arXiv subjects

Xiaowei Wu

Publications and source records attributed to Xiaowei Wu.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2025

Edge-weighted Matching in the Dark

We present a $0.659$-competitive Quadratic Ranking algorithm for the Oblivious Bipartite Matching problem, a distribution-free version of Query-Commit Matching. This result breaks the $1-\frac{1}{e}$ barrier, addressing an open question raised by Tang, Wu, and Zhang (JACM 2023). Moreover, the competitive ratio of this distribution-free algorithm improves the best existing $0.641$ ratio for Query-Commit Matching achieved by the distribution-dependent algorithm of Chen, Huang, Li, and Tang (SODA 2025). Quadratic Ranking is a novel variant of the classic Ranking algorithm. We parameterize the algorithm with two functions, and let two key expressions in the definition and analysis of the algorithm be quadratic forms of the two functions. We show that the quadratic forms are the unique choices that satisfy a set of natural properties. Further, they allow us to optimize the choice of the two functions using powerful quadratic programming solvers.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

When is Truthfully Allocating Chores no Harder than Goods?

We study the problem of fairly and efficiently allocating a set of items among strategic agents with additive valuations, where items are either all indivisible or all divisible. When items are goods, numerous positive and negative results are known regarding the fairness and efficiency guarantees achievable by truthful mechanisms, whereas our understanding of truthful mechanisms for chores remains considerably more limited. In this paper, we discover various connections between truthful good and chore allocations, greatly enhancing our understanding of the latter via tools from the former. For indivisible chores with two agents, by leveraging the observation that a simple bundle-swapping operation transforms several properties for goods including truthfulness to the corresponding properties for chores, we characterize truthful mechanisms and derive tight guarantees of various fairness notions achieved by truthful mechanisms. Moreover, for homogeneous divisible chores, by generalizing the above transformation to an arbitrary number of agents, we characterize truthful mechanisms with two agents, show that every truthful mechanism with two agents admits an efficiency ratio of $0$, and derive a large family of strictly truthful, envy-free (EF), and proportional mechanisms for an arbitrary number of agents. Finally, for indivisible chores with an arbitrary number of agents having bi-valued cost functions, we give an ex-ante truthful, ex-ante Pareto optimal, ex-ante EF, and ex-post envy-free up to one item mechanism, improving the best guarantees for bi-valued instances by prior works.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Half Spatially Coupled Turbo-Like Codes

This paper presents a new class of spatially coupled turbo-like codes (SC-TCs), namely half spatially coupled braided convolutional codes (HSC-BCCs) and half spatially coupled parallel concatenated codes (HSC-PCCs). Different from the conventional SC-TCs, the proposed codes have simpler and deterministic coupling structures. Most notably, the coupling of HSC-BCCs is performed by re-encoding the whole coupling sequence in the component encoder of one time instant, rather than spreading the coupling bits to component encoders of multiple time instants. This simplification not only addresses the window decoding threshold loss issue in existing BCCs, but also allows the proposed codes to attain very close-to-capacity performance with a coupling memory as small as 2. Both theoretical and numerical results are provided to demonstrate the performance advantages of the proposed codes over existing spatially coupled codes.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2025

FontGuard: A Robust Font Watermarking Approach Leveraging Deep Font Knowledge

The proliferation of AI-generated content brings significant concerns on the forensic and security issues such as source tracing, copyright protection, etc, highlighting the need for effective watermarking technologies. Font-based text watermarking has emerged as an effective solution to embed information, which could ensure copyright, traceability, and compliance of the generated text content. Existing font watermarking methods usually neglect essential font knowledge, which leads to watermarked fonts of low quality and limited embedding capacity. These methods are also vulnerable to real-world distortions, low-resolution fonts, and inaccurate character segmentation. In this paper, we introduce FontGuard, a novel font watermarking model that harnesses the capabilities of font models and language-guided contrastive learning. Unlike previous methods that focus solely on the pixel-level alteration, FontGuard modifies fonts by altering hidden style features, resulting in better font quality upon watermark embedding. We also leverage the font manifold to increase the embedding capacity of our proposed method by generating substantial font variants closely resembling the original font. Furthermore, in the decoder, we employ an image-text contrastive learning to reconstruct the embedded bits, which can achieve desirable robustness against various real-world transmission distortions. FontGuard outperforms state-of-the-art methods by +5.4%, +7.4%, and +5.8% in decoding accuracy under synthetic, cross-media, and online social network distortions, respectively, while improving the visual quality by 52.7% in terms of LPIPS. Moreover, FontGuard uniquely allows the generation of watermarked fonts for unseen fonts without re-training the network. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/KAHIMWONG/FontGuard.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Approximately EFX and PO Allocations for Bivalued Chores

