SEARCH · arXiv Science
Search indexed arXiv papers on artificial intelligence, large language models, computer vision and robotics. Read source abstracts and follow links to arXiv.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
We prove two simple bivariate recurrences for the number of permutations with a long increasing subsequence. The two recurrences imply D-finiteness of the sequence in a certain range. As a consequence, we also obtain a proof of a conjecture posed by Kauers and Koutschan in 2023.
Determining the complexity of computing Gröbner bases is an important problem in both theory and practice, and solving degrees provide a central measure of this complexity. We study solving degrees and Gröbner basis computations for affine polynomial systems, with particular emphasis on semi-regular sequences. We first derive two upper bounds for the maximum Gröbner basis degree of the homogenized system. One is based on a regular initial subsequence of the highest-degree homogeneous parts. When these parts form a semi-regular sequence in nondecreasing degree order, the bound involves the $n$ smallest input degrees together with the largest one. The other bound is expressed in terms of the saturation exponent with respect to the homogenizing variable. Both are obtained by bounding the degree from which the Hilbert function of the quotient ring associated with the homogenized system is constant. We then compare the Buchberger-like Gröbner basis computations for an affine system, its homogenization, and its highest-degree homogeneous parts. The first degree fall is characterized by failure of injectivity of multiplication by the homogenizing variable. Before that point, choices of S-pairs and reducers in any computation can be matched in the others, and reduction sequences, remainders, intermediate bases, and leading monomials correspond under specialization. Cryptographic semi-regularity guarantees this correspondence until the step degree first reaches the degree of regularity. At that degree, affine reduction steps that preserve the sugar degree lift to homogeneous ones, yielding upper bounds on the algorithmic solving degree for a computation starting directly from the affine input.
Let \( \mathcal{S}_{g,n} \subset \mathcal{M}_g \) be the locus of curves of genus \( g \geq 2 \) admitting a model \( y^n = h(x) \) with \( h \) separable; such curves $C$ have a cyclic group \( C_n \leq \operatorname{Aut}(C) \) of order \( n \) with \( C/C_n \cong \mathbb{P}^1 \). % We give an algorithm which, given an absolutely irreducible plane model \( F(x,y) = 0 \) of a curve \( C \) over a field \( k_0 \) of characteristic zero, decides for which \( n \) the curve lies in \( \mathcal{S}_{g,n} \) and returns a model \( y^n = h(x) \) together with the birational transformation to it.
This article solves the Indefinite Summation Problem (ISP) for the difference ring $(A, α)$, where $A$ is the Laurent ring of shift operators on the lattice $\Z^n$, and $α$ is any ring automorphism of $A$ of finite order. The solution translates to a finite procedure involving a matrix multiplication, where the size of the matrix can be estimated. It follows that the arithmetic complexity of the solution can also be determined. These results extend to a solution of the ISP for the ring of functions on $\Z^n$, on which $α$ acts by duality. The article points out that the solution to the ISP amounts to calculating the group cohomologies $H^i([α], A), i = 0, 1$, where $[α]$ is the cyclic group generated by $α$.
Language models exhibit fundamental limitations -- hallucination, brittleness, and lack of formal grounding -- that are particularly problematic in high-stakes specialist fields requiring verifiable reasoning. I investigate whether formal domain ontologies can enhance language model reliability through retrieval-augmented generation. Using mathematics as proof of concept, I implement a neuro-symbolic pipeline leveraging the OpenMath ontology with hybrid retrieval and cross-encoder reranking to inject relevant definitions into model prompts. Evaluation on the MATH benchmark with three open-source models reveals that ontology-guided context improves performance when retrieval quality is high, but irrelevant context actively degrades it -- highlighting both the promise and challenges of neuro-symbolic approaches.
We develop a notion of standard bases for subgroups of the restricted direct product $G^{(\mathbb{N}^n)}$ that are stable under translation by $\mathbb{N}^n$, where $G$ is an arbitrary finite group. We construct an algorithm that computes standard bases for such subgroups and use them to solve several algorithmic problems, including membership, saturation, and variable elimination. Our approach is inspired by Buchberger's algorithm and the theory of Gröbner bases for ideals in polynomial rings. Building on the standard bases and our solutions to the algorithmic problems above, we prove that Subgroup Membership is decidable in wreath products $G \wr \mathbb{Z}^n$ for finite $G$ and $n \in \mathbb{N}$.
