arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.29189

Rate-Coding Bundle Memory: A Unified Model of Memory and Control for Symbolic Computation in the Brain

Teun van Gils·Rowan P. Sommers·Markus Ostarek·Peter Hagoort
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We propose a neurobiologically plausible model of cognition that combines the advantages of connectionist and symbolic systems, and that can explain a wide range of cognitive phenomena. This model, called Rate-Coding Bundle Memory (RCBM), is based on the Symbolic Subsystem Hypothesis, which posits that the brain implements a symbolic subsystem within its fundamentally connectionist nature. RCBM is a hybrid model that uses rate coding to represent symbols in a continuous space, and it uses a bundle memory system to store and retrieve these symbols. The model is capable of solving a wide range of cognitive phenomena, including one-shot learning, pattern separation, and the binding problem. We argue that RCBM provides a promising framework for understanding the nature of cognition, and that it can be used to develop more sophisticated models of cognition in the future.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NCcs.AIcs.CLcs.SC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Teun van Gils, Rowan P. Sommers, Markus Ostarek, Peter Hagoort. 2026-08-29. Rate-Coding Bundle Memory: A Unified Model of Memory and Control for Symbolic Computation in the Brain. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29189

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.CL subjectcs.SC subjectq-bio.NC subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Interpretable Symptom Vectors for Depression in a Large Language Model

Patients with depression present with diverse symptom profiles, yet clinical practice routinely reduces this variation to a single severity score. Large language models (LLMs) can potentially capture various symptoms and their severity from patient speech. However, how depressive symptoms are represented inside LLMs remains poorly understood, limiting clinical trust. To examine whether internal model activations match clinician judgment, we analyzed the residual stream of Gemma-3-27B-PT using mechanistic interpretability techniques. Recording activations across symptom descriptions drawn from validated clinical instruments, we found that symptom groups geometrically separated the most at layer 21 across multiple distance metrics. Using Semantic Projection, we then projected held-out naturalistic text onto Symptom Vectors constructed from these instruments. The resulting per-symptom coefficients preserved clinician-annotated rank ordering across mood, somatic, and suicidality axes. Furthermore, a single depression vector in Layer 21 separates held-out depressive from non-depressive text (AUC = 0.789), which can be used as an emotional valence gate that restricts symptom projection to depressive speech. These results reveal a decorrelated, clinician-aligned symptom signal readable directly from internal activations, offering a mechanistic foundation for interpretable depression-assessment tools.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Leakage-Audited Benchmarking Reveals Limited Evidence for Cross-Subject Auditory-Evoked EEG Vowel Perception Decoding

We tested whether auditory-evoked EEG supports subject-independent five-vowel perception decoding when trial identity, model identity, prediction provenance, and participant-level inference are controlled within a single benchmark. We reconstructed Study 2 event tables from OpenNeuro ds006104 version 1.0.1 and analysed the consonant-vowel pair task. One-to-one marker-stimulus pairing yielded 3,840 independent trials; control-condition selection and artifact rejection retained 1,094 epochs from 16 participants and 61 EEG channels. Thirteen unique implementations were evaluated using leave-one-subject-out testing, with participant metrics reconstructed from 36,102 trial predictions across 33 complete prediction replicas. Random Forest was numerically highest at 21.474% balanced accuracy (95% participant-bootstrap interval, 19.526-23.482%; chance, 20%), but neither its participant-level tests nor any implementation survived correction across the 13-model family. Deep-model performance was close to chance, and several architectures showed substantial seed-dependent variation and low trial-label agreement. An exploratory MDM analysis comprising 9,616 genuine refits across training cohorts of 3-15 participants showed no monotonic performance gain. Within this dataset and protocol, evidence for reliable cross-subject five-vowel decoding is limited. The benchmark provides a reproducible chain from source rows to retained epochs, predictions, participant-level metrics, multiplicity-adjusted inference, and bounded diagnostic analyses.

eess.SP↗
arXiv2026

On a Geometry of Interbrain Networks

Effective analysis in neuroscience benefits significantly from robust conceptual frameworks. Traditional metrics of interbrain synchrony in social neuroscience typically depend on fixed, correlation-based approaches, restricting their explanatory capacity to descriptive observations. Inspired by the successful integration of geometric insights in network science, we propose leveraging discrete geometry to examine the dynamic reconfigurations in neural interactions during social exchanges. Unlike conventional synchrony approaches, our method interprets inter-brain connectivity changes through the evolving geometric structures of neural networks. This geometric framework is realized through a pipeline that identifies critical transitions in network connectivity using entropy metrics derived from curvature distributions. By doing so, we significantly enhance the capacity of hyperscanning methodologies to uncover underlying neural mechanisms in interactive social behavior.

q-bio.NC↗