arXiv Science⌕ Search

subject

cs.GT

cs.GT: explore 107 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

arXiv2026

The Endogeneity of Miscalibration: Impossibility and Escape in Scored Reporting

An agent's probability report is paid for twice: by a strictly proper scoring rule, and by an approval rule for the decision it triggers. In this classical decision-coupled setting, non-affine approval is known to defeat truthful reporting. We show the conflict is endogenous: when feasible, the welfare-maximizing approval rule is never affine. The distortion, however, is predictable and can be designed around. There is a reserve report at which pretending to be the marginal type costs exactly the approval prize. Approving at or above the reserve screens types perfectly under every strictly proper score, and the reserve does not depend on the type distribution. A Lipschitz rule with a single kink attains first-best exactly; under strict feasibility no continuously differentiable rule does. The binding constraint is steepness, not smoothness. First-best is attainable within a slope budget if and only if the budget is at least the critical slope: the steepest chord of the pretending cost up to the reserve. Below it the welfare loss is cubic in the shortfall. Where the pretending cost is convex up to the reserve, as for Brier, log and power scores, the critical slope is closed-form. The instances are AI-agent oversight and marketplace operation.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Security Games on Series-Parallel Attack Graphs with Adaptive Attackers

We study security games on attack graphs, where an adaptive attacker seeks to reach a target by sequentially attempting stochastic controls along the current attack frontier, while a defender allocates limited resources across controls to delay compromise. The attacker may choose among exponentially many attack routes and freely pivot between them as successes and failures are observed, yielding an exponentially large space of contingent attack policies. For any fixed defender allocation, we show that an optimal attacker policy on a two-terminal series-parallel attack graph is an index policy: at each step, the attacker selects an available control with the largest value of an extension of the classical Gittins index. The indices and the resulting attacker best response can be computed in polynomial time, without explicitly enumerating attack paths or contingent policies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first optimal index characterization for adaptive attackers in security games on general series-parallel attack graphs. We further develop efficient algorithms for computing the attacker's exact utility and an exact defender subgradient, enabling deterministic first-order optimization of defensive resource allocations without sampling attack trajectories. Our framework strictly generalizes prior approaches restricted to parallel chains and out-trees, while exploiting the compositional structure of series-parallel graphs to support interpretable attacker policies and parallel computation across independent subgraphs. Experiments demonstrate that the resulting methods scale substantially better than naive explicit-state approaches while producing effective defensive allocations.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Randomized Strategyproof Facility Location: Two Facilities and Beyond

We design and analyze randomized strategyproof mechanisms for multi-facility location under the utilitarian social-cost objective, the sum of the agents' distances to their nearest facilities. For two facilities, the Pairwise-Distance mechanism locates facilities at a pair of reported locations sampled with probability proportional to their distance. It is strategyproof on Ptolemaic spaces, including Euclidean and Hilbert spaces as special cases, and has an approximation ratio of \(4\). The resulting Hybrid-Distance mechanism is a fixed-probability mixture: it selects the classical Proportional mechanism [Lu et al., EC'10] with probability \(λ^*=\frac{5+4\sqrt3}{23}\) and Pairwise-Distance with probability $1-λ^*$. It is strategyproof on Ptolemaic spaces and has a tight approximation ratio of \(\frac{74+4\sqrt3}{23}\approx3.5186\), breaking the long-standing factor-\(4\) benchmark of [Lu et al., EC'10]. We complement the two-facility results by studying more facilities. First, for \(n\) agents and \(k=n-1\) facilities, we introduce the Inverse-Square mechanism, which omits one report with probability proportional to the inverse square of its nearest-neighbor distance and locates facilities at all remaining reports. It is strategyproof on any metric space and has an approximation ratio of \(Θ(\sqrt{n})\), improving the previous best-known ratio of \(\frac{n}{2}\) [Escoffier et al., ADT'11]. Second, for $k$ facilities on the line, we introduce the Gap-Product mechanism, which locates facilities at \(k\) reports and weights each set by the product of the gaps between consecutive selected reports. When \(k=3\), it is strategyproof and has a \(6\)-approximation, replacing the previous \(n\)-dependent guarantee [Fotakis and Tzamos, EC'13] by a constant, whereas it is not strategyproof for any \(k\ge4\).