A zero-one matrix is a matrix with entries from $\{0, 1\}$. We study monoids containing only such matrices. A finite set of zero-one matrices generating such a monoid can be seen as the matrix representation of an unambiguous finite automaton, an important generalisation of deterministic finite automata which shares many of their good properties. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a finite set of $n \times n$ zero-one matrices generating a monoid of zero-one matrices, and $m$ be the cardinality of $\mathcal{A}$. We study the computational complexity of computing the minimum rank of a matrix in the monoid generated by $\mathcal{A}$. By using linear-algebraic techniques, we show that this problem is in $\textsf{NC}$ and can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(mn^4)$ time and $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ space. We also provide a combinatorial algorithm finding a matrix of minimum rank in $\mathcal{O}(mn^4)$ time and $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ space. As a byproduct, we show a very weak version of a generalisation of the Černý conjecture: there always exists a straight line program of size $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ describing a product resulting in a matrix of minimum rank. For the special case corresponding to total DFAs (that is, for the case where all matrices have exactly one 1 in each row), the minimum rank is the size of the smallest image of the set of all states under the action of a word. Our combinatorial algorithm finds a matrix of minimum rank in time $\mathcal{O}(n^3 + mn^2)$ in this case.
We propose a neurobiologically plausible model of cognition that combines the advantages of connectionist and symbolic systems, and that can explain a wide range of cognitive phenomena. This model, called Rate-Coding Bundle Memory (RCBM), is based on the Symbolic Subsystem Hypothesis, which posits that the brain implements a symbolic subsystem within its fundamentally connectionist nature. RCBM is a hybrid model that uses rate coding to represent symbols in a continuous space, and it uses a bundle memory system to store and retrieve these symbols. The model is capable of solving a wide range of cognitive phenomena, including one-shot learning, pattern separation, and the binding problem. We argue that RCBM provides a promising framework for understanding the nature of cognition, and that it can be used to develop more sophisticated models of cognition in the future.
Integer sequences from the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) are increasingly used to benchmark mathematical reasoning in language models. We ask what such benchmarks actually measure, using an exactly computable reference learner: two-part minimum description length (MDL) over the class of P-recursive (holonomic) recurrences, evaluated on every prefix of a sequence as terms arrive. Three findings follow. First, MDL difficulty is a parameter count. The discovery point nd, the first prefix length at which a symbolic hypothesis beats verbatim storage, is predicted almost exactly by a combinatorial identifiability bound on the selected operator's order and degree. It is invariant to term magnitude: scaling Fibonacci over twelve orders of magnitude leaves nd unchanged, because a hypothesis must encode its own initial conditions and the magnitude cancels. Second, at scale the learner exhibits a regime our curated corpus could not produce even once: across 20,000 OEIS sequences, 89.98% of those that fit a recurrence on some prefix fit none at full length. We call this the wilderness -- induction acquires a theory, loses it, and never recovers. Third, evaluating three language models on sequences stratified by these MDL regimes refuted our pre-registered hypothesis: models do not confabulate where MDL reports no theory, but hedge appropriately. Confident errors are inverted, concentrating on the easy stratum, where apparent competence tracks recognition of the sequence rather than induction of its rule. OEIS-derived benchmarks therefore substantially measure memorisation, and MDL supplies a cheap, contamination-free difficulty signal they currently lack. Code and data are released.
Symbolic regression has emerged as a powerful tool for artificial intelligence-driven scientific discovery by learning interpretable analytical expressions that reveal governing relationships directly from data. Existing methods, however, often rely on heuristic search, struggle to balance predictive accuracy with expression complexity in noisy settings, and offer limited characterization of symbolic uncertainty. Probabilistic approaches that address these challenges in a unified manner remain underexplored. We introduce a probabilistic symbolic regression framework that represents mathematical expressions as ensembles of symbolic trees. A regularizing prior over tree topology controls expression complexity, while an Occam's window-based posterior summary captures uncertainty across multiple plausible symbolic models. Given the limited existing theoretical treatment of symbolic regression, we develop posterior concentration guarantees when symbolic expressions approximate the underlying relationship arbitrarily well, with a near-parametric rate when an exact finite formula exists. Additionally, we establish a sharp oracle concentration result under symbolic misspecification. Comparisons of our proposed framework with state-of-the-art competitors demonstrate superior predictive accuracy, optimal symbolic complexity, and stable structural recovery when learning benchmark scientific equations, together with the identification of scientifically interpretable descriptor formulas in a challenging materials discovery application.
The efficiency of Gröbner basis computation, the standard engine for solving systems of polynomial equations, depends on the choice of monomial ordering. Despite a near-continuum of possible monomial orders, most implementations rely on static heuristics such as GrevLex, guided primarily by expert intuition. We address this gap by casting the selection of monomial orderings as a reinforcement learning problem over the space of admissible orderings. Our approach leverages domain-informed reward signals that accurately reflect the computational cost of Gröbner basis computations and admits efficient Monte Carlo estimation. Experiments on benchmark problems from systems biology and computer vision show that the resulting learned policies consistently outperform standard heuristics, yielding substantial reductions in computational cost. Moreover, we find that these policies resist distillation into simple interpretable models, providing empirical evidence that deep reinforcement learning allows the agents to exploit non-linear geometric structure beyond the scope of traditional heuristics.