SEARCH · arXiv Science

Results for “cs.AR”

Search indexed arXiv papers on artificial intelligence, large language models, computer vision and robotics. Read source abstracts and follow links to arXiv.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5,200 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Are Widely Known Findings Easier to Retract?

Failures of retraction are common in science. Why do they occur? And what determines whether a retraction is successful? We use data from citation records and Altmetrics to test proposed answers to these questions. LaCroix et al. employ network models to argue the social spread of information helps explain failures of retraction. One prediction is that widely known results, surprisingly, should be easier to retract, since their retraction is more relevant. Our results support this conclusion. We find highly cited papers show more significant reductions in citation after retraction and garner more attention to their retractions as they occur.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2026

Are We There Yet? Assessing Computer-Use Agents for Blind Users' Accessible Interaction with Desktop Applications

Computer-use agents are emerging as a paradigm for agentic human-AI interaction, combining language reasoning with multi-modal interface grounding to operate GUIs. Yet their effectiveness for blind screen-reader users in real-world desktop workflows remains unclear. We present a three-week diary study with 8 blind users using OLLA, a screen-reader-accessible CUA prototype, collecting 1,258 commands across 12 applications with screenshots, UI trees, model responses, and action traces. We evaluate GPT-5 during deployment and re-execute the same commands with four additional models. GPT-5 achieved the highest success rate at 52.5%. Trace analysis reveals grounding, planning, constraint-tracking, and termination failures, while interviews reveal beyond-automation needs.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Self-Reports Are Not Verification: Environment-Grounded Auditing of LLM Operators in Evolutionary Search

Language model agents increasingly propose actions, observe external feedback, and explain their own behavior. Their confidence and rationales are convenient monitoring signals, but convenience is not verification. We introduce an environment-grounded audit in which every intermediate proposal receives an exact outcome. A language model operates an evolutionary Contexto search whose feedback function assigns every valid guess an exact rank without human annotation. Across 200 runs spanning five configurations and three model families, four reporting configurations produce 12,249 self-reports. We test three assumptions: stated confidence is calibrated, inherited rationales affect later proposals, and fitness-based selection improves report quality. All three fail. Operators overstate top-100 success by factors of 4.8 to 9.3, while calibration and discrimination dissociate across model families. Controlled interventions on 754 inherited rationales bound any measured benefit of the genuine rationale to roughly 250 ranks. Neither fitness-based nor random selection produces a detectable selection differential or parent-to-offspring transmission in report accuracy, despite sharply different search behavior. Agent self-reports should therefore be treated as claims to verify against the environment, not as evidence of their own reliability.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Context-Grounding Gains Are Mediated by Pre-existing Machinery: Auditing GRPO, SFT, and DPO

Language models can ignore prompt evidence when it conflicts with memorized knowledge. Post-training can make models follow such evidence more reliably, but it is unclear whether these gains require new machinery or strengthen machinery already present. We compare nine post-training arms spanning GRPO, SFT, and DPO from one starting checkpoint, with key comparisons extended across scales and families. We estimate a grounding direction from that checkpoint before training. Across five tested GRPO variants, grounding gains are small. For the two variants replicated across seeds, equivalence tests bound their effects below the conflict-SFT gain even as the rewarded metric improves. Conflict-SFT improves grounding moderately, while DPO drives grounding near ceiling on its matched distribution. Conflict-SFT and DPO largely use the same causal attention-head set as the starting model. Subtracting the starting-model direction suppresses both gains, while adding it to the starting model recovers 35% of DPO's gain at a dose passing all stated side-effect checks. After a supervised warm start makes the context answer appear in more rollouts, the same GRPO recipe adds essentially no further grounding gain. In our setting, grounding gains largely depend on machinery already present in the starting model.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Are You Thinking What I am Thinking? : Examining Conceptual Separation in Neural Architectures

Neural networks are increasingly employed to identify both well-defined and ambiguous concepts, yet output-level metrics reveal little about how those concepts are represented internally. Our study asks if these networks exhibit \textit{conceptual separation}: if examples of the same concept form coherent representations, and whether related concepts lie closer together in the representation space. We examine this conceptual organisation in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) through geometric and distributional analysis of their internal activations. In CNNs, familiar ImageNet concepts form coherent and semantically ordered representations, while this coherence weakens for unseen concepts and suffers within-class domain shift. In LLMs, clearly distinct domains remain well separated, related subdomains move closer together, and the distinction between ambiguous topics collapses at both the mean and covariance level. These results suggest that conceptual separation can reveal structure that output accuracy alone cannot, and may serve as a useful diagnostic of how robustly a model represents the concepts it is asked to identify. Code and data available on \href{https://github.com/JaeeRoshniCapstoneProject/Are-You-Thinking-What-I-m-Thinking-Examining-Conceptual-Separation-in-Neural-Architectures}{GitHub}.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

