets and one motor-execution dataset. EA improves shared encoders by recentering subject covariances, whereas the hybrid encoder reduces reliance on EA: removing EA has little effect on validation-loss dynamics or latent-space organization, and both hybrid variants consistently outperform non-aligned shared baselines. Subject-specific heads increase class distinctiveness and place each subject close to its own latent manifold while improving within-subject class separation. However, on cross-subject classification, subject-specific heads hinder direct parameter transfer to unseen subjects, motivating quantitative head selection and a brief calibration session. Although decoding gains depend on the dataset and backbone, our main findings concern that the sole use of architecture pressure promotes representation learning and alignment in a direction complementary to domain adaptation methods such as Euclidean Alignment. A per-subject low-rank adapter of only 2Cr parameters recover the full encoder's accuracy across five backbones and ranks $r=1$ to 16, so the per-subject module can be compressed by two to three orders of magnitude.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

EEG Foundation Challenge: From Cross-Task to Cross-Subject EEG Decoding

Current electroencephalogram (EEG) decoding models are typically trained on small numbers of subjects performing a single task. Here, we introduce a large-scale, code-submission-based competition comprising two challenges. First, the Transfer Challenge asks participants to build and test a model that can zero-shot decode new tasks and new subjects from their EEG data. Second, the Psychopathology factor prediction Challenge asks participants to infer subject measures of mental health from EEG data. For this, we use an unprecedented, multi-terabyte dataset of high-density EEG signals (128 channels) recorded from over 3,000 child to young adult subjects engaged in multiple active and passive tasks. We provide several tunable neural network baselines for each of these two challenges, including a simple network and demographic-based regression models. Developing models that generalise across tasks and individuals will pave the way for ML network architectures capable of adapting to EEG data collected from diverse tasks and individuals. Similarly, predicting mental health-relevant personality trait values from EEG might identify objective biomarkers useful for clinical diagnosis and design of personalised treatment for psychological conditions. Ultimately, the advances spurred by this challenge could contribute to the development of computational psychiatry and useful neurotechnology, and contribute to breakthroughs in both fundamental neuroscience and applied clinical research.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

SPD Learn: A Geometric Deep Learning Python Library for Neural Decoding Through Trivialization

Implementations of symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrix-based neural networks for neural decoding remain fragmented across research codebases and Python packages. Existing implementations often employ ad hoc handling of manifold constraints and non-unified training setups, which hinders reproducibility and integration into modern deep-learning workflows. To address this gap, we introduce SPD Learn, a unified and modular Python package for geometric deep learning with SPD matrices. SPD Learn provides core SPD operators and neural-network layers, including numerically stable spectral operators, and enforces Stiefel/SPD constraints via trivialization-based parameterizations. This design enables standard backpropagation and optimization in unconstrained Euclidean spaces while producing manifold-constrained parameters by construction. The package also offers reference implementations of representative SPDNet-based models and interfaces with widely used brain computer interface/neuroimaging toolkits and modern machine-learning libraries (e.g., MOABB, Braindecode, Nilearn, and SKADA), facilitating reproducible benchmarking and practical deployment.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

EEGPrep: a validated Python implementation of the EEGLAB preprocessing pipeline

Objective. Automated EEG preprocessing is common in research and clinical work, but few pipelines have been tested systematically. In a recent benchmark, the default EEGLAB pipeline was the only pipeline that significantly outperformed simple high pass filtering. Its MATLAB implementation, however, complicates deployment in Python and cloud workflows. We developed EEGPrep to reproduce this pipeline in Python while supporting BIDS data. The main technical problem was numerical: small floating point differences can accumulate during recursive filtering and ICA. Approach. EEGPrep covers the default EEGLAB workflow: average rereferencing, artifact removal with the clean rawdata plugin, Picard ICA, ICLabel component classification, channel interpolation, and epoching. We compared each stage with MATLAB reference output on ARM arm64, the primary analysis, and Intel x86 64, the supplementary analysis. The test dataset contained 64 channel P300 auditory oddball recordings from 13 participants. We measured maximum absolute difference, RMS error, AMARI distance for ICA, and agreement between ICLabel decisions. Main Results. On ARM arm64, import and rereferencing matched exactly for all 12 analysed subjects. The clean rawdata and Picard ICA stages remained at numerical zero, with maximum RMS equal to 1.5 x 10^-12 microvolts, AMARI distance less than or equal to 0.000001, and mean correlation equal to 1.000. ICLabel neural network inference introduced the only measurable difference, with maximum RMS equal to 2.0 x 10^-5 microvolts. Rejection decisions nevertheless agreed for every subject, and the difference did not increase through interpolation and epoching, with end to end maximum RMS less than or equal to 2.1 x 10^-5 microvolts. The Intel x86 64 analysis matched to the same precision. Significance. EEGPrep reproduces the validated EEGLAB pipeline and can be installed from PyPI or run in Docker.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

