arXiv subjects

Xiaowei Wu

Publications and source records attributed to Xiaowei Wu.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Tight Subsidy Bounds for Weighted Proportional Allocation of Mixed Manna

We study the problem of fairly allocating m indivisible items among n agents with possibly unequal entitlements in the mixed manna setting, where each item may be perceived as a good or a chore by different agents. We focus on the fundamental fairness notion of proportionality. Since proportional allocations need not exist in this setting, we allow monetary subsidies to restore proportionality while minimizing the total subsidy. When each item's (dis)utility is bounded by 1, a total subsidy of at least τ(n) \approx n/4 may be necessary. For goods-only or chores-only instances, the best previously known upper bound was n/3-1/6 due to Wu and Zhou~(2024). We close this gap by proving that a total subsidy of at most τ(n) always suffices, thereby establishing the tight subsidy bound. Our results hold even in the more general setting of weighted mixed manna, resolving an open question posed by~Wu et al. (2023) and Garg et al. (2026). The allocation also satisfies weighted proportionality up to one item (WPROP1). Our proof develops a novel application of the Knaster-Kuratowski-Mazurkiewicz (KKM) fixed-point theorem, extending the KKM framework to share-based fairness notions. Finally, we design a polynomial-time algorithm to compute such allocations for any fixed number of agents.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Revisiting EFX and fPO Allocations for Binary Chores

We study fair and efficient allocations of indivisible chores under binary additive costs, with a focus on unequal entitlements and best-of-both-worlds guarantees. While binary valuations have been extensively studied for goods, their chore counterpart remains much less understood. A notable exception is due to Tao et al. (TCS 2025), who established that EFX and fPO are compatible for binary chores with equal entitlements. We revisit binary chores under unequal entitlements and establish the computation of allocations that satisfy WEFX and fPO. Our key technical contribution is a new lexicographic potential function tailored to chores: any allocation minimizing this potential ensures both WEFX and fPO. This potential further guides a polynomial-time local-search algorithm for computing allocations with such fairness and efficiency guarantees. For best-of-both-worlds guarantees, we show that unequal entitlements create a sharp obstruction: even with two agents and identical binary additive costs, no lottery can simultaneously satisfy ex-ante WEF and ex-post WEF1. In contrast, for equal entitlements, we construct in polynomial time a lottery that is ex-ante EF and fPO, while every realization is both EFX and fPO.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $α$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+ε}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $ε> 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Minimization Prophet Inequality with Bounded Costs

We study the cost-minimization prophet inequality problem, in which a decision-maker sequentially observes $n$ independent and identically distributed (IID) random variables. After each observation, the decision-maker must either accept the current realization and stop, or reject it and continue with the next variable. The goal is to minimize the selected value. Unlike the classical maximization setting, if none of the first $n-1$ values is accepted, the final realization must be selected. Esfandiari et al. (SIDMA 2017) showed that this problem does not admit constant-competitive online algorithms in general, which motivates subsequent work on restricted distribution classes, such as entire distributions (Livanos and Mehta, SODA 2024) and distributions with bounded extreme values (Livanos and Mehta, EC 2025). In this work, we focus on distributions with bounded support. For distributions supported on $[1,b]$, we characterize the competitive ratio of online algorithms as a function of both $b$ and $n$. We consider both distribution-aware and distribution-oblivious settings. In the distribution-aware case, we provide a nearly tight characterization of the optimal online algorithm, showing that its competitive ratio is at most $b^{(1-1/n)^n}$ for all $n\geq 2$. More significantly, we design a distribution-oblivious algorithm that achieves the same guarantee, with a sequence of predetermined thresholds that depend only on $b$ and $n$. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to the non-IID setting, where we show that a simple single-threshold algorithm attains an asymptotically optimal competitive ratio of $Θ(\sqrt{b})$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Online Matching in Convex Bipartite Graphs

Online resource-allocation systems, like outpatient scheduling and spectrum allocation, often assign sequentially arriving requests to an ordered pool of scarce resources, where each request accepts a contiguous interval of feasible options. We study the resulting online matching problem on convex bipartite graphs under irrevocable decisions and adversarial arrivals. We first show that convexity alone does not improve the classic worst-case guarantee of 1-1/e, achieved by Ranking. We then consider the uniform-length model, in which every online request has exactly d consecutive offline neighbors. We propose Flip, which uses one random bit to commit ex-ante to either earliest-feasible assignment or latest-feasible assignment. Although either natural deterministic policy can waste capacity and be asymptotically only 1/2-competitive, we show that their randomized mixture is 2/3-competitive. This guarantee is tight for Flip and remains valid against a semi-adaptive adversary that observes the selected policy before choosing the arrival order. We also prove that no randomized online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio strictly larger than 3/4 in the uniform-length model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

