arXiv Science⌕ Search

subject

cs.GT

cs.GT: explore 69 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

arXiv2026

Individualized Algorithmic Advice as a Strategic Signal on Competitive Markets

As algorithms increasingly mediate competitive decision-making, their influence extends beyond individual outcomes to shaping strategic market dynamics. In our experiment, we examined how algorithmic advice affects human behavior in a classic economic game with a unique, non-collusive, and analytically traceable equilibrium. Participants (N = 129) played a Cournot quantity competition with equilibrium-aligned or strategically biased algorithmic recommendations. While individualized equilibrium advice supported stable convergence, collusively downward-biased advice led to sustained underproduction and supracompetitive profits - hallmarks of tacit collusion. Participants' quantities converged faster and more consistently toward individualized than collective equilibrium advice, potentially due to an objective quality advantage or greater perceived ownership of the former. These findings demonstrate that algorithmic advice can function as a strategic signal, shaping coordination even without explicit communication. The results echo real-world concerns about algorithmic collusion and underscore the need for careful design and oversight of algorithmic decision-support systems in competitive environments.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Learning Proportional Committees from Violation Feedback

We study violation-feedback learning of proportionally representative approval-based committees. In each round, a learner proposes a committee of size $k$. An oracle either accepts the proposal or adversarially selects a representation violation with respect to a single fixed hidden approval profile. We compare \emph{full-witness feedback}, which reveals the violation level, an omitted candidate, and the affected voter group, with \emph{candidate-only feedback}, which reveals only that candidate. The target notions are proportional justified representation plus (PJR+) and extended justified representation plus (EJR+). In every setting we study, the number of rejected proposals can be bounded solely in terms of $k$, with no dependence on the numbers of voters and candidates. For PJR+, the optimal deterministic and randomized rejection complexities equal $k$ under both feedback models. For EJR+, the picture is more nuanced. Under full-witness feedback, we prove an $Ω(k^{3/2})$ deterministic lower bound and give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm using $O(k^2\log k)$ rejections. Under candidate-only feedback, randomization achieves $O(k^2\log k)$ expected rejections via uniform random deletion, while deterministic exhaustive branching gives a $2^{O(k^2(\log k)^2)}$ rejection bound. Even with full-witness feedback, randomized learners may require $k$ rejections.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Rival-Injective Allocations: Support-List Structure and Maximum-Anchor EFX$_0$ Certificates

We study complete allocations under nonnegative additive valuations through the positive supports of goods, focusing on the all-good form of envy-freeness up to any good (EFX$_0$). We define rival-injective (RI) endpoint ownership: every good with nonempty positive support is assigned to an agent who values it positively, and every ordered observer--owner pair is used by at most one good. RI ownership is exactly proper list coloring of the graph joining goods whose positive supports overlap in at least two agents. For pair-supported goods with arbitrary exceptional goods, fixing the exceptional owners yields a necessary-and-sufficient pair-capacity criterion and an exact finite-domain owner constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). Every RI allocation in which each agent's own bundle is worth at least her maximum-valued singleton is all-good EFX$_0$. A specified injective choice of maximum-singleton anchors, together with residual support-list degeneracy, constructs such an allocation by reverse greedy coloring in $O(nm^2)$ time. We give two explicit witness families: a nonempty relatively open, 22-dimensional cone on a fixed $4\times10$ support face, and a family for every $n\ge4$ with two universal-support goods and $m=(n-1)(n-2)+2$ goods. Both fail unanchored list degeneracy and are not implied by the explicit pure-multigraph or published high-girth/controlled-multiplicity hypotheses compared here. We also study recognition of the maximum-anchor certificate class, leaving its general complexity unresolved. The exact list-coloring and pair-capacity results concern RI ownership, not general EFX$_0$ existence; unrestricted four-agent, ten-good all-good EFX$_0$ remains unresolved.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Residual Maximin Share: Exact Finite-Agent Frontier, Sparse Extremizers, and Threshold Cuts

