arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.13215

Performance of an Optical TPC Geant4 Simulation with Opticks GPU-Accelerated Photon Propagation

NEXT Collaboration·I. Parmaksiz·K. Mistry·E. Church·C. Adams·J. Asaadi·J. Baeza-Rubio·K. Bailey·N. Byrnes·B. J. P. Jones·I. A. Moya·K. E. Navarro·D. R. Nygren·P. Oyedele·L. Rogers·F. Samaniego·K. Stogsdill·H. Almazán·V. Álvarez·B. Aparicio·A. I. Aranburu·L. Arazi·I. J. Arnquist·F. Auria-Luna·S. Ayet·C. D. R. Azevedo·F. Ballester·M. del Barrio-Torregrosa·A. Bayo·J. M. Benlloch-Rodríguez·F. I. G. M. Borges·A. Brodolin·S. Cárcel·A. Castillo·L. Cid·C. A. N. Conde·T. Contreras·F. P. Cossío·R. Coupe·E. Dey·G. Díaz·C. Echevarria·M. Elorza·J. Escada·R. Esteve·R. Felkai·L. M. P. Fernandes·P. Ferrario·A. L. Ferreira·F. W. Foss·Z. Freixa·J. García-Barrena·J. J. Gómez-Cadenas·J. W. R. Grocott·R. Guenette·J. Hauptman·C. A. O. Henriques·J. A. Hernando Morata·P. Herrero-Gómez·V. Herrero·C. Hervés Carrete·Y. Ifergan·F. Kellerer·L. Larizgoitia·A. Larumbe·P. Lebrun·F. Lopez·N. López-March·R. Madigan·R. D. P. Mano·A. P. Marques·J. Martín-Albo·G. Martínez-Lema·M. Martínez-Vara·R. L. Miller·J. Molina-Canteras·F. Monrabal·C. M. B. Monteiro·F. J. Mora·P. Novella·A. Nuñez·E. Oblak·J. Palacio·B. Palmeiro·A. Para·A. Pazos·J. Pelegrin·M. Pérez Maneiro·M. Querol·J. Renner·I. Rivilla·C. Rogero·B. Romeo·C. Romo-Luque·V. San Nacienciano·F. P. Santos·J. M. F. dos Santos·M. Seemann·I. Shomroni·P. A. O. C. Silva
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We investigate the performance of Opticks, a NVIDIA OptiX API 7.5 GPU-accelerated photon propagation tool compared with a single-threaded Geant4 simulation. We compare the simulations using an improved model of the NEXT-CRAB-0 gaseous time projection chamber. Performance results suggest that Opticks improves simulation speeds by between 58.47+/-0.02 and 181.39+/-0.28 times relative to a CPU-only Geant4 simulation and these results vary between different types of GPU and CPU. A detailed comparison shows that the number of detected photons, along with their times and wavelengths, are in good agreement between Opticks and Geant4.

Explore related subjects

physics.ins-dethep-ex

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

NEXT Collaboration, I. Parmaksiz, K. Mistry, E. Church, C. Adams, J. Asaadi, J. Baeza-Rubio, K. Bailey, N. Byrnes, B. J. P. Jones, I. A. Moya, K. E. Navarro, D. R. Nygren, P. Oyedele, L. Rogers, F. Samaniego, K. Stogsdill, H. Almazán, V. Álvarez, B. Aparicio, A. I. Aranburu, L. Arazi, I. J. Arnquist, F. Auria-Luna, S. Ayet, C. D. R. Azevedo, F. Ballester, M. del Barrio-Torregrosa, A. Bayo, J. M. Benlloch-Rodríguez, F. I. G. M. Borges, A. Brodolin, S. Cárcel, A. Castillo, L. Cid, C. A. N. Conde, T. Contreras, F. P. Cossío, R. Coupe, E. Dey, G. Díaz, C. Echevarria, M. Elorza, J. Escada, R. Esteve, R. Felkai, L. M. P. Fernandes, P. Ferrario, A. L. Ferreira, F. W. Foss, Z. Freixa, J. García-Barrena, J. J. Gómez-Cadenas, J. W. R. Grocott, R. Guenette, J. Hauptman, C. A. O. Henriques, J. A. Hernando Morata, P. Herrero-Gómez, V. Herrero, C. Hervés Carrete, Y. Ifergan, F. Kellerer, L. Larizgoitia, A. Larumbe, P. Lebrun, F. Lopez, N. López-March, R. Madigan, R. D. P. Mano, A. P. Marques, J. Martín-Albo, G. Martínez-Lema, M. Martínez-Vara, R. L. Miller, J. Molina-Canteras, F. Monrabal, C. M. B. Monteiro, F. J. Mora, P. Novella, A. Nuñez, E. Oblak, J. Palacio, B. Palmeiro, A. Para, A. Pazos, J. Pelegrin, M. Pérez Maneiro, M. Querol, J. Renner, I. Rivilla, C. Rogero, B. Romeo, C. Romo-Luque, V. San Nacienciano, F. P. Santos, J. M. F. dos Santos, M. Seemann, I. Shomroni, P. A. O. C. Silva. 2025-07-09. Performance of an Optical TPC Geant4 Simulation with Opticks GPU-Accelerated Photon Propagation. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc%2Fs10052-025-14612-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Development of an Extensible Unified Control System Using the STARS Framework and Common Commands for Detector Control