We consider the computation for allocations of indivisible chores that are approximately EFX and Pareto optimal (PO). Recently, Garg et al. (2024) show the existence of $3$-EFX and PO allocations for bi-valued instances, where the cost of an item to an agent is either $1$ or $k$ (where $k > 1$) by rounding the (fractional) earning restricted equilibrium. In this work, we improve the approximation ratio to $(2-1/k)$, while preserving the Pareto optimality. Instead of rounding fractional equilibrium, our algorithm starts with the integral EF1 equilibrium for bi-valued chores, introduced by Garg et al. (AAAI 2022) and Wu et al. (EC 2023), and reallocates items until approximate EFX is achieved. We further improve our result for the case when $k=2$ and devise an algorithm that computes EFX and PO allocations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Guaranteeing MMS for All but One Agent When Allocating Indivisible Chores

We study the problem of allocating $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with additive cost functions under the fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). In this work, we propose a notion called $α$-approximate all-but-one maximin share ($α$-AMMS) which is a stronger version of $α$-approximate MMS. An allocation is called $α$-AMMS if $n-1$ agents are guaranteed their MMS values and the remaining agent is guaranteed $α$-approximation of her MMS value. We show that there exist $α$-AMMS allocations, with $α= 9/8$ for three agents; $α= 4/3$ for four agents; and $α= (n+1)^2/4n$ for $n\geq 5$ agents.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Weighted Envy-Freeness in House Allocation

The classic house allocation problem involves assigning $m$ houses to $n$ agents based on their utility functions, ensuring each agent receives exactly one house. A key criterion in these problems is satisfying fairness constraints such as envy-freeness. We extend this problem by considering agents with arbitrary weights, focusing on the concept of weighted envy-freeness, which has been extensively studied in fair division. We present a polynomial-time algorithm to determine whether weighted envy-free allocations exist and, if so, to compute one. Since weighted envy-free allocations do not always exist, we also investigate the potential of achieving such allocations through the use of subsidies. We provide several characterizations for weighted envy-freeable allocations (allocations that can be turned weighted envy-free by introducing subsidies) and show that they do not always exist, which is different from the unweighted setting. Furthermore, we explore the existence of weighted envy-freeable allocations in specific scenarios and outline the conditions under which they exist.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Tree Splitting Based Rounding Scheme for Weighted Proportional Allocations with Subsidy

We consider the problem of allocating $m$ indivisible items to a set of $n$ heterogeneous agents, aiming at computing a proportional allocation by introducing subsidy (money). It has been shown by Wu et al. (WINE 2023) that when agents are unweighted a total subsidy of $n/4$ suffices (assuming that each item has value/cost at most $1$ to every agent) to ensure proportionality. When agents have general weights, they proposed an algorithm that guarantees a weighted proportional allocation requiring a total subsidy of $(n-1)/2$, by rounding the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. In this work, we revisit the problem and the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. We show that by formulating the fractional allocation returned by the algorithm as a directed tree connecting the agents and splitting the tree into canonical components, there is a rounding scheme that requires a total subsidy of at most $n/3 - 1/6$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Improved Competitive Ratios for Online Bipartite Matching on Degree Bounded Graphs

We consider the online bipartite matching problem on $(k,d)$-bounded graphs, where each online vertex has at most $d$ neighbors, each offline vertex has at least $k$ neighbors, and $k\geq d\geq 2$. The model of $(k,d)$-bounded graphs is proposed by Naor and Wajc (EC 2015 and TEAC 2018) to model the online advertising applications in which offline advertisers are interested in a large number of ad slots, while each online ad slot is interesting to a small number of advertisers. They proposed deterministic and randomized algorithms with a competitive ratio of $1 - (1-1/d)^k$ for the problem, and show that the competitive ratio is optimal for deterministic algorithms. They also raised the open questions of whether strictly better competitive ratios can be achieved using randomized algorithms, for both the adversarial and stochastic arrival models. In this paper we answer both of their open problems affirmatively. For the adversarial arrival model, we propose a randomized algorithm with competitive ratio $1 - (1-1/d)^k + Ω(d^{-4}\cdot e^{-\frac{k}{d}})$ for all $k\geq d\geq 2$. We also consider the stochastic model and show that even better competitive ratios can be achieved. We show that for all $k\geq d\geq 2$, the competitive ratio is always at least $0.8237$. We further consider the $b$-matching problem when each offline vertex can be matched at most $b$ times, and provide several competitive ratio lower bounds for the adversarial and stochastic model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Improved Competitive Ratio for Edge-Weighted Online Stochastic Matching