The Calls are Coming from Inside the Model: Investigating Probe-based Detection of Tool-Calling Errors in LLMs

The hidden states of large language models (LLMs) are known to capture rich information relating to model knowledge and behavior that can be hard to extract from examination of input and output alone. As LLM-based systems increasingly interface with the external world, one area of concern is detecting incorrect or improper use of tools. Motivated by this, we study the effectiveness of using linear probes to detect incorrect tool-calls, measuring probe efficacy across 18 tool-calling LLMs evaluated on the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard. Overall, we find that probing is an effective means to catch a range of different tool-calling errors, including errors arising from using an argument that has the wrong value but the correct type, which might not be recorded by standard logging frameworks. Important factors in success include model size, probing layer, and model post-training type. We also show that probes are capable of generalizing to novel types of errors, which is critical in real world deployments.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Why are all LLMs Obsessed with Japanese Culture? On the Hidden Cultural and Regional Biases of LLMs

LLMs have limitations when it comes to cultural coverage and competence, and in some cases, show specific cultural biases. Although prior studies have examined the cultural capabilities of LLMs, none have specifically investigated their regional preferences in generic culture-related questions. In this work, we propose a new dataset based on a comprehensive taxonomy of Culture-Related Open Questions (CROQ), with questions available in 24 languages. We evaluate LLMs by prompting them to answer questions from CROQ and provide a sample location. The results show that, contrary to previous cultural bias work, LLMs show a clear tendency towards countries such as Japan in their answers. Moreover, our results show that when prompting in languages such as English or other high-resource ones, LLMs tend to provide more diverse outputs. Low-resource languages, on the other hand, show more inclinations towards answering questions highlighting countries for which the input language is an official language. Finally, we also investigate at which point of LLM training this cultural bias emerges, with our results suggesting that the first clear signs appear after supervised fine-tuning, and not during pre-training. Dataset available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/HiTZ/CROQ

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

What Are You Listening to? Temporal Music Grounding for Audio-to-Text Large Language Models

Large audio-language models can produce fluent and musically plausible responses, yet it often remains unclear whether those responses are grounded in the audio input. We introduce temporal music grounding, a task in which a model returns one or more time spans corresponding to a queried musical note, event, or pattern. To evaluate this capability, we present MusicGroundingBench, a controlled benchmark suite built by rendering algorithmically generated piano MIDI to audio, yielding exact symbolic-to-audio alignment. The suite comprises two subsets: MGBench-3N, which evaluates note-level grounding in clips containing up to three notes, and MGBench-2B, which evaluates structured grounding and short-form music understanding in two-bar excerpts. Experiments show that temporal music grounding remains challenging for current audio-language models, whereas task-specific training yields substantial gains. We further report exploratory evidence on the relationship between grounding supervision and music understanding. These results establish MusicGroundingBench as a controlled testbed for assessing whether audio-language models ground their responses in temporally localized musical evidence.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Hidden Thoughts Are Not Secret: Reasoning Trace Exposure in LLMs

Reasoning traces have become a valuable form of learning signals for improving and transferring the capabilities of large language models. In particular, detailed traces can help distill reasoning behavior from stronger teacher models into weaker student models. The value of capability transfer has motivated many deployed systems with reasoning models to hide raw internal traces and expose at most summaries and answers to users. As a result, we ask whether such interface-level trace hiding prevents users from obtaining useful reasoning supervision through prompting. We study this question with Reasoning Exposure Prompting (REP), a lightweight in-context elicitation method that uses shadow-model-generated demonstrations wrapped in auxiliary code-like formats to raise user-visible reasoning traces from a victim model. Across the common reasoning dataset, different victim models, and different student model distillation, REP substantially increases similarity between exposed and REP-conditioned internal traces while preserving useful reasoning signals.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Are Single-Token Sparse Autoencoder Features Causally Necessary? Layer-Depth and SAE-Family Effects

Sparse autoencoder (SAE) features are used to interpret and steer large language models, yet nobody has tested whether a feature's causal role is stable across SAE families. Single-token features fire on one vocabulary item, so ground truth permits direct comparison. We analyze 3.9M features across six models and three SAE families and zero-ablate at full layer depth: they sit 4.7x tighter in decoder space and concentrate in early layers. Deleting one lowers the model's logit for that token in 178 of 208 layer conditions, significant after multiple-comparison correction. And depth decides how the damage lands: early-layer deletions disrupt the layers that follow, late-layer deletions change the output directly. Cross-family causal differences exceed within-family scale effects: on the same base model, GemmaScope and BatchTopK features are causally anchored, LlamaScope features locally redundant. Under LlamaScope the token returns to within 2x its pre-ablation rank 96-98% of the time. Changing only the activation function reverses the sign of that difference, so the training recipe is the remaining candidate: cross-family claims are sensitive to training methodology, not just activation function or scale.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Final Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Analyzing Latent Reasoning Faithfulness Along Training Trajectories