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

AI Alignment through a Game-theoretic Lens: A Survey

As large language models and increasingly capable AI agents are deployed in high-risk settings, aligning them with complex human values has become a central challenge. Existing alignment methods, while effective in improving helpfulness, harmlessness, and controllability, often struggle to capture real-world preferences that are context-dependent, non-transitive, and shaped by dynamic multi-party interactions. This survey reviews AI alignment through a game-theoretic lens. Specifically, it organizes recent progress around key game-theoretic elements and synthesizes the literature along three challenges: preference diversity, alignment priority, and temporal dynamics. This perspective clarifies where current alignment methods genuinely benefit from game-theoretic analysis, where the framework is looser, and what challenges remain in building robust, adaptive, and verifiable AI systems.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Independent Reinforcement Learning in Discounted Markov Games

In this work, we study radically uncoupled learning in discounted general-sum Markov games. Assuming ``$\mathsf{ETH}$ for $\mathsf{PPAD}$", we show that, for every fixed discount factor, there is no polynomial-time algorithm for computing inverse-polynomially accurate coarse correlated equilibria in discounted general-sum Markov games when players learn independently in decentralized settings. Complementing this hardness result, we provide what appears to be the first \emph{radically uncoupled} algorithm with sub-exponential convergence guarantees to coarse correlated equilibria in discounted general-sum Markov games without imposing any structural restrictions on the game. Our algorithm is a \emph{layered} variant of optimistic mirror descent with an increasing step-size schedule tailored to the multi-agent setting. Finally, we develop both full-feedback and partial feedback versions of the aforementioned algorithm and establish sub-exponential convergence guarantees for each case.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Graph Coloring with Color Preferences

We study graph coloring with color preferences, in which each vertex ranks the available colors. In addition to assigning different colors to adjacent vertices, we require the coloring to be stable: no group of vertices can cyclically exchange their assigned colors so that each strictly prefers its new color to its original one. We define the stable chromatic number $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$ of a graph $G$ as the minimum integer $k$ such that every preference profile admits a stable $k$-coloring of $G$. We establish several upper and lower bounds. In particular, for any acyclic orientation of the edges of $G$, the largest number of vertices reachable from a vertex by directed paths, including the vertex itself, is an upper bound on $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$. This shows that $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$ is well-defined. We also show that $O(t \log (1+n/t))$ colors suffice for an $n$-vertex graph $G$ of treewidth $t$, and complement this with a lower bound in terms of the Grundy number. Turning to the problem of finding a minimum stable coloring for a given profile, we show that stable $2$-colorability is polynomial-time solvable, whereas stable $k$-colorability is NP-complete for every fixed $k\ge 3$. Using the treewidth bound, we give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by treewidth.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Construction of a DFA for Computing Grundy Numbers in the Successful Derivation Games on Right-Linear Grammars

Inoue et al. have introduced the successful derivation game (SDG) on context-free grammars (CFGs), which is a generalization of classic heap-based games including subtraction games and Keyles, and shown that the least upper bound of the Grundy numbers in the SDG on a given CFG G is undecidable in general even when we restrict G to be a linear CFG. This paper shows that for the SDG on a right-linear grammar (RLG), we can construct a DFA for computing the Grundy number of a given position. In other words, for the SDG on an RLG, the set of positions with a given Grundy number c is regular. As a corollary, the least upper bound of the Grundy numbers in the SDG on a given RLG is decidable. We also investigate the complexity of computing the least upper bound of the Grundy numbers in the SDG on a given RLG, and it is shown to be PSPACE-complete.

cs.FL↗
arXiv2026

Mechanism Design for Alignment and Control

We develop a framework for mechanism design with AI agents whose alignment (preferences) and capabilities (feasible actions and information) are unknown. We want such agents to act on our behalf so mechanisms must incentivize both honesty and obedience. A one-sided imitation structure---capabilities can be concealed but not counterfeited---yields a revelation principle, a characterization of implementable policies via nested cyclical monotonicity, and conditions under which eliciting higher-order beliefs can discipline multiple agents. We apply our framework to stylized examples of (i) sandbagging in which a more capable agent pretends to be less capable; (ii) an alignment--interpretability trade-off, where the two are substitutes in the instrument but complements in value; (iii) discipline via peer scoring; (iv) coupling rewards to induce competition among multiple agents; and (v) scalable oversight and reward shaping.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2026

When Does Information Sharing Improve Decentralized Discovery? Aggregation, Independent Rescue, and Equilibrium Selection