We consider the edge-weighted online stochastic matching problem, in which an edge-weighted bipartite graph G=(I\cup J, E) with offline vertices J and online vertex types I is given. The online vertices have types sampled from I with probability proportional to the arrival rates of online vertex types. The online algorithm must make immediate and irrevocable matching decisions with the objective of maximizing the total weight of the matching. For the problem with general arrival rates, Feldman et al. (FOCS 2009) proposed the Suggested Matching algorithm and showed that it achieves a competitive ratio of 1-1/e \approx 0.632. The ratio has recently been improved to 0.645 by Yan (2022), who proposed the Multistage Suggested Matching (MSM) algorithm. In this paper, we propose the Evolving Suggested Matching (ESM) algorithm, and show that it achieves a competitive ratio of 0.650.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Approximately EFX Allocations for Indivisible Chores

In this paper, we study how to fairly allocate a set of m indivisible chores to a group of n agents, each of which has a general additive cost function on the items. Since envy-free (EF) allocations are not guaranteed to exist, we consider the notion of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX). In contrast to the fruitful results regarding the (approximation of) EFX allocations for goods, very little is known for the allocation of chores. Prior to our work, for the allocation of chores, it is known that EFX allocations always exist for two agents or general number of agents with identical ordering cost functions. For general instances, no non-trivial approximation result regarding EFX allocation is known. In this paper, we make progress in this direction by providing several polynomial time algorithms for the computation of EFX and approximately EFX allocations. We show that for three agents we can always compute a 4.45-approximation of EFX allocation. For n>=4 agents, our algorithm always computes a (3n^2-n)-approximation. We also study the bi-valued instances, in which agents have at most two cost values on the chores. For three agents, we provide an algorithm for the computation of EFX allocations. For n>=4 agents, we present algorithms for the computation of partial EFX allocations with at most n-1 unallocated items; and (n-1)-approximation of EFX allocations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

On the Existence of EFX (and Pareto-Optimal) Allocations for Binary Chores

We study the problem of allocating a group of indivisible chores among agents while each chore has a binary marginal. We focus on the fairness criteria of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) and investigate the existence of EFX allocations. We show that when agents have additive binary cost functions, there exist EFX and Pareto-optimal (PO) allocations that can be computed in polynomial time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first setting of a general number of agents that admits EFX and PO allocations, before which EFX and PO allocations have only been shown to exist for three bivalued agents. We further consider more general cost functions: cancelable and general monotone (both with binary marginal). We show that EFX allocations exist and can be computed for binary cancelable chores, but EFX is incompatible with PO. For general binary marginal functions, we propose an algorithm that computes (partial) envy-free (EF) allocations with at most $n-1$ unallocated items.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Prophet Inequality on I.I.D. Distributions: Beating 1-1/e with a Single Query

In this work, we study the single-choice prophet inequality problem, where a gambler faces a sequence of~$n$ online i.i.d. random variables drawn from an unknown distribution. When a variable reveals its value, the gambler needs to decide irrevocably whether or not to accept the value. The goal is to maximize the competitive ratio between the expected gain of the gambler and that of the maximum variable. It is shown by Correa et al. that when the distribution is unknown or only $o(n)$ uniform samples from the distribution are given, the best an algorithm can do is $1/e$-competitive. In contrast, when the distribution is known or $Ω(n)$ uniform samples are given, the optimal competitive ratio of 0.7451 can be achieved. In this paper, we study a new model in which the algorithm has access to an oracle that answers quantile queries about the distribution and investigate to what extent we can use a small number of queries to achieve good competitive ratios. We first use the answers from the queries to implement the threshold-based algorithms and show that with two thresholds our algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of $0.6786$. Motivated by the two-threshold algorithm, we design the observe-and-accept algorithm that requires only a single query. This algorithm sets a threshold in the first phase by making a query and uses the maximum realization from the first phase as the threshold for the second phase. It can be viewed as a natural combination of the single-threshold algorithm and the algorithm for the secretary problem. By properly choosing the quantile to query and the break-point between the two phases, we achieve a competitive ratio of $0.6718$, beating the benchmark of $1-1/e$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