Latent reasoning performs multi-step inference in continuous hidden states, promising more compact and efficient reasoning. However, these opaque states raise a question of faithfulness: whether the latent reasoning steps drive the final answer. Prior work studies this question at selected checkpoints and reports several unfaithful behaviors. This endpoint view leaves how evidence of faithfulness evolves during training unexamined. We track behavioral and activation-based evidence across training using verified counterfactual edits and interventions on the latent reasoning states. We find that high task accuracy can coexist with low counterfactual responsiveness: as accuracy improves, responsiveness can decline, and different latent reasoning approaches follow distinct trajectories. On ProsQA, output sensitivity to norm-noise replacement declines alongside counterfactual responsiveness, although the result depends on the replacement. Across separately trained binary-choice and open-ended GSM settings, intervention sensitivity follows opposite trajectories. These results show that evaluating only a final checkpoint can obscure both when counterfactual responsiveness changes and what the latent states contribute.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Language Diffusion Models are Associative Memories Capable of Retrieving Unseen Data

When do language diffusion models memorize their training data, and how to quantitatively assess their true generative regime? We address these questions by showing that Uniform-based Discrete Diffusion Models (UDDMs) fundamentally behave as Associative Memories (AMs) $\textit{with emergent creative capabilities}$. The core idea of an AM is to reliably recover stored data points as $\textit{memories}$ by establishing distinct basins of attraction around them. Historically, models like Hopfield networks use an explicit energy function to guarantee these stable attractors. We broaden this perspective by leveraging the observation that energy is not strictly necessary, as basins of attraction can also be formed via conditional likelihood maximization. By evaluating token recovery of $\textit{training}$ and $\textit{test}$ examples, we identify in UDDMs a sharp memorization-to-generalization transition governed by the size of the training dataset: as it increases, basins around training examples shrink and basins around unseen test examples expand, until both later converge to the same level. Crucially, we can detect this transition using only the conditional entropy of predicted token sequences: memorization is characterized by vanishing conditional entropy, while in the generalization regime the conditional entropy of most tokens remains finite. Thus, conditional entropy offers a practical probe for the memorization-to-generalization transition in deployed models.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Nested Byte-Level Vocabularies Are Cheap to Deploy and Expensive to Share: A Pre-Registered Negative Result

A byte-level BPE tokenizer is an ordered list of merge rules, so applying only a prefix yields a vocabulary whose token identifiers are the first rows of the full vocabulary. This prefix nesting allows one language model to operate at several vocabulary sizes, use a control token to indicate the active size, and be deployed at any trained size by slicing its embedding and output head. We pre-registered five claims, including margins, seeds, contrasts, and a stop rule, and trained 30 models with 3.1M- and 10.6M-parameter bodies on 200M tokens each. Slicing is numerically exact: across 76 checks, a sliced model reproduces the restricted full model's logits bit for bit and removes 66% of deployed weights without changing latency. However, the shared model trails a fixed-cap specialist by 3.64% bits per byte at 32k against a 1% margin, and by 2.96% at 8k against a 2% margin. A 2x2 ablation separating the control token from output restriction finds that the token changes performance by +0.07% to +0.13%, with all intervals crossing zero, while output restriction costs +0.47% to +1.19%; the factors are substitutes rather than complements. Multi-cap training nevertheless improves robustness: under typographical noise, the same checkpoint degrades 12.5--15.4 points less in its fine mode and outperforms each fixed-cap specialist at that specialist's vocabulary size. A control with neither cap token nor output restriction is equally robust, attributing this benefit to multi-granularity training rather than conditioning. The per-cap penalty tracks each cap's share of training rows, yielding a falsifiable prediction for future work.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Solaris: Towards Interfaces That Are Generated, Not Coded

Digital interfaces are traditionally implemented through intermediate representations such as code, requiring their appearance and behavior to be specified in advance. We introduce Solaris, an interface world model that instead generates an interactive UI directly, frame by frame, in response to user actions. Solaris treats mouse interactions as conditioning signals and autoregressively synthesizes the resulting visual state at interactive speeds. To enable real-time generation while maintaining visual coherence over extended interactions, we combine autoregressive frame generation with few-step distillation and training on the model's own outputs. A language model complements the visual world model by interpreting user intent and specifying how interactions should affect the generated environment, separating high-level reasoning from visual rendering. By generating both the appearance and behavior of an interface dynamically, Solaris enables open-ended interactions that need not be explicitly programmed in advance. We view interface world models as a step toward a new paradigm for software, where interfaces are generated and adapted continuously around user intent rather than implemented as fixed collections of predefined states and