From EEG Cleaning to Decoding: The Role of Artifact Rejection in MI-based BCIs

Motor imagery (MI) BCIs are sensitive to EEG artifacts, yet the practical impact of automated artifact rejection on downstream MI decoding performance remains unclear. While most work focuses on decoder design, the contribution of data curation, particularly automated rejection policies, has received comparatively less attention, despite its importance for robust machine learning pipelines. Here, we propose Fast Automatic Artifact Rejection (FAAR), a lightweight method that computes a compact set of artifact-sensitive features, derives an epoch-level Signal Quality Index, adaptively selects rejection thresholds, and automatically rejects contaminated epochs without requiring prior knowledge of artifact types or manual threshold tuning. We evaluate FAAR on 13 publicly available MI datasets and compare it to a no-rejection baseline, AutoReject, and Isolation Forest. We show rejection effects are strongly subject- and regime-dependent, with the largest gains in low-baseline/low-SNR conditions, so it should be used adaptively. FAAR reduces inter-subject performance variability, an important property for MI-BCI reliability and BCI-illiteracy, without aggressive data removal. Finally, FAAR's lightweight and fully automated thresholding yields consistent rejection behavior across offline curation, training, and online filtering, and supports real-time BCI constraints.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

Channel Adaptation for EEG Foundation Models: A Systematic Benchmark Across Architectures, Tasks, and Training Regimes

Scaling EEG foundation models requires pooling data across heterogeneous electrode montages, a prerequisite both for larger pretraining corpora and for downstream deployment. We present the first systematic comparison of four channel adaptation methods (Conv1d projection, spherical spline interpolation (SSI), source-space decomposition, and Riemannian re-centering) across five pretrained EEG foundation models (5M--157M parameters), five downstream tasks, and two training regimes with 10--15 random seeds each. We find that rigid-montage models (BENDR, Neuro-GPT) require external adaptation, while flexible models (EEGPT, CBraMod) match or exceed it natively when fine-tuned but benefit from external methods under frozen-encoder deployment. A probe-SFT asymmetry exists: external adaptation can cause severe negative transfer during fine-tuning of flexible models. The optimal method is architecture-dependent (Conv1d for BENDR, SSI/Riemannian for Neuro-GPT, source-space decomposition for depression detection), and 5M-parameter CBraMod outperforms models up to 31$\times$ larger on 4/5 datasets, consistent with independent findings that compact EEG-specific architectures can match larger models.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Fine-Tuning Strategies for Continual Online EEG Motor Imagery Decoding: Insights from a Large-Scale Longitudinal Study

This study investigates continual fine-tuning strategies for deep learning in online longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) motor imagery (MI) decoding within a causal setting involving a large user group and multiple sessions per participant. We are the first to explore such strategies across a large user group, as longitudinal adaptation is typically studied in the single-subject setting with a single adaptation strategy, which limits the ability to generalize findings. First, we examine the impact of different fine-tuning approaches on decoder performance and stability. Building on this, we integrate online test-time adaptation (OTTA) to adapt the model during deployment, complementing the effects of prior fine-tuning. Our findings demonstrate that fine-tuning that successively builds on prior subject-specific information improves both performance and stability, while OTTA effectively adapts the model to evolving data distributions across consecutive sessions, enabling calibration-free operation. These results offer valuable insights and recommendations for future research in longitudinal online MI decoding and highlight the importance of combining domain adaptation strategies for improving BCI performance in real-world applications. Clinical Relevance: Our investigation enables more stable and efficient long-term motor imagery decoding, which is critical for neurorehabilitation and assistive technologies.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Geometric Neural Network based on Phase Space for BCI-EEG decoding

