arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.03045

PEEK: Heterogeneous Parallelism for Privileged Error Detection in Safety-Critical Processors

Tinglue Wang·Zhenghui Guo·Bing Guo·Jiapeng Guan·Renshuang Jiang·Jie Zhang·Jing Li·Xin Si·Sam Ainsworth·Zhe Jiang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Heterogeneous parallel error detection architecture has been widely studied for safeguarding OoO superscalar processors in safetycritical systems, as it achieves significantly lower hardware overhead compared to traditional LockStep, by exploiting the parallelism that exists in a secondary execution. However, previous works do not cover the protection of privileged-mode execution, impeding their effectiveness in real-world deployment. Moreover, naive extension to privileged-mode can cause a litany of issues, from abysmal performance due to high synchronization costs, to full deadlocks. Here, we present PEEK, the first privileged parallel error detection architecture. Based on a deep analysis of privileged execution, we redesign the verification pipeline, addressing all the bottlenecks and bugs identified in privileged-mode protection. Evaluated using various metrics on an RTL-level full system running Linux, PEEK achieves full-privilege protection on Linux with negligible performance slowdown and affordable hardware overhead. PEEK has been taped out using a 28nm process, and its source is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PEEK-3000.

Explore related subjects

cs.AR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tinglue Wang, Zhenghui Guo, Bing Guo, Jiapeng Guan, Renshuang Jiang, Jie Zhang, Jing Li, Xin Si, Sam Ainsworth, Zhe Jiang. 2026-10-02. PEEK: Heterogeneous Parallelism for Privileged Error Detection in Safety-Critical Processors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03045

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Provisioning to Runtime Optimization of a 100 MW-Scale AI Cluster

The electric power supply for AI data centers is now the most significant bottleneck in the race toward Artificial General Intelligence, surpassing even the constraint of AI accelerator availability. To our knowledge, this paper is the first to describe the end-to-end power management process for a hyper-scale AI datacenter; from early power planning to accommodate next-generation accelerators 6--12 months before their general availability, to tuning power settings after large scale deployment, and finally to dynamic, runtime power management for evolving workloads. We present detailed power measurements for a 150 MW datacenter hosting a cluster of 83K GB200 GPUs. We share insights from building this state-of-the-art AI cluster. We hope this work encourages practitioners across the industry to share their own experiences as well.

cs.AR↗
arXiv2026

Divide and conquer: Scalable performance and energy in MCM GPUs

Multi-chip-module (MCM) GPUs offer a promising path to scale compute capability beyond monolithic designs by integrating multiple chiplets on a common package. However, the impact of disaggregation on performance scalability and energy consumption remains underexplored. The design space grows rapidly across dimensions such as SMs per chiplet, chiplet count, and interconnection network. The inter-chiplet network is particularly critical, as it determines whether additional compute resources translate into performance gains. This limited understanding leaves industry and research without clear guidance on the performance and energy trade-offs of MCM GPU scaling. In this work, we investigate whether distributing compute and memory capability across multiple chiplets offers a more scalable alternative to concentrating resources. We quantify their effects on performance, energy, and efficiency and examine how inter-chiplet topology influences scalability at different system sizes. Our results demonstrate that a 16 chiplet Torus configuration with 256 SMs delivers a remarkable $2.40\times$ performance improvement over a state-of-the-art MCM architecture with the same compute capability, while simultaneously reducing energy consumption by $4.45\times$. These substantial gains provide evidence that disaggregation is a first-order architectural factor and will be critical to unlocking the performance and energy-efficiency potential of next-generation GPUs.

cs.AR↗
arXiv2026

Evidence-Guided Repository-Level RTL Repair

Repository-level RTL repair must localize a failure that spans files, modules, and clock cycles, then propagate the fix consistently. Existing methods reason over source code, which reveals possible behaviors but not the failed execution, and cannot tell whether a local fix was propagated consistently. We therefore present an evidence-guided framework with three modules. Failure grounding converts a problem statement into a reproduced failing run and a failure anchor. Waveform-guided localization uses a localization toolbox to narrow the observed violation into a candidate mechanism and an evidence trail. Consistency-aware repair and validation then expand that seed into a coordinated patch and replay the same scenario to check that the violation disappears. We conducted experiments on HWE-Bench and achieved better performance than the baseline.

cs.AR↗