Residual maximin share (RMMS) is the largest share threshold that remains guaranteeable throughout dynamic allocation processes, even after previously allocated, lower-valued bundles are removed from the item pool. For additive valuations, recent density-balance analyses established finite-agent lower bounds comparing RMMS with the classical maximin share (MMS). In this paper, we prove that these finite-agent lower bounds are exact. Specifically, if $d_n$ denotes the largest odd integer at most $n$, the worst-case ratio satisfies $\inf_{M,v:\operatorname{MMS}>0}\frac{\operatorname{RMMS}(M,v,n)}{\operatorname{MMS}(M,v,n)}=\frac{2d_n}{3d_n-1}$. Consequently, the exact additive frontier forms consecutive odd-even plateaus and converges monotonically to $2/3$. We then investigate the combinatorial structure of extremal instances. While naive witnesses require $Θ(n^2)$ items, we construct an explicit three-valued family achieving the exact boundary with only linear support: $(5n-3)/2$ items for odd $n$ and $(5n-4)/2$ items for even $n$. Its low-valued block supports two exact partitions that simultaneously certify the MMS benchmark and the residual obstruction. By modeling these dual partitions as a bipartite transportation graph, we prove that this block attains the absolute minimum support $q+d-1=3q$. At minimum support, any two-valued filler is uniquely rigid up to relabeling. Finally, we establish structural characterizations of RMMS. A general min--max representation applies to all finite monotone valuations. For integer additive valuations, we prove that a threshold $T$ is residual self-feasible if and only if every subset cut satisfies a packing-covering condition. Because RMMS is pointwise maximal among residual self-feasible shares, these exact constants establish a tight limitation on the fairness guarantees achievable by share-based lone-divider algorithms.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

The Exact MMS Guarantees of EFX and PMMS

Envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) and pairwise maximin share (PMMS) are standard local fairness criteria for indivisible goods, whereas maximin share (MMS) is a global benchmark. We determine the exact quantitative relationship between these local fairness notions and the global MMS guarantee under nonnegative additive valuations. We show that the optimal universal factor for both notions is $ρ^{\mathrm{EFX}\to\mathrm{MMS}}=ρ^{\mathrm{PMMS}\to\mathrm{MMS}}=\frac{10}{17}$. We prove the lower bound by a combinatorial charging argument. After an initial reduction, both EFX and PMMS imply the same local condition on every foreign bundle from the perspective of a focal agent: deleting its least valuable good leaves value at most the focal bundle. A three-piece concave weight function translates this local condition into the global $10/17$ guarantee. We then construct an explicit family of complete allocations that are simultaneously PMMS and EFX$_0$, whose MMS ratios converge to $10/17$, showing that both constants are tight even in the presence of zero-valued goods. The argument also gives $α$-EFX $\Rightarrow (10α/17)$-MMS. Finally, we establish an exact correspondence between these fair-division guarantees and scheduling equilibria. For every fixed number of agents $n$, the EFX-to-MMS extremal ratio equals the reciprocal of the pure price of anarchy for selfish identical-machine covering. Similarly, the PMMS-to-MMS ratio equals the reciprocal of a locality gap based on exact pairwise machine repartition. These correspondences explain why the constant $10/17$ governs both problems.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Mechanism Design for Facility Location Games Under a Prelocated Facility

We study the problem of locating a new homogeneous facility under a prelocated facility. Here, a set of $n$ agents is located on a real line or a circle, each of whom has her location as private information, and her cost is the (expected) distance from her location to the nearest facility. Our goal is to design mechanisms which can approximately minimize the maximum cost or the social cost while eliciting agents' private information truthfully (i.e., strategy-proof). Based on real-life scenarios, we consider the problem in two settings: the general setting where each agent can be located at both sides of the prelocated facility, and the special setting where all the agents are located at the same side of the prelocated facility. For agents on a line, in the general setting, we design the best possible deterministic strategy-proof mechanism with $2$-approximation and provide a lower bound of $1.5-ε\textbf{ }(ε>0)$ for any randomized strategy-proof mechanism under the maximum cost objective. For the social cost, we obtain an upper bound of $n$ for deterministic strategy-proof mechanisms and lower bounds of $1.5$ and $1.0425$ for any deterministic strategy-proof mechanism and any randomized strategy-proof mechanism, respectively. In the special setting, we further provide a randomized strategy-proof $5/3$-approximation mechanism for the maximum cost and a deterministic strategy-proof $(n-1)$-approximation mechanism for the social cost. For agents on a circle, we provide a deterministic strategy-proof 2-approximation mechanism under the maximum cost objective.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