The Complexity of Minimizing Subsidies in Envy-Free House Allocation

The house allocation problem is a classical one-sided matching problem that concerns the assignment of a set of $m$ houses to $n$ agents according to their preferences, where each agent is assigned exactly one house. Among the various objectives studied in this setting, envy-freeness is one of the most widely adopted fairness criteria. As envy-free house allocations do not always exist, we address this challenge by introducing subsidies and aim to compute allocations that achieve envy-freeness with minimum total subsidy. For binary instances, we show that a total subsidy of at most $(n-1)$ suffices to guarantee envy-freeness in house allocation, and this bound is tight. Building on the known NP-hardness for general utilities, we further show that computing an allocation that minimizes the total subsidy is NP-hard, even under binary utilities. However, when there are only a bounded number of types of agents with binary utilities, the problem can be solved in polynomial time. Finally, we present a polynomial time algorithm that computes the minimum subsidy required to achieve envy-freeness for two types of agents with general utilities.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Fractional Fully Online Matching

This paper studies fractional matching on general graphs in the fully online model of Huang et al. (JACM 2020), in which all vertices arrive online and remain available for only a limited time. The algorithm must make irrevocable fractional matching decisions while the relevant vertices are simultaneously available. We extend the classic Water-Filling algorithm, also known as Balance and originally introduced by Kalyanasundaram and Pruhs (TCS 2000), to the fully online setting. Using an online primal-dual framework, we prove that the generalized Water-Filling algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of $2-\sqrt{2}\approx 0.586$ in the fully online model, and that this analysis is tight. To surpass the $2-\sqrt{2}$ barrier, we incorporate the ideas of eager matching and history-based pricing into Water-Filling. We show that the resulting algorithm achieves an improved competitive ratio of $0.599$, thereby establishing that Water-Filling is not optimal in the fully online setting. On the hardness side, we further improve the known upper bound for fractional fully online matching, reducing the previous best bound of $0.6297$ due to Eckl et al. (ORL 2021) to $0.6132$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Online Matching with KIID Edge Arrivals

In the classic online stochastic matching proposed by Feldman et al. (FOCS 2009), there is a known bipartite type-graph, where one side of the graph is given offline. Upon the arrival of each online vertex, its type is sampled independently and identically from the other side of the type-graph. This model has been extensively studied over the past decade, yielding a rich body of theoretical results. In this paper, we initiate the study of an edge arrival model for online stochastic matching. In our model, the online edges are sampled independently and identically (KIID) from a known type-graph, which need not be bipartite. We first show that the Greedy algorithm cannot achieve a competitive ratio strictly better than $0.5$ while the Suggested Matching algorithm has a competitive ratio of $1-1/e$ under the assumption of integral arrival rates, matching its performance in the one-sided vertex arrival model. We then propose a two-stage algorithm that combines Greedy and Suggested Matching, and show that its competitive ratio is strictly higher than $1-1/e$ for integral arrival rates. While our algorithm is simple, its analysis is intricate and builds upon the Natural LP, which has been proven very powerful in vertex arrival models. Our result reveals that even in the more challenging edge arrival setting for general graphs, competitive ratios better than $1-1/e$ are still possible, given the known distributions.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Fair Division by Contribution: A Shapley Value Perspective

In many resource allocation problems, agents' valuations are best interpreted not as subjective preferences, but as the value they generate from receiving resources. Such valuations capture productivity, effectiveness, or technology, and may differ significantly across agents. In these settings, classical fairness notions such as proportionality or envy-freeness fail to reflect agents' heterogeneous contributions to the collective outcome. Motivated by this perspective, we introduce \emph{Shapley Value Fairness (SVF)} for the allocation of divisible goods without monetary transfers. SVF interprets an agent's entitlement as her expected marginal contribution to optimal social welfare, and uses the Shapley value of the associated welfare maximization game as a normative fairness benchmark. We position SVF relative to existing fairness notions and show that it provides a natural bridge between fairness and efficiency in contribution-based environments. Since exact implementation of the Shapley value is generally infeasible without transfers, SVF naturally leads to the problem of finding allocations that approximate this benchmark as well as possible. We provide a systematic worst-case analysis of the achievable Shapley approximation ratio. For general concave valuations, we establish a tight $Θ(\ln n)$ bound. For capped concave valuations with bounded demands, this bound improves to $Θ(\ln D)$, where $D$ is the maximum aggregate demand for any item. For linear valuations, we further refine the bound to $Θ(\min\{k, \ln γ, \ln n\})$ in terms of the number of agent types $k$ and the value fluctuation ratio $γ$, and show that all bounds are asymptotically tight. Regarding per-instance guarantees, we show that a near-optimal approximation allocation can be computed efficiently (with high probability) via sampling for general concave valuations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Recent Advances in Spatially Coupled Codes: Overview and Outlook

