arXiv subjects

Arnaud Delorme

Publications and source records attributed to Arnaud Delorme.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

EEGDash Corpus: A Training-Ready Public Corpus for EEG Foundation Models

Foundation models for electroencephalography (EEG) are pretrained on tens of thousands of hours of recordings, and their accuracy grows with that amount. Such data is hard to assemble. The largest sources are clinical archives that cannot be redistributed, and the public sources are spread over several archives, file formats, and licences. We release eegdash-corpus-v0, a training-ready corpus of 77 public EEG datasets, as the gated Hugging Face dataset EEGDash/eegdash-corpus-v0 with the SHA-256 of every file. REVE, the largest published EEG foundation model, names 89 datasets as its pretraining corpus. Twelve cannot be redistributed: four clinical archives that hold 82% of its hours, and eight under no-derivatives licences. The corpus holds the 76 others that REVE's sampling rate allows and one more from REVE's release card: 77 datasets, 14,075 hours from 7,272 subjects, 5.0 million 10-second samples and 6.21 billion tokens per epoch. Every dataset is fetched through EEGDash, converted once with REVE's recipe, and stored in its own buckets of a chunked Zarr store with its licence recorded beside it, so a model can train on the whole store or on any subset of datasets. To test that the store pretrains a model, we retrain REVE-Base from scratch twice with the authors' code, changed only in how it reads data, and score it on seven public OpenEEGBench tasks. It reaches 0.331 under linear probing and 0.273 after fine-tuning, against 0.333 and 0.325 for the released model and 0.200 and 0.205 for an untrained encoder. The converter, the conversion reports, and the loader changes are released with the corpus.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

EEGDash: An open-source platform for machine learning on public neurophysiological data

Public recordings of electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), intracranial EEG (iEEG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electromyography (EMG) are easy to find and hard to train on. Turning a deposit into model input still means writing download, parsing, repair and windowing code for each dataset, and a dataset that meets a metadata standard can still fail to load. EEGDash is an open-source registry over public Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) datasets from the OpenNeuro and NEMAR archives and from local deposits. Each dataset becomes a Python class; format defects are repaired lazily; signal handling, windowing and format checking are delegated to MNE-Python, Braindecode and the official BIDS validator. Semantic search, a web browser, publication-derived dataset tags and a feature-extraction module share the registry. EEGDash indexes the metadata of 892 public BIDS datasets (43,911 participants and 126,672 hours across the five modalities), loads any of them into a PyTorch dataset without custom data-loading code, and shows on 503 OpenNeuro EEG datasets that passing the BIDS validator does not predict whether a dataset loads (Spearman $ρ= -0.05$), so an archive built for machine learning has to track both.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

Scaling subjects in cross-modal alignment: video decoding with EEG foundation model

Naturalistic visual decoding from EEG has long been constrained by cohort size: existing scaling literature caps out at a few dozen subjects, leading prior work to conclude that scaling subject cohorts yields minimal performance gains. Training a cross-modal EEG--video contrastive encoder on a cohort larger by more than an order of magnitude, we find the axis is productive but has an onset. Below $S\approx50$ --- the entirety of the range prior work occupies --- no model improves meaningfully over an untrained encoder; above it, decoding rises log-linearly in subject count with no saturation at the top of our ladder, on a fitted stimulus-feature probe and on fit-free movie-moment retrieval alike, and the gain transfers to a second, unseen film. How far the axis carries then depends on initialisation more than on capacity: an encoder initialised from an EEG foundation model scales ${\sim}1.6\times$ faster per doubling of the cohort than randomly initialised encoders at two depths, is the only one still converting subjects into retrieval accuracy at the top of the ladder, and converges on a fraction of the alignment compute. Subject scaling on shared naturalistic stimuli is thus an effective and currently unsaturated frontier for scaling EEG foundation models.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

What masking geometry works best for EEG foundation models?