Information sharing can improve a pooled estimate while eliminating independent rescue actions. This paper separates those effects in exact finite discovery models. A centralized action-budget profile shows that equal one-person accuracy can coexist with different portfolio values. Under a registered incremental-sharing protocol, a sharing step improves discovery exactly when pooled residual error contracts faster than an independent rescue attempt. Exact bounded registries exhibit compression, aggregation, neutral curves, and a bounded zero mixed class. In a two-agent Bayesian game with a hidden mixture of common and independent signal sources, the registered selected equilibrium yields a strict positive sharing interval at signal accuracy 3/5, while alternative equilibria show that the result is selection-dependent rather than universal. The models are synthetic and finite; no human or organizational data are used.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

The Power of Static Pricing for Reusable Resources

We consider the problem of pricing a reusable resource service system. Potential customers arrive according to a Poisson process and purchase the service if their valuation exceeds the current price. If no units are available, customers immediately leave without service. Serving a customer corresponds to using one unit of the reusable resource, where the service time has a general distribution. The objective is to maximize the steady-state revenue rate. This system is equivalent to the classical Erlang loss model with price-sensitive customers, which has applications in vehicle sharing, cloud computing, and spare parts management. With general service times, the optimal pricing policy depends not only on the number of customers currently in the system but also on how long each unavailable unit has been in use. We prove several results that show a simple static policy is universally near-optimal for any service time distribution, arrival rate, and number of units in the system. When there are multiple classes of customers with regular valuation distributions, we prove that static pricing guarantees 78.9% of the revenue of the optimal dynamic policy, achieving the same guarantee known for a single class of customers with exponential service times. When there is one class of customers who have a monotone hazard rate valuation distribution, we prove that a static pricing policy guarantees 97.5% of the revenue from the optimal inventory-based policy. In addition, we prove that the optimal static policy can be easily computed, resulting in the first polynomial-time approximation algorithm for the multi-class problem. Finally, we consider the extensions to irregular valuation distributions and general multi-resource networks.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Expected flow networks in stochastic environments and two-player zero-sum games

Generative flow networks (GFlowNets) are sequential sampling models trained to match a given distribution. GFlowNets have been successfully applied to various structured object generation tasks, sampling a diverse set of high-reward objects quickly. We propose expected flow networks (EFlowNets), which extend GFlowNets to stochastic environments. We show that EFlowNets outperform other GFlowNet formulations in stochastic tasks such as protein design. We then extend the concept of EFlowNets to adversarial environments, proposing adversarial flow networks (AFlowNets) for two-player zero-sum games. We show that AFlowNets learn to find above 80% of optimal moves in Connect-4 via self-play and outperform AlphaZero in tournaments.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Algorithmic Collusion by Large Language Models

We conduct experiments with algorithmic pricing agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs). In oligopoly settings, LLM-based pricing agents quickly and autonomously reach supracompetitive prices and profits. Variation in seemingly innocuous phrases in LLM instructions ("prompts") substantially influence the degree of supracompetitive pricing. We develop novel techniques for behavioral analysis of LLMs and use them to uncover price-war concerns as a contributing factor. Our results extend to auction settings. Our findings uncover unique challenges to any future regulation of LLM-based pricing agents, and AI-based pricing agents more broadly.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

On the Equivalence of the Graph-Structural and Optimization-Based Characterizations of Popular Matchings

Popular matchings provide a model of matching under preferences in which a solution corresponds to a Condorcet winner in voting systems. In a bipartite graph in which the vertices have preferences over their neighbours, a matching is defined to be popular if it does not lose in a majority vote against any matching. In this paper, we study the following three primary problems: only the vertices on one side have preferences; a generalization of this problem allowing ties in the preferences; and the vertices on both sides have preferences. A principal issue in the algorithmic aspects of popular matchings is how to determine the popularity of a matching, because it requires exponential time if the definition is simply applied. In the literature, we have the following two types of characterizations: a graph-structural characterization; and an optimization-based characterization described by maximum-weight matchings. The graph-structural characterizations are specifically designed for each problem and provide a combinatorial structure of the popular matchings. The optimization-based characterizations work in the same manner for all problems, while they do not reveal the structure of the popular matchings. A main contribution of this paper is to provide a direct connection of the above two types of characterizations for all of the three problems. Specifically, we prove that each characterization can be derived from the other, without relying on the fact that they characterize popular matchings. Our proofs offer a comprehensive understanding of the equivalence of the two types of characterizations, and suggest a new interpretation of the graph-structural characterization in terms of the dual optimal solution for the maximum-weight matching problem.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Make an Offer They Can't Refuse: Grounding Bayesian Persuasion in Real-World Dialogues without Pre-Commitment