LangBP: Language-Guided Reasoning and Acting for Joint Bidding and Pricing

Auto-bidding is a long-horizon sequential decision problem for maximizing conversion value under budget and key performance indicator (KPI) constraints. Recent work extends this task from bidding alone to joint bidding and pricing, where a policy controls bidding decisions and pricing corrections. Existing methods mainly rely on numerical trajectory modeling, which offers limited support for interpreting campaign context and expressing high-level strategies. Large language models (LLMs) can complement this paradigm with their reasoning capabilities. However, existing language-guided methods have two limitations. First, they condition actions on language strategies without modeling the corresponding state changes, making it difficult to distinguish errors in strategy understanding from errors in action generation. Second, different instructions can produce similar execution effects, leading to imbalanced policy updates across effects. We propose LangBP, a hierarchical framework for language-guided joint bidding and pricing. LangBP's Semantic Decision Transformer (S-DT) predicts target states from the instruction and the trajectory history, then recovers the joint action via inverse dynamics. We further propose Execution-Grouped Policy Optimization (EGPO), which scores candidate effects with a Context--Effect Verifier (CEV) and balances policy updates across effect groups. Experiments on AuctionNet show that LangBP outperforms strong baselines, and online A/B tests further demonstrate business gains in real-world deployment on a large-scale e-commerce platform.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Test-time Reinforcement Learning in Imperfect Information Games

Test-time reasoning has significantly improved performance in domains ranging from games to language models. However, test-time policy changes with formal guarantees on the performance of the resulting strategy remain a challenge in two-player zero-sum imperfect-information games. Existing solutions are limited to tabular methods or single gradient step updates. In this work, we investigate policy-gradient algorithms as a method for scalable test-time reasoning. We extend the concept of gadget game, tabular technique for test-time search, to the reinforcement learning setting. Unlike prior approaches, we represent the gadget game implicitly by modified sampling and neural policy rather then explicitly by constructing it, thereby removing constraints on subgame size. Furthermore, we formally prove that, unlike prior tabular algorithms, regularized policy-gradient algorithms limit possible strategy degradation caused by test-time reasoning, even without the gadget games. Our evaluation across small- and large-scale games confirms that additional test-time training often substantially improves performance relative to the blueprint strategy.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Reaching Fairness by Reallocating Goods

Fair allocation of indivisible goods has largely been studied under the assumption that no prior allocation exists. Motivated by practical settings with pre-existing (and possibly unfair) allocations, we study how to achieve fairness through limited reallocations. Building on recent work on reformability/reallocations, we consider three fairness notions---envy-freeness (EF), envy-freeness up to one good (EF1), and envy-freeness up to any good (EFX)---and optimize the number of goods reallocated. We analyze both the classical and parameterized complexity of these problems, providing a comprehensive analysis across multiple fairness notions.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Bidding Games with Rewards: Taming Infinite Configuration Space

Bidding games are graph games in which a token is placed on a vertex, each player starts with an initial budget, and a simultaneous auction determines which player moves the token; the players' budgets are then updated accordingly. Motivated by scenarios such as resource-allocation systems in which agents receive periodic rewards (e.g., credits, energy) while competing for control, we introduce and study bidding games with rewards, in which, at each vertex, players may receive additional budget, incentivizing desired behaviors. We focus on reachability discrete poorman bidding games with rewards (DPBGr). The main challenge when compared to discrete bidding games without rewards is that the configuration graph is infinite. To this end we introduce a novel technique to eliminate plays with suboptimal infixes. This enables focusing on a finite part of the infinite configuration graph in order to solve the game via approximation to continuous bidding games with overall complexity in EXP. Finally, we discuss a new type of strategy, usable on a subclass of DPBGr, which guarantee a winning strategy for the reachability player. Membership in this subclass is shown to be in NP.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Constrained Fair Allocations via Partition Matroid Reductions

We study fair allocation of indivisible goods under additive valuations and matroid constraints. A challenging open question is whether a complete and feasible envy-free up to one good (EF1) allocation exists under every matroid that admits a complete and feasible allocation. The state-of-the-art result by Biswas and Barman [2018] positively resolves this question for partition matroids. Our first result positively resolves it for laminar matroids, which generalize partition matroids, when there are three agents. Our technique reduces this general existence question to finding an EF1 allocation satisfying a mild additional condition under a single finite-sized key laminar matroid, and we establish the required allocation by case analysis. We show that our technique somewhat extends to four agents, reducing the analogous problem to finding EF1 allocations under two finite-sized laminar matroids, although we are unable to establish their existence. We also use recent matroid decomposition results to establish EF1 existence under broader classes of matroids. Specifically, we show that EF1 allocations always exist under transversal matroids whenever a complete allocation is feasible, and obtain existence results for graphic matroids and gammoids under stronger assumptions.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Constant Individual Regret in General Games