EEG foundation models hold promise for scalable brain-signal decoding across clinical and cognitive neuroscience applications, yet their pre-training pipelines remain poorly understood. Among design choices, the masking strategy is particularly critical: it determines what the network must predict and from which context. Yet it has never been ablated in isolation, as each new model bundles a new masking strategy with a new backbone and objective. In this paper, we formalize the design choices for spatio-temporal masking strategies and train various models with a single pipeline under varying masking configurations across two SSL frameworks (MAE and JEPA). We then systematically evaluate the resulting 58 pre-trained models on the 12 datasets of OpenEEGBench under a linear probe. Both frameworks agree on an optimal masking configuration and on shared failure modes. Outside these, performance is robust: 11 MAE and 9 JEPA configurations are statistically indistinguishable from the best. We further identify a novel JEPA-specific failure mode, tagged bias-inflation collapse, invisible to standard detectors. With a well-chosen mask, our pipeline reaches REVE-level downstream performance at a fraction of REVE's pre-training compute.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

EEG Foundation Challenge: From Cross-Task to Cross-Subject EEG Decoding

Current electroencephalogram (EEG) decoding models are typically trained on small numbers of subjects performing a single task. Here, we introduce a large-scale, code-submission-based competition comprising two challenges. First, the Transfer Challenge asks participants to build and test a model that can zero-shot decode new tasks and new subjects from their EEG data. Second, the Psychopathology factor prediction Challenge asks participants to infer subject measures of mental health from EEG data. For this, we use an unprecedented, multi-terabyte dataset of high-density EEG signals (128 channels) recorded from over 3,000 child to young adult subjects engaged in multiple active and passive tasks. We provide several tunable neural network baselines for each of these two challenges, including a simple network and demographic-based regression models. Developing models that generalise across tasks and individuals will pave the way for ML network architectures capable of adapting to EEG data collected from diverse tasks and individuals. Similarly, predicting mental health-relevant personality trait values from EEG might identify objective biomarkers useful for clinical diagnosis and design of personalised treatment for psychological conditions. Ultimately, the advances spurred by this challenge could contribute to the development of computational psychiatry and useful neurotechnology, and contribute to breakthroughs in both fundamental neuroscience and applied clinical research.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

EEGPrep: a validated Python implementation of the EEGLAB preprocessing pipeline

Objective. Automated EEG preprocessing is common in research and clinical work, but few pipelines have been tested systematically. In a recent benchmark, the default EEGLAB pipeline was the only pipeline that significantly outperformed simple high pass filtering. Its MATLAB implementation, however, complicates deployment in Python and cloud workflows. We developed EEGPrep to reproduce this pipeline in Python while supporting BIDS data. The main technical problem was numerical: small floating point differences can accumulate during recursive filtering and ICA. Approach. EEGPrep covers the default EEGLAB workflow: average rereferencing, artifact removal with the clean rawdata plugin, Picard ICA, ICLabel component classification, channel interpolation, and epoching. We compared each stage with MATLAB reference output on ARM arm64, the primary analysis, and Intel x86 64, the supplementary analysis. The test dataset contained 64 channel P300 auditory oddball recordings from 13 participants. We measured maximum absolute difference, RMS error, AMARI distance for ICA, and agreement between ICLabel decisions. Main Results. On ARM arm64, import and rereferencing matched exactly for all 12 analysed subjects. The clean rawdata and Picard ICA stages remained at numerical zero, with maximum RMS equal to 1.5 x 10^-12 microvolts, AMARI distance less than or equal to 0.000001, and mean correlation equal to 1.000. ICLabel neural network inference introduced the only measurable difference, with maximum RMS equal to 2.0 x 10^-5 microvolts. Rejection decisions nevertheless agreed for every subject, and the difference did not increase through interpolation and epoching, with end to end maximum RMS less than or equal to 2.1 x 10^-5 microvolts. The Intel x86 64 analysis matched to the same precision. Significance. EEGPrep reproduces the validated EEGLAB pipeline and can be installed from PyPI or run in Docker.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