Large language models (LLMs) still struggle with strategic persuasion, largely because existing approaches either neglect information asymmetry or rely on unrealistic pre-commitment assumptions. We introduce a type-induced commitment-communication mechanism that grounds Bayesian Persuasion (BP) in natural language dialogue without pre-commitment: the persuader narrates their potential types (e.g., honest vs. dishonest) to dynamically construct an information schema, enabling the persuadee to perform Bayesian belief updates within the conversation itself. We implement two variants: Semi-Formal-Natural-Language (SFNL) and Fully-Natural-Language (FNL), evaluating them against strong baselines across multiple LLMs and human judges. BP strategies consistently outperform baselines: SFNL excels in logical credibility, while FNL shows superior robustness and emotional resonance. We verify that gains stem from genuine Bayesian reasoning rather than superficial formatting, and we further show that supervised fine-tuning enables small models to match the persuasive performance of much larger ones.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Individualized Algorithmic Advice as a Strategic Signal on Competitive Markets

As algorithms increasingly mediate competitive decision-making, their influence extends beyond individual outcomes to shaping strategic market dynamics. In our experiment, we examined how algorithmic advice affects human behavior in a classic economic game with a unique, non-collusive, and analytically traceable equilibrium. Participants (N = 129) played a Cournot quantity competition with equilibrium-aligned or strategically biased algorithmic recommendations. While individualized equilibrium advice supported stable convergence, collusively downward-biased advice led to sustained underproduction and supracompetitive profits - hallmarks of tacit collusion. Participants' quantities converged faster and more consistently toward individualized than collective equilibrium advice, potentially due to an objective quality advantage or greater perceived ownership of the former. These findings demonstrate that algorithmic advice can function as a strategic signal, shaping coordination even without explicit communication. The results echo real-world concerns about algorithmic collusion and underscore the need for careful design and oversight of algorithmic decision-support systems in competitive environments.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Learning Proportional Committees from Violation Feedback

We study violation-feedback learning of proportionally representative approval-based committees. In each round, a learner proposes a committee of size $k$. An oracle either accepts the proposal or adversarially selects a representation violation with respect to a single fixed hidden approval profile. We compare \emph{full-witness feedback}, which reveals the violation level, an omitted candidate, and the affected voter group, with \emph{candidate-only feedback}, which reveals only that candidate. The target notions are proportional justified representation plus (PJR+) and extended justified representation plus (EJR+). In every setting we study, the number of rejected proposals can be bounded solely in terms of $k$, with no dependence on the numbers of voters and candidates. For PJR+, the optimal deterministic and randomized rejection complexities equal $k$ under both feedback models. For EJR+, the picture is more nuanced. Under full-witness feedback, we prove an $Ω(k^{3/2})$ deterministic lower bound and give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm using $O(k^2\log k)$ rejections. Under candidate-only feedback, randomization achieves $O(k^2\log k)$ expected rejections via uniform random deletion, while deterministic exhaustive branching gives a $2^{O(k^2(\log k)^2)}$ rejection bound. Even with full-witness feedback, randomized learners may require $k$ rejections.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Rival-Injective Allocations: Support-List Structure and Maximum-Anchor EFX$_0$ Certificates

We study complete allocations under nonnegative additive valuations through the positive supports of goods, focusing on the all-good form of envy-freeness up to any good (EFX$_0$). We define rival-injective (RI) endpoint ownership: every good with nonempty positive support is assigned to an agent who values it positively, and every ordered observer--owner pair is used by at most one good. RI ownership is exactly proper list coloring of the graph joining goods whose positive supports overlap in at least two agents. For pair-supported goods with arbitrary exceptional goods, fixing the exceptional owners yields a necessary-and-sufficient pair-capacity criterion and an exact finite-domain owner constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). Every RI allocation in which each agent's own bundle is worth at least her maximum-valued singleton is all-good EFX$_0$. A specified injective choice of maximum-singleton anchors, together with residual support-list degeneracy, constructs such an allocation by reverse greedy coloring in $O(nm^2)$ time. We give two explicit witness families: a nonempty relatively open, 22-dimensional cone on a fixed $4\times10$ support face, and a family for every $n\ge4$ with two universal-support goods and $m=(n-1)(n-2)+2$ goods. Both fail unanchored list degeneracy and are not implied by the explicit pure-multigraph or published high-girth/controlled-multiplicity hypotheses compared here. We also study recognition of the maximum-anchor certificate class, leaving its general complexity unresolved. The exact list-coloring and pair-capacity results concern RI ownership, not general EFX$_0$ existence; unrestricted four-agent, ten-good all-good EFX$_0$ remains unresolved.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Residual Maximin Share: Exact Finite-Agent Frontier, Sparse Extremizers, and Threshold Cuts

