arXiv subjects

Tiejun Tong

Publications and source records attributed to Tiejun Tong.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ChauBoxplot and AdaptiveBoxplot: Two R packages for boxplot-based outlier detection

Tukey's boxplot is widely used for outlier detection; however, its classic fixed-fence rule tends to flag an excessive number of outliers as the sample size grows. To address this, we introduce two new R packages, ChauBoxplot and AdaptiveBoxplot, which implement more robust and statistically principled outlier detection methods. We illustrate their advantages and practical implications through comprehensive simulation studies and a real-world analysis of provincial university admission rates from China's National College Entrance Examination. Based on these findings, we provide practical guidance to help practitioners select appropriate boxplot methods, achieving a balance between interpretability and statistical reliability.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

The Bag-and-Whisker Plot: A New Bagplot for Bivariate Data

The bagplot, also known as the "bag-and-bolster plot", is a notable extension of the boxplot from univariate to bivariate data. Although widely used, its practical application is hindered by two key limitations: the fixed inflation factor for outlier detection that does not adapt to the sample size, and the unstable convex hull used to visualize its fence. In this paper, we propose a new bagplot, namely the "bag-and-whisker plot", as an improvement method to address these limitations. Our framework recasts outlier detection as a multiple testing problem, yielding a data-adaptive fence that controls statistical error rates and enhances the reliability of outlier identification. To further resolve graphical instability, we introduce a refined visualization that abandons the convex hull (the bolster) with a direct rendering of the statistical fence, complemented by granular whiskers that effectively illustrate the data's spread. Extensive simulations and real-world data analyses demonstrate that our new bagplot exhibits superior adaptivity and robustness compared to the existing standard, and thus can be highly recommended for practical use. To increase the visibility of the work, a user-friendly R package named BagWhiskerPlot has been made publicly available on CRAN.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Unifying Boxplots: A Multiple Testing Perspective

Tukey's boxplot is a foundational tool for exploratory data analysis, but its classic outlier-flagging rule does not account for the sample size, and subsequent modifications have often been presented as separate, heuristic adjustments. In this paper, we propose a unifying framework that recasts the boxplot and its variants as graphical implementations of multiple testing procedures. We demonstrate that Tukey's original method is equivalent to an unadjusted procedure, while existing sample-size-aware modifications correspond to controlling the Family-Wise Error Rate (FWER) or the Per-Family Error Rate (PFER). This perspective not only systematizes existing methods but also naturally leads to new, more adaptive constructions. We introduce a boxplot motivated by the False Discovery Rate (FDR), and show how our framework provides a flexible pipeline for integrating state-of-the-art robust estimation techniques directly into the boxplot's graphical format. By connecting a classic graphical tool to the principles of multiple testing, our work provides a principled language for comparing, critiquing, and extending outlier detection rules for modern exploratory analysis.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

When Tukey meets Chauvenet: a new boxplot criterion for outlier detection

The box-and-whisker plot, introduced by Tukey (1977), is one of the most popular graphical methods in descriptive statistics. On the other hand, however, Tukey's boxplot is free of sample size, yielding the so-called "one-size-fits-all" fences for outlier detection. Although improvements on the sample size adjusted boxplots do exist in the