The concept of spatial coupling is among the most significant breakthroughs in coding theory over the past decade. The excellent waterfall and error floor performance of spatially coupled codes has positioned them as promising coding candidates for future communication and data storage systems. This article presents an overview of recent advances in spatially coupled codes. In particular, we first review several representative examples of recently proposed spatially coupled codes and highlight their unique features that make them appealing for different applications. Next, we discuss the useful properties of spatially coupled codes and how to design good spatially coupled codes. The article concludes with some future research directions and open problems.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2026

Allocating Chores with Restricted Additive Costs: Achieving EFX, MMS, and Efficiency Simultaneously

In a web-based review platform, papers from various research fields must be assigned to a group of reviewers. Each paper has an inherent cost, which represents the effort required for reading and evaluating it (e.g., the paper's length). Reviewers can bid on papers they are interested in, and if they are assigned a paper they have bid on, no cost is incurred. Otherwise, the inherent cost $c(e)$ for paper $e$ applies. We capture this with a model of restricted additive costs: every item $e$ has a cost $c(e)$, and each agent either incurs $0$ or $c(e)$ for $e$. In this work, we study how to allocate such chores fairly and efficiently. We propose an algorithm for computing allocations that are both EFX and MMS. Furthermore, we show that our algorithm achieves a $2$-approximation of the optimal social cost, and the approximation ratio is optimal. We also show that slightly weaker fairness guarantees can be obtained if one requires the algorithm to run in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Proportional and Pareto-Optimal Allocation of Chores with Subsidy

We consider the problem of allocating $m$ indivisible chores among $n$ agents with possibly different weights, aiming for a solution that is both fair and efficient. Specifically, we focus on the classic fairness notion of proportionality and efficiency notion of Pareto-optimality. Since proportional allocations may not always exist in this setting, we allow the use of subsidies (monetary compensation to agents) to ensure agents are proportionally-satisfied, and aim to minimize the total subsidy required. Wu and Zhou (WINE 2024) showed that when each chore has disutility at most 1, a total subsidy of at most $n/3 - 1/6$ is sufficient to guarantee proportionality. However, their approach is based on a complex technique, which does not guarantee economic efficiency - a key desideratum in fair division. In this work, we give a polynomial-time algorithm that achieves the same subsidy bound while also ensuring Pareto-optimality. Moreover, both our algorithm and its analysis are significantly simpler than those of Wu and Zhou (WINE 2024). Our approach first computes a proportionally-fair competitive equilibrium, and then applies a rounding procedure guided by minimum-pain-per-buck edges.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Degree-bounded Online Bipartite Matching: OCS vs. Ranking

We revisit the online bipartite matching problem on $d$-regular graphs, for which Cohen and Wajc (SODA 2018) proposed an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $1-2\sqrt{H_d/d} = 1-O(\sqrt{(\log d)/d})$ and showed that it is asymptotically near-optimal for $d=ω(1)$. However, their ratio is meaningful only for sufficiently large $d$, e.g., the ratio is less than $1-1/e$ when $d\leq 168$. In this work, we study the problem on $(d,d)$-bounded graphs (a slightly more general class of graphs than $d$-regular) and consider two classic algorithms for online matching problems: \Ranking and Online Correlated Selection (OCS). We show that for every fixed $d\geq 2$, the competitive ratio of OCS is at least $0.835$ and always higher than that of \Ranking. When $d\to \infty$, we show that OCS is at least $0.897$-competitive while \Ranking is at most $0.816$-competitive. We also show some extensions of our results to $(k,d)$-bounded graphs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Edge-weighted Matching in the Dark

We present a $0.659$-competitive Quadratic Ranking algorithm for the Oblivious Bipartite Matching problem, a distribution-free version of Query-Commit Matching. This result breaks the $1-\frac{1}{e}$ barrier, addressing an open question raised by Tang, Wu, and Zhang (JACM 2023). Moreover, the competitive ratio of this distribution-free algorithm improves the best existing $0.641$ ratio for Query-Commit Matching achieved by the distribution-dependent algorithm of Chen, Huang, Li, and Tang (SODA 2025). Quadratic Ranking is a novel variant of the classic Ranking algorithm. We parameterize the algorithm with two functions, and let two key expressions in the definition and analysis of the algorithm be quadratic forms of the two functions. We show that the quadratic forms are the unique choices that satisfy a set of natural properties. Further, they allow us to optimize the choice of the two functions using powerful quadratic programming solvers.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

When is Truthfully Allocating Chores no Harder than Goods?