From EEG Cleaning to Decoding: The Role of Artifact Rejection in MI-based BCIs

Motor imagery (MI) BCIs are sensitive to EEG artifacts, yet the practical impact of automated artifact rejection on downstream MI decoding performance remains unclear. While most work focuses on decoder design, the contribution of data curation, particularly automated rejection policies, has received comparatively less attention, despite its importance for robust machine learning pipelines. Here, we propose Fast Automatic Artifact Rejection (FAAR), a lightweight method that computes a compact set of artifact-sensitive features, derives an epoch-level Signal Quality Index, adaptively selects rejection thresholds, and automatically rejects contaminated epochs without requiring prior knowledge of artifact types or manual threshold tuning. We evaluate FAAR on 13 publicly available MI datasets and compare it to a no-rejection baseline, AutoReject, and Isolation Forest. We show rejection effects are strongly subject- and regime-dependent, with the largest gains in low-baseline/low-SNR conditions, so it should be used adaptively. FAAR reduces inter-subject performance variability, an important property for MI-BCI reliability and BCI-illiteracy, without aggressive data removal. Finally, FAAR's lightweight and fully automated thresholding yields consistent rejection behavior across offline curation, training, and online filtering, and supports real-time BCI constraints.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

Channel Adaptation for EEG Foundation Models: A Systematic Benchmark Across Architectures, Tasks, and Training Regimes

Scaling EEG foundation models requires pooling data across heterogeneous electrode montages, a prerequisite both for larger pretraining corpora and for downstream deployment. We present the first systematic comparison of four channel adaptation methods (Conv1d projection, spherical spline interpolation (SSI), source-space decomposition, and Riemannian re-centering) across five pretrained EEG foundation models (5M--157M parameters), five downstream tasks, and two training regimes with 10--15 random seeds each. We find that rigid-montage models (BENDR, Neuro-GPT) require external adaptation, while flexible models (EEGPT, CBraMod) match or exceed it natively when fine-tuned but benefit from external methods under frozen-encoder deployment. A probe-SFT asymmetry exists: external adaptation can cause severe negative transfer during fine-tuning of flexible models. The optimal method is architecture-dependent (Conv1d for BENDR, SSI/Riemannian for Neuro-GPT, source-space decomposition for depression detection), and 5M-parameter CBraMod outperforms models up to 31$\times$ larger on 4/5 datasets, consistent with independent findings that compact EEG-specific architectures can match larger models.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

ENIGMA: EEG-to-Image in 15 Minutes Using Less Than 1% of the Parameters

To be practical for real-life applications, models for brain-computer interfaces must be easily and quickly deployable on new subjects, effective on affordable scanning hardware, and small enough to run locally on accessible computing resources. To directly address these current limitations, we introduce ENIGMA, a multi-subject electroencephalography (EEG)-to-Image decoding model that reconstructs seen images from EEG recordings and achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the research-grade THINGS-EEG2 and consumer-grade AllJoined-1.6M benchmarks, while fine-tuning effectively on new subjects with as little as 15 minutes of data. ENIGMA boasts a simpler architecture and requires less than 1% of the trainable parameters necessary for previous approaches. Our approach integrates a subject-unified spatio-temporal backbone along with a set of multi-subject latent alignment layers and an MLP projector to map raw EEG signals to a rich visual latent space. We evaluate our approach using a broad suite of image reconstruction metrics that have been standardized in the adjacent field of fMRI-to-Image research, and we describe the first EEG-to-Image study to conduct extensive behavioral evaluations of our reconstructions using human raters. Our simple and robust architecture provides a significant performance boost across both research-grade and consumer-grade EEG hardware, and a substantial improvement in fine-tuning efficiency and inference cost. Finally, we provide extensive ablations to determine the architectural choices most responsible for our performance gains in both single and multi-subject cases across multiple benchmark datasets. Collectively, our work provides a substantial step towards the development of practical brain-computer interface applications.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2025

Adaptive Split-MMD Training for Small-Sample Cross-Dataset P300 EEG Classification