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Are LLMs Ready to Assist Physicians? PhysAssistBench for Interactive Doctor-Patient-EHR Assistance

The most plausible near-term role of medical LLMs is to assist rather than replace physicians, yet current evaluations often test isolated capabilities: clinical knowledge, EHR system interaction, or patient communication. Physician assistance instead requires coordinating these capabilities within the same interaction, where physicians issue underspecified requests, patients describe symptoms ambiguously, and EHR systems demand precise tool use. We introduce PhysAssistBench, a benchmark for interactive doctor-patient-EHR assistance. Built from real MIMIC-IV cases, PhysAssistBench uses a scalable pipeline to construct agentic patients: interactive, record-grounded agents that turn static EHR records into multi-turn clinical scenarios while preserving clinical factuality. PhysAssistBench provides a curated bilingual evaluation set of 1,296 manually reviewed and physician-validated turns. Experiments with leading LLMs show that current models remain unreliable in this setting, which exposes a key bottleneck for clinical LLMs: reliable assistance requires coordination across knowledge, communication, and systems, not isolated gains in any of them.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Are Near-Tied LLM Rankings Robust to Family-DIF-Guided Benchmark Recomposition?

Small leaderboard gaps are often interpreted as evidence that one language model is better than another, but their sign may depend on which benchmark items are included. We test this using item-level responses from five benchmarks and a family-label-free spectral approximation to multidimensional item-response theory (MIRT). In owner-disjoint folds, one owner half identifies items with low residual differential item functioning across model families (low-DIF); the resulting frozen, source- and easiness-balanced weights score models in the other half, while equally short matched-random subtests control for generic subtest variation. Full-benchmark and low-DIF rankings remain strongly correlated ($τ_b=.900$--$.948$). Yet in four of five benchmarks, 30.9--47.1\% of cross-family pairs initially within one percentage point reverse order, exceeding their matched-random medians by 16.9--28.6 percentage points (all $p=.001$). The fifth benchmark shows no reliable excess ($-0.9$ points, $p=.689$). The pattern survives all pre-specified population perturbations, and residual item--family signatures replicate across owner halves; however, no family shows a consistent advantage across benchmarks. Thus, globally stable rankings can still leave individual near-tie orderings sensitive to benchmark composition, and sub-one-point leaderboard gaps should be accompanied by evidence that the implied ordering is composition-robust.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Not All Explanations Are Sought: Information-Seeking Psychology for Human-Centered XAI

This position paper argues that human-centered explainable AI (HCXAI) should incorporate insights from the psychology of information seeking. Drawing on Sharot and Sunstein's framework of information-seeking motives, we propose that people evaluate whether to engage with explanations based on three types of expected utility: instrumental (will it help me act better?), hedonic (will it make me feel better?), and cognitive (will it improve my understanding?). Each utility is estimated through a lens shaped by well-documented cognitive biases, including illusion of control, automation bias, unrealistic optimism, impact bias, overconfidence, and confirmation bias. These biases can lead to two failure modes: excessive information-seeking that fragments attention without improving decisions, and insufficient information-seeking that leaves critical risks and misunderstandings unexamined. This challenge is particularly acute for agentic AI systems, where explanations must support not just understanding a single output but anticipating cascading actions, assessing risks, and deciding when to intervene. By integrating information-seeking psychology into HCXAI, we advocate for a shift from making explanations available to making them sought: designing systems that account for when and why users actually want to know.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CHASE: How Content Ecosystems Are Reshaped When Ranking Is the Only Target

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is increasingly used to improve content visibility in LLM-based retrieval systems, yet its population-level effects under repeated optimization remain poorly understood. We introduce Content Homogenization under rAnking Signal Exploitation (CHASE), a controlled simulation framework for studying how content ecosystems are reshaped when creators repeatedly adapt documents to an LLM ranking signal. We use ranking as a proxy for source visibility and validate this abstraction against citations in grounded generated responses, obtaining a rank-citation AUC of 0.853 $\pm$ 0.093 across six domains. CHASE then iterates ranking, feature discrimination, rewriting, and evaluation over 20 rounds across different domains. Quality-ranking alignment decreases in all six domains: from R0 to R20, the change in Spearman's rho ranges from -0.107 to -0.018, with a mean change of -0.068, which means documents closer to the ranking feature profile become less aligned with independently judged document quality over the simulation horizon. A random-target control has shown that it is associated with adaptation toward ranking-derived incentives rather than iterative rewriting alone. The resulting ecosystem dynamics are strongly domain-dependent. Together, these findings show how repeated optimization against a fixed LLM ranking signal can reshape both content populations and the incentives faced by content creators.

cs.AI↗