One Quarter Each (on Average) Ensures Proportionality

We consider the problem of fair allocation of $m$ indivisible items to a group of $n$ agents with subsidy (money). Our work mainly focuses on the allocation of chores but most of our results extend to the allocation of goods as well. We consider the case when agents have (general) additive cost functions. Assuming that the maximum cost of an item to an agent can be compensated by one dollar, we show that a total of $n/4$ dollars of subsidy suffices to ensure a proportional allocation. Moreover, we show that $n/4$ is tight in the sense that there exists an instance with $n$ agents for which every proportional allocation requires a total subsidy of at least $n/4$. We also consider the weighted case and show that a total subsidy of $(n-1)/2$ suffices to ensure a weighted proportional allocation.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Fair Division of Indivisible Goods: Recent Progress and Open Questions

Allocating resources to individuals in a fair manner has been a topic of interest since ancient times, with most of the early mathematical work on the problem focusing on resources that are infinitely divisible. Over the last decade, there has been a surge of papers studying computational questions regarding the indivisible case, for which exact fairness notions such as envy-freeness and proportionality are hard to satisfy. One main theme in the recent research agenda is to investigate the extent to which their relaxations, like maximin share fairness (MMS) and envy-freeness up to any good (EFX), can be achieved. In this survey, we present a comprehensive review of the recent progress made in the related literature by highlighting different ways to relax fairness notions, common algorithm design techniques, and the most interesting questions for future research.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Multi-agent Online Scheduling: MMS Allocations for Indivisible Items

We consider the problem of fairly allocating a sequence of indivisible items that arrive online in an arbitrary order to a group of n agents with additive normalized valuation functions. We consider both the allocation of goods and chores and propose algorithms for approximating maximin share (MMS) allocations. When agents have identical valuation functions the problem coincides with the semi-online machine covering problem (when items are goods) and load balancing problem (when items are chores), for both of which optimal competitive ratios have been achieved. In this paper, we consider the case when agents have general additive valuation functions. For the allocation of goods, we show that no competitive algorithm exists even when there are only three agents and propose an optimal 0.5-competitive algorithm for the case of two agents. For the allocation of chores, we propose a (2-1/n)-competitive algorithm for n>=3 agents and a square root of 2 (approximately 1.414)-competitive algorithm for two agents. Additionally, we show that no algorithm can do better than 15/11 (approximately 1.364)-competitive for two agents.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Weighted EF1 Allocations for Indivisible Chores

We study how to fairly allocate a set of indivisible chores to a group of agents, where each agent $i$ has a non-negative weight $w_i$ that represents its obligation for undertaking the chores. We consider the fairness notion of weighted envy-freeness up to one item (WEF1) and propose an efficient picking sequence algorithm for computing WEF1 allocations. Our analysis is based on a natural and powerful continuous interpretation for the picking sequence algorithms in the weighted setting, which might be of independent interest. Using this interpretation, we establish the necessary and sufficient conditions under which picking sequence algorithms can guarantee other fairness notions in the weighted setting. We also study the existence of fair and efficient allocations and propose efficient algorithms for the computation of WEF1 and PO allocations for the bi-valued instances. Our result generalizes that of Garg et al. (AAAI 2022) and Ebadian et al. (AAMAS 2022) to the weighted setting. Our work also studies the price of fairness for WEF1, and the implications of WEF1 to other fairness notions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Multiagent MST Cover: Pleasing All Optimally via A Simple Voting Rule

Given a connected graph on whose edges we can build roads to connect the nodes, a number of agents hold possibly different perspectives on which edges should be selected by assigning different edge weights. Our task is to build a minimum number of roads so that every agent has a spanning tree in the built subgraph whose weight is the same as a minimum spanning tree in the original graph. We first show that this problem is NP-hard and does not admit better than $((1-o(1))\ln k)$-approximation polynomial-time algorithms unless P=NP, where $k$ is the number of agents. We then give a simple voting algorithm with an optimal approximation ratio. Moreover, our algorithm only needs to access the agents' rankings on the edges. Finally, we extend our results to submodular objective functions and Matroid rank constraints.

cs.GT↗