Detecting single-trial P300 from EEG is difficult when only a few labeled trials are available. When attempting to boost a small target set with a large source dataset through transfer learning, cross-dataset shift arises. To address this challenge, we study transfer between two public visual-oddball ERP datasets using five shared electrodes (Fz, Pz, P3, P4, Oz) under a strict small-sample regime (target: 10 trials/subject; source: 80 trials/subject). We introduce Adaptive Split Maximum Mean Discrepancy Training (AS-MMD), which combines (i) a target-weighted loss with warm-up tied to the square root of the source/target size ratio, (ii) Split Batch Normalization (Split-BN) with shared affine parameters and per-domain running statistics, and (iii) a parameter-free logit-level Radial Basis Function kernel Maximum Mean Discrepancy (RBF-MMD) term using the median-bandwidth heuristic. Implemented on an EEG Conformer, AS-MMD is backbone-agnostic and leaves the inference-time model unchanged. Across both transfer directions, it outperforms target-only and pooled training (Active Visual Oddball: accuracy/AUC 0.66/0.74; ERP CORE P3: 0.61/0.65), with gains over pooling significant under corrected paired t-tests. Ablations attribute improvements to all three components.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2025

Alljoined-1.6M: A Million-Trial EEG-Image Dataset for Evaluating Affordable Brain-Computer Interfaces

We present a new large-scale electroencephalography (EEG) dataset as part of the THINGS initiative, comprising over 1.6 million visual stimulus trials collected from 20 participants, and totaling more than twice the size of the most popular current benchmark dataset, THINGS-EEG2. Crucially, our data was recorded using a 32-channel consumer-grade wet electrode system costing ~$2.2k, around 27x cheaper than research-grade EEG systems typically used in cognitive neuroscience labs. Our work is one of the first open-source, large-scale EEG resource designed to closely reflect the quality of hardware that is practical to deploy in real-world, downstream applications of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). We aim to explore the specific question of whether deep neural network-based BCI research and semantic decoding methods can be effectively conducted with such affordable systems, filling an important gap in current literature that is extremely relevant for future research. In our analysis, we not only demonstrate that decoding of high-level semantic information from EEG of visualized images is possible at consumer-grade hardware, but also that our data can facilitate effective EEG-to-Image reconstruction even despite significantly lower signal-to-noise ratios. In addition to traditional benchmarks, we also conduct analyses of EEG-to-Image models that demonstrate log-linear decoding performance with increasing data volume on our data, and discuss the trade-offs between hardware cost, signal fidelity, and the scale of data collection efforts in increasing the size and utility of currently available datasets. Our contributions aim to pave the way for large-scale, cost-effective EEG research with widely accessible equipment, and position our dataset as a unique resource for the democratization and development of effective deep neural models of visual cognition.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2025

Data Normalization Strategies for EEG Deep Learning

Normalization is a critical yet often overlooked component in the preprocessing pipeline for EEG deep learning applications. The rise of large-scale pretraining paradigms such as self-supervised learning (SSL) introduces a new set of tasks whose nature is substantially different from supervised training common in EEG deep learning applications. This raises new questions about optimal normalization strategies for the applicable task. In this study, we systematically evaluate the impact of normalization granularity (recording vs. window level) and scope (cross-channel vs. within-channel) on both supervised (age and gender prediction) and self-supervised (Contrastive Predictive Coding) tasks. Using high-density resting-state EEG from 2,836 subjects in the Healthy Brain Network dataset, we show that optimal normalization strategies differ significantly between training paradigms. Window-level within-channel normalization yields the best performance in supervised tasks, while minimal or cross-channel normalization at the window level is more effective for SSL. These results underscore the necessity of task-specific normalization choices and challenge the assumption that a universal normalization strategy can generalize across learning settings. Our findings provide practical insights for developing robust EEG deep learning pipelines as the field shifts toward large-scale, foundation model training.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2025

Quantifying Data Requirements for EEG Independent Component Analysis Using AMICA

Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is an important step in EEG processing for a wide-ranging set of applications. However, ICA requires well-designed studies and data collection practices to yield optimal results. Past studies have focused on quantitative evaluation of the differences in quality produced by different ICA algorithms as well as different configurations of parameters for AMICA, a multimodal ICA algorithm that is considered the benchmark against which other algorithms are measured. Here, the effect of the data quantity versus the number of channels on decomposition quality is explored. AMICA decompositions were run on a 71 channel dataset with 13 subjects while randomly subsampling data to correspond to specific ratios of the number of frames in a dataset to the channel count. Decomposition quality was evaluated for the varying quantities of data using measures of mutual information reduction (MIR) and the near dipolarity of components. We also note that an asymptotic trend can be seen in the increase of MIR and a general increasing trend in near dipolarity with increasing data, but no definitive plateau in these metrics was observed, suggesting that the benefits of collecting additional EEG data may extend beyond common heuristic thresholds and continue to enhance decomposition quality.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2024