Objective: The integration of Deep Learning (DL) algorithms on brain signal analysis is still in its nascent stages compared to their success in fields like Computer Vision. This is particularly true for BCI, where the brain activity is decoded to control external devices without requiring muscle control. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a widely adopted choice for designing BCI systems due to its non-invasive and cost-effective nature and excellent temporal resolution. Still, it comes at the expense of limited training data, poor signal-to-noise, and a large variability across and within-subject recordings. Finally, setting up a BCI system with many electrodes takes a long time, hindering the widespread adoption of reliable DL architectures in BCIs outside research laboratories. To improve adoption, we need to improve user comfort using, for instance, reliable algorithms that operate with few electrodes. Approach: Our research aims to develop a DL algorithm that delivers effective results with a limited number of electrodes. Taking advantage of the Augmented Covariance Method and the framework of SPDNet, we propose the Phase-SPDNet architecture and analyze its performance and the interpretability of the results. The evaluation is conducted on 5-fold cross-validation, using only three electrodes positioned above the Motor Cortex. The methodology was tested on nearly 100 subjects from several open-source datasets using the Mother Of All BCI Benchmark (MOABB) framework. Main results: The results of our Phase-SPDNet demonstrate that the augmented approach combined with the SPDNet significantly outperforms all the current state-of-the-art DL architecture in MI decoding. Significance: This new architecture is explainable and with a low number of trainable parameters.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2024

A Systematic Evaluation of Euclidean Alignment with Deep Learning for EEG Decoding

Electroencephalography (EEG) signals are frequently used for various Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) tasks. While Deep Learning (DL) techniques have shown promising results, they are hindered by the substantial data requirements. By leveraging data from multiple subjects, transfer learning enables more effective training of DL models. A technique that is gaining popularity is Euclidean Alignment (EA) due to its ease of use, low computational complexity, and compatibility with Deep Learning models. However, few studies evaluate its impact on the training performance of shared and individual DL models. In this work, we systematically evaluate the effect of EA combined with DL for decoding BCI signals. We used EA to train shared models with data from multiple subjects and evaluated its transferability to new subjects. Our experimental results show that it improves decoding in the target subject by 4.33% and decreases convergence time by more than 70%. We also trained individual models for each subject to use as a majority-voting ensemble classifier. In this scenario, using EA improved the 3-model ensemble accuracy by 3.7%. However, when compared to the shared model with EA, the ensemble accuracy was 3.62% lower.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2024

Combining Euclidean Alignment and Data Augmentation for BCI decoding

Automated classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is complex due to their high dimensionality, non-stationarity, low signal-to-noise ratio, and variability between subjects. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown promising results for EEG classification, but the above challenges hinder their performance. Euclidean Alignment (EA) and Data Augmentation (DA) are two promising techniques for improving DNN training by permitting the use of data from multiple subjects, increasing the data, and regularizing the available data. In this paper, we perform a detailed evaluation of the combined use of EA and DA with DNNs for EEG decoding. We trained individual models and shared models with data from multiple subjects and showed that combining EA and DA generates synergies that improve the accuracy of most models and datasets. Also, the shared models combined with fine-tuning benefited the most, with an overall increase of 8.41\% in classification accuracy.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2024

Alljoined1 -- A dataset for EEG-to-Image decoding

We present Alljoined1, a dataset built specifically for EEG-to-Image decoding. Recognizing that an extensive and unbiased sampling of neural responses to visual stimuli is crucial for image reconstruction efforts, we collected data from 8 participants looking at 10,000 natural images each. We have currently gathered 46,080 epochs of brain responses recorded with a 64-channel EEG headset. The dataset combines response-based stimulus timing, repetition between blocks and sessions, and diverse image classes with the goal of improving signal quality. For transparency, we also provide data quality scores. We publicly release the dataset and all code at https://linktr.ee/alljoined1.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2024

The largest EEG-based BCI reproducibility study for open science: the MOABB benchmark

Objective. This study conduct an extensive Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) reproducibility analysis on open electroencephalography datasets, aiming to assess existing solutions and establish open and reproducible benchmarks for effective comparison within the field. The need for such benchmark lies in the rapid industrial progress that has given rise to undisclosed proprietary solutions. Furthermore, the scientific literature is dense, often featuring challenging-to-reproduce evaluations, making comparisons between existing approaches arduous. Approach. Within an open framework, 30 machine learning pipelines (separated into raw signal: 11, Riemannian: 13, deep learning: 6) are meticulously re-implemented and evaluated across 36 publicly available datasets, including motor imagery (14), P300 (15), and SSVEP (7). The analysis incorporates statistical meta-analysis techniques for results assessment, encompassing execution time and environmental impact considerations. Main results. The study yields principled and robust results applicable to various BCI paradigms, emphasizing motor imagery, P300, and SSVEP. Notably, Riemannian approaches utilizing spatial covariance matrices exhibit superior performance, underscoring the necessity for significant data volumes to achieve competitive outcomes with deep learning techniques. The comprehensive results are openly accessible, paving the way for future research to further enhance reproducibility in the BCI domain. Significance. The significance of this study lies in its contribution to establishing a rigorous and transparent benchmark for BCI research, offering insights into optimal methodologies and highlighting the importance of reproducibility in driving advancements within the field.

eess.SP↗