We study the problem of fairly and efficiently allocating a set of items among strategic agents with additive valuations, where items are either all indivisible or all divisible. When items are goods, numerous positive and negative results are known regarding the fairness and efficiency guarantees achievable by truthful mechanisms, whereas our understanding of truthful mechanisms for chores remains considerably more limited. In this paper, we discover various connections between truthful good and chore allocations, greatly enhancing our understanding of the latter via tools from the former. For indivisible chores with two agents, by leveraging the observation that a simple bundle-swapping operation transforms several properties for goods including truthfulness to the corresponding properties for chores, we characterize truthful mechanisms and derive tight guarantees of various fairness notions achieved by truthful mechanisms. Moreover, for homogeneous divisible chores, by generalizing the above transformation to an arbitrary number of agents, we characterize truthful mechanisms with two agents, show that every truthful mechanism with two agents admits an efficiency ratio of $0$, and derive a large family of strictly truthful, envy-free (EF), and proportional mechanisms for an arbitrary number of agents. Finally, for indivisible chores with an arbitrary number of agents having bi-valued cost functions, we give an ex-ante truthful, ex-ante Pareto optimal, ex-ante EF, and ex-post envy-free up to one item mechanism, improving the best guarantees for bi-valued instances by prior works.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Half Spatially Coupled Turbo-Like Codes

This paper presents a new class of spatially coupled turbo-like codes (SC-TCs), namely half spatially coupled braided convolutional codes (HSC-BCCs) and half spatially coupled parallel concatenated codes (HSC-PCCs). Different from the conventional SC-TCs, the proposed codes have simpler and deterministic coupling structures. Most notably, the coupling of HSC-BCCs is performed by re-encoding the whole coupling sequence in the component encoder of one time instant, rather than spreading the coupling bits to component encoders of multiple time instants. This simplification not only addresses the window decoding threshold loss issue in existing BCCs, but also allows the proposed codes to attain very close-to-capacity performance with a coupling memory as small as 2. Both theoretical and numerical results are provided to demonstrate the performance advantages of the proposed codes over existing spatially coupled codes.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2025

FontGuard: A Robust Font Watermarking Approach Leveraging Deep Font Knowledge

The proliferation of AI-generated content brings significant concerns on the forensic and security issues such as source tracing, copyright protection, etc, highlighting the need for effective watermarking technologies. Font-based text watermarking has emerged as an effective solution to embed information, which could ensure copyright, traceability, and compliance of the generated text content. Existing font watermarking methods usually neglect essential font knowledge, which leads to watermarked fonts of low quality and limited embedding capacity. These methods are also vulnerable to real-world distortions, low-resolution fonts, and inaccurate character segmentation. In this paper, we introduce FontGuard, a novel font watermarking model that harnesses the capabilities of font models and language-guided contrastive learning. Unlike previous methods that focus solely on the pixel-level alteration, FontGuard modifies fonts by altering hidden style features, resulting in better font quality upon watermark embedding. We also leverage the font manifold to increase the embedding capacity of our proposed method by generating substantial font variants closely resembling the original font. Furthermore, in the decoder, we employ an image-text contrastive learning to reconstruct the embedded bits, which can achieve desirable robustness against various real-world transmission distortions. FontGuard outperforms state-of-the-art methods by +5.4%, +7.4%, and +5.8% in decoding accuracy under synthetic, cross-media, and online social network distortions, respectively, while improving the visual quality by 52.7% in terms of LPIPS. Moreover, FontGuard uniquely allows the generation of watermarked fonts for unseen fonts without re-training the network. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/KAHIMWONG/FontGuard.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Approximately EFX and PO Allocations for Bivalued Chores

We consider the computation for allocations of indivisible chores that are approximately EFX and Pareto optimal (PO). Recently, Garg et al. (2024) show the existence of $3$-EFX and PO allocations for bi-valued instances, where the cost of an item to an agent is either $1$ or $k$ (where $k > 1$) by rounding the (fractional) earning restricted equilibrium. In this work, we improve the approximation ratio to $(2-1/k)$, while preserving the Pareto optimality. Instead of rounding fractional equilibrium, our algorithm starts with the integral EF1 equilibrium for bi-valued chores, introduced by Garg et al. (AAAI 2022) and Wu et al. (EC 2023), and reallocates items until approximate EFX is achieved. We further improve our result for the case when $k=2$ and devise an algorithm that computes EFX and PO allocations.

cs.GT↗