Uncoupled no-regret dynamics provide a decentralized route to equilibrium, but prior guarantees for individual regret retain a polylogarithmic dependence on the horizon. We remove this dependence for every finite $N$-player normal-form game under full-information feedback. We introduce \emph{ECHO-OFTRL}: optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader (OFTRL) equipped with an EMA cascade for high-order optimism (ECHO), where EMA denotes exponential moving average. The algorithm is deterministic and fully uncoupled. If $m_{\max}$ denotes the largest action-set size, then, simultaneously for every horizon $T\geq1$, it guarantees that each of the $N$ players in the game incurs regret upper bounded by $O(\textrm{poly}(N, \log m_{\max}))$. Our algorithm leverages a new form of optimism inspired by modern filter design.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Rock, Paper, Scissors, ... Dynamite - A Model of Disruption from New Technologies

We seek to understand the effect of adding disruptive highly-capable new technologies to competitions by assessing the addition of Dynamite to Rock-Paper-Scissors. We find that providing a versatile Dynamite move to only one player provides limited value (win probability increases from 50% to 55.5%) and is played rarely. That value decreases further if the game is expanded beyond just the original three moves. We also observe several mechanisms by which prior moves can become strategically unplayable, or obsolete. We hope that this model illustrates some non-intuitive aspects of developing new versatile technologies. We also hope that it illustrates some pitfalls for developers and integrators to avoid in order to create value rather than merely capability.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

Nash Core in Multiwinner Election

In the approval-based committee selection problem, a committee is said to be in the core if no subset of voters has an incentive to deviate by selecting a \emph{blocking} committee of proportional size, such that every voter in the deviating group strictly prefers the blocking committee. We consider the setting where candidates can be selected fractionally. Under a mild regularity assumption, we show that there always exists a weighting of candidates such that the fractional committee maximizing the candidate-weighted Nash Social Welfare is in the core. We refer to such a solution as being in the \emph{Nash core}. Additionally, we show that a Nash core solution admits a payment assignment between voters and candidates, where each voter pays a candidate they approve in proportion to the weight. For the discrete setting, where each candidate is either included or excluded from the committee, we prove that every approval-based committee election with at most eight equally weighted voters has a core committee by rounding the fractional Nash core solution. Although the non-emptiness of the core in this setting remains an open question and checking core membership is coNP-hard, we extend the notion of the Nash core to the discrete case, yielding a formulation that is efficiently verifiable and offers a promising path toward establishing core existence in discrete settings. Finally, we test our approach on real voting data using a payment-guided heuristic. We empirically show that the Nash core solution can be efficiently computed through an iterative algorithm in both the fractional and discrete settings.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Perturbation Sensitivity of Maximum-Likelihood Pairwise Ranking in Computational Decision Systems

Maximum-likelihood pairwise ranking is a com- mon computational mechanism for prioritization, reputation estimation, and comparison-driven decision support. Despite its broad use, the perturbation sensitivity of this estimator under structured changes in comparison data remains insufficiently characterized. We study this question as an applied-mathematics and computational-science problem in stability analysis. We for- mulate coordinated perturbation as a budgeted subset-selection problem over pairwise observations and introduce an Adaptive Subset Selection Attack (ASSA) as a scalable search heuristic for probing high-impact perturbation sets. Through experiments on synthetic and observed preference datasets, we show that MLE-based ranking can exhibit pronounced regime-dependent sensitivity: relatively small but coordinated perturbations may in- duce meaningful changes in output orderings, while the response profile varies across budgets and data conditions. By comparing ASSA with random, greedy, and randomized subset baselines under repeated trials, we characterize both the magnitude and the variability of perturbation-induced ranking shifts. These results position pairwise ranking sensitivity as a problem in computational reliability, numerical stability, and robustness auditing for engineering systems built on comparison-driven inference.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Truthful AI Advisors: A Pre-Specified Benchmark for Large Language Model Honesty Under Preference Misalignment

Large language models are increasingly deployed as advisors whose objective is not aligned with the user's: recommenders optimize for engagement, sales assistants for purchases. Whether they stay truthful when honesty conflicts with their own payoff is a core alignment question. We turn the canonical Crawford-Sobel cheap-talk model into a pre-specified benchmark for LLM honesty under preference misalignment, in which theory supplies an exact oracle. A sender observes a state omega in [0,1], wants the receiver's action near omega+b, and sends one costless message to a receiver whose ideal action is omega. For the positive-bias grid b in {0.01,0.04,0.08,0.12} the exact most-informative partition sizes are 7,4,3,2, with oracle normalized mutual information 0.5294, 0.3268, 0.2205, 0.1829. Extending a pre-registered 4-model run of 12,000 sender calls to eight models across two capability tiers and 39,569 logged calls, all models over-reveal relative to the most-informative equilibrium by 1.8 to 4.5x: pooled normalized mutual information stays at 0.82-0.96 where the oracle prescribes 0.18-0.53. Informativeness declines with bias as predicted (beta = -1.71, t = -7.50) but never approaches the strategic optimum; rather than coarse partitions, models show near-full revelation with a constant upward offset tracking their bias (linear exaggeration). A structural hint separates capability from propensity: told the equilibrium partition size, reasoning models state a correct Crawford-Sobel cell in 0.20-0.99 of messages while the non-reasoning tier never exceeds 0.005. The capability is present but goes unexercised unless asked for, locating the failure in propensity rather than competence. A decoder ablation shows the finding is recoverable only when the receiver reads the sender's stated number: an embedding-only decoder mis-reads the same data as near-babbling.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Reaching as Cheap as Possible in 1-clock Robust Weighted Timed Games