Automatic EEG Independent Component Classification Using ICLabel in Python

ICLabel is an important plug-in function in EEGLAB, the most widely used software for EEG data processing. A powerful approach to automated processing of EEG data involves decomposing the data by Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and then classifying the resulting independent components (ICs) using ICLabel. While EEGLAB pipelines support high-performance computing (HPC) platforms running the open-source Octave interpreter, the ICLabel plug-in is incompatible with Octave because of its specialized neural network architecture. To enhance cross-platform compatibility, we developed a Python version of ICLabel that uses standard EEGLAB data structures. We compared ICLabel MATLAB and Python implementations to data from 14 subjects. ICLabel returns the likelihood of classification in 7 classes of components for each ICA component. The returned IC classifications were virtually identical between Python and MATLAB, with differences in classification percentage below 0.001%.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2024

Hierarchical Event Descriptor library schema for EEG data annotation

Standardizing terminology to annotate electrophysiological events can improve both computational research and clinical care. Sharing data enriched with standard terms can facilitate data exploration, from case studies to mega-analyses. The machine readability of such electrophysiological event annotations is essential for performing analyses efficiently across software tools and packages. Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED) provide a framework for describing events in neuroscience experiments. HED library schemas extend the standard HED schema vocabulary to include specialized vocabularies, such as standardized clinical terms for electrophysiological events. The Standardized Computer-based Organized Reporting of EEG (SCORE) defines terms for annotating EEG events, including artifacts. This study developed a HED library schema for SCORE, making the terms machine-readable. We demonstrate that the HED-SCORE library schema can be used to annotate events in EEG data stored in the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS). Clinicians and researchers worldwide can now use the HED-SCORE library schema to annotate and compute on electrophysiological data obtained from the human brain.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2024

The Past, Present, and Future of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS)

The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves. We also discuss the lessons learned through the project, with the aim of enabling researchers in other domains to learn from the success of BIDS.

q-bio.OT↗

arXiv2023

An Exploration of Optimal Parameters for Efficient Blind Source Separation of EEG Recordings Using AMICA

EEG continues to find a multitude of uses in both neuroscience research and medical practice, and independent component analysis (ICA) continues to be an important tool for analyzing EEG. A multitude of ICA algorithms for EEG decomposition exist, and in the past, their relative effectiveness has been studied. AMICA is considered the benchmark against which to compare the performance of other ICA algorithms for EEG decomposition. AMICA exposes many parameters to the user to allow for precise control of the decomposition. However, several of the parameters currently tend to be set according to "rules of thumb" shared in the EEG community. Here, AMICA decompositions are run on data from a collection of subjects while varying certain key parameters. The running time and quality of decompositions are analyzed based on two metrics: Pairwise Mutual Information (PMI) and Mutual Information Reduction (MIR). Recommendations for selecting starting values for parameters are presented.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2023

Deep learning applied to EEG data with different montages using spatial attention

The ability of Deep Learning to process and extract relevant information in complex brain dynamics from raw EEG data has been demonstrated in various recent works. Deep learning models, however, have also been shown to perform best on large corpora of data. When processing EEG, a natural approach is to combine EEG datasets from different experiments to train large deep-learning models. However, most EEG experiments use custom channel montages, requiring the data to be transformed into a common space. Previous methods have used the raw EEG signal to extract features of interest and focused on using a common feature space across EEG datasets. While this is a sensible approach, it underexploits the potential richness of EEG raw data. Here, we explore using spatial attention applied to EEG electrode coordinates to perform channel harmonization of raw EEG data, allowing us to train deep learning on EEG data using different montages. We test this model on a gender classification task. We first show that spatial attention increases model performance. Then, we show that a deep learning model trained on data using different channel montages performs significantly better than deep learning models trained on fixed 23- and 128-channel data montages.

cs.LG↗