Residual maximin share (RMMS) is the largest share threshold that remains guaranteeable throughout dynamic allocation processes, even after previously allocated, lower-valued bundles are removed from the item pool. For additive valuations, recent density-balance analyses established finite-agent lower bounds comparing RMMS with the classical maximin share (MMS). In this paper, we prove that these finite-agent lower bounds are exact. Specifically, if $d_n$ denotes the largest odd integer at most $n$, the worst-case ratio satisfies $\inf_{M,v:\operatorname{MMS}>0}\frac{\operatorname{RMMS}(M,v,n)}{\operatorname{MMS}(M,v,n)}=\frac{2d_n}{3d_n-1}$. Consequently, the exact additive frontier forms consecutive odd-even plateaus and converges monotonically to $2/3$. We then investigate the combinatorial structure of extremal instances. While naive witnesses require $Θ(n^2)$ items, we construct an explicit three-valued family achieving the exact boundary with only linear support: $(5n-3)/2$ items for odd $n$ and $(5n-4)/2$ items for even $n$. Its low-valued block supports two exact partitions that simultaneously certify the MMS benchmark and the residual obstruction. By modeling these dual partitions as a bipartite transportation graph, we prove that this block attains the absolute minimum support $q+d-1=3q$. At minimum support, any two-valued filler is uniquely rigid up to relabeling. Finally, we establish structural characterizations of RMMS. A general min--max representation applies to all finite monotone valuations. For integer additive valuations, we prove that a threshold $T$ is residual self-feasible if and only if every subset cut satisfies a packing-covering condition. Because RMMS is pointwise maximal among residual self-feasible shares, these exact constants establish a tight limitation on the fairness guarantees achievable by share-based lone-divider algorithms.

cs.GT↗
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
The Endogeneity of Miscalibration: Impossibility and Escape in Scored Reporting2026-09-012605.07671arxiv
Security Games on Series-Parallel Attack Graphs with Adaptive Attackers2026-09-012608.21259arxiv
Randomized Strategyproof Facility Location: Two Facilities and Beyond2026-09-012608.22484arxiv
AI Alignment through a Game-theoretic Lens: A Survey2026-09-012608.27910arxiv
Independent Reinforcement Learning in Discounted Markov Games2026-09-012609.00504arxiv
Graph Coloring with Color Preferences2026-09-012609.00569arxiv
Construction of a DFA for Computing Grundy Numbers in the Successful Derivation Games on Right-Linear Grammars2026-09-012609.00871arxiv
Mechanism Design for Alignment and Control2026-09-012609.01595arxiv
When Does Information Sharing Improve Decentralized Discovery? Aggregation, Independent Rescue, and Equilibrium Selection2026-09-012609.01814arxiv
The Power of Static Pricing for Reusable Resources2026-08-312302.11723arxiv
Expected flow networks in stochastic environments and two-player zero-sum games2026-08-312310.02779arxiv
Algorithmic Collusion by Large Language Models2026-08-312404.00806arxiv
On the Equivalence of the Graph-Structural and Optimization-Based Characterizations of Popular Matchings2026-08-312508.00349arxiv
Make an Offer They Can't Refuse: Grounding Bayesian Persuasion in Real-World Dialogues without Pre-Commitment2026-08-312510.13387arxiv
Individualized Algorithmic Advice as a Strategic Signal on Competitive Markets2026-08-312511.09454arxiv
Learning Proportional Committees from Violation Feedback2026-08-312608.30111arxiv
Rival-Injective Allocations: Support-List Structure and Maximum-Anchor EFX$_0$ Certificates2026-08-312608.30203arxiv
Residual Maximin Share: Exact Finite-Agent Frontier, Sparse Extremizers, and Threshold Cuts2026-08-312608.30257arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.