The value problem for 2-player games on graph generally consists in determining the minimal value Min can ensure against any possible strategy for Max. We consider here the value problem for reachability objectives in weighted timed games (WTGs) under a robust semantics. WTGs are a modelling formalism combining real-time constraints and integer weights on transitions and locations in an adversarial setting. Robustness allows for representing timing imprecisions in the measurement of delays and clock values. Robust weighted timed games have been introduced more than a decade ago: they are undecidable in general, and were quite recently shown decidable for the subclasses of acyclic or divergent robust WTGs. This paper pursues the goal of identifying decidable subclasses and establishes the decidability of the robust value problem for 1-clock WTGs.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Individual Rationality in Constrained Hedonic Games: Friends, Enemies, and Neutrals

We study constrained coalition formation in games induced by friends, enemies, and neutrals, under the two standard refinements of additively separable preferences: friend-oriented and enemy-oriented. We ask for partitions that are individually rational (IR), while additionally requiring exactly $k$ non-empty coalitions, each satisfying a prescribed lower and upper bound on its size. Although IR alone is trivial to satisfy for any hedonic game, the size constraints make it computationally intractable to decide whether a feasible partition exists. The two models tell strikingly different stories. Under enemy-oriented preferences, the problem collapses to size-constrained graph coloring, and its complexity follows accordingly. Under friend-oriented preferences, however, the picture is far more intricate, and is governed by the enmity structure rather than the friendships. The complexity is further shaped by two factors: how strict the imposed size requirements are, and whether relationships are symmetric or asymmetric, with several cases turning out tractable in the symmetric setting but intractable once asymmetry is allowed. Charting this boundary in terms of both classical and parameterized complexity, we provide a complete understanding of which properties of the friend/enemy structure are responsible for hardness.

cs.GT↗
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
Individualized Algorithmic Advice as a Strategic Signal on Competitive Markets2026-08-312511.09454arxiv
Learning Proportional Committees from Violation Feedback2026-08-312608.30111arxiv
Rival-Injective Allocations: Support-List Structure and Maximum-Anchor EFX$_0$ Certificates2026-08-312608.30203arxiv
Residual Maximin Share: Exact Finite-Agent Frontier, Sparse Extremizers, and Threshold Cuts2026-08-312608.30257arxiv
The Exact MMS Guarantees of EFX and PMMS2026-08-312608.30267arxiv
Mechanism Design for Facility Location Games Under a Prelocated Facility2026-08-312608.30292arxiv
LangBP: Language-Guided Reasoning and Acting for Joint Bidding and Pricing2026-08-312608.30343arxiv
Test-time Reinforcement Learning in Imperfect Information Games2026-08-312608.30635arxiv
Reaching Fairness by Reallocating Goods2026-08-312608.30669arxiv
Bidding Games with Rewards: Taming Infinite Configuration Space2026-08-312608.30862arxiv
Constrained Fair Allocations via Partition Matroid Reductions2026-08-312608.31121arxiv
Constant Individual Regret in General Games2026-08-312608.31166arxiv
Rock, Paper, Scissors, ... Dynamite - A Model of Disruption from New Technologies2026-08-312609.00207arxiv
Nash Core in Multiwinner Election2026-08-312609.00486arxiv
Perturbation Sensitivity of Maximum-Likelihood Pairwise Ranking in Computational Decision Systems2026-08-302604.17805arxiv
Truthful AI Advisors: A Pre-Specified Benchmark for Large Language Model Honesty Under Preference Misalignment2026-08-302606.01456arxiv
Reaching as Cheap as Possible in 1-clock Robust Weighted Timed Games2026-08-302606.28773arxiv
Individual Rationality in Constrained Hedonic Games: Friends, Enemies, and Neutrals2026-08-302608.14461arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.