A zooming optical system comprising two Fresnel zone plates (FZPs) was developed and installed at the AR-NE1A beamline of the Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Japan. To ensure reliable and versatile operation, we implemented a dedicated control architecture based on the Simple Transmission and Retrieval System (STARS) framework and the newly proposed STARS Common Commands for Detector Control (CCDC)---a data-acquisition (DAQ) state model and command set designed specifically for detector control. The system serves both as a practical control system for the zooming optics and as a demonstration of modular extensibility using STARS and detector interoperability through CCDC. The system has been commissioned, and its performance has been verified at the AR-NE1A beamline. The architecture enables flexible configuration of optical components and provides a unified interface for both routine operation and advanced experimental protocols.

physics.ins-det↗
arXiv2026

Agentic TCAD Calibration Workflow for Oxide Semiconductor Transistors

Experimental TCAD calibration is essential for predictive technology modeling of emerging oxide semiconductor transistors. However, it remains time-consuming and expert dependent because of model ambiguity. Multiple physical models and parameter sets can reproduce the same measured transfer characteristics, while local fitting alone cannot uniquely identify the underlying device physics. We present the first demonstration of an agentic TCAD calibration workflow for a fabricated bottom-gate In--W--O (BG-IWO) transistor. Starting from the measured transfer curve and device information, the workflow uses measurement--TCAD residuals and local sensitivity tests to select bounded parameter corrections or evaluate additional physical models, and accept only updates that improve device metrics. The LLM agent orchestrates the workflow, while Sentaurus governs the device physics. For the 2\%-W reference device, five agent-suggested updates yield a fixed calibrated model, reducing the multi-metric device objective $J$ by 14.3$\times$. Maximum $V_{\mathrm{th}}$/$I_{\mathrm{on}}$ errors are 36.1~mV/0.022 decade for varying-drain-bias tests and 46.2~mV/0.062 decade for varying-channel-length tests, demonstrating model transferability across bias and geometry rather than a local parameter fit. W-composition tests provide process-sensitive insight. This agentic workflow provides a faster route to model development for emerging device technologies.

physics.ins-det↗
arXiv2026

Birefringence of AlGaAs/GaAs Coatings under Above-Band-Gap Illumination, GR Noise and Photo-Optic Transfer Function

AlGaAs/GaAs coatings are being considered as coating candidates for gravitational-wave detectors. In this paper we investigate the birefringence properties of this crystalline semiconductor material by modulating the optical illumination on the mirror coating and monitoring the induced birefringence. While the measured low-frequency birefringence values align with previous studies, we observed a frequency-dependent behavior in the illumination-to-birefringence coupling, characterized by a pole increasing with illumination intensity and a gain at zero frequency (DC gain) decreasing with illumination intensity. We developed a generic theoretical model based on a master equation to characterize the measurement results by considering photon-induced electric fields and electro-optic effects. This model can fit the frequency and intensity dependencies of the induced birefringence. Additionally, this model predicts a generation-recombination noise (GR noise) will be observable in the coating birefringence. While the presented measurement cannot predict the exact level of GR noise, for the frequency band and spot sizes relevant for gravitational-wave detectors we expect GR noise to be white below the pole frequency, scale with power the same way laser shot noise does, and for fixed power be independent of spot size.

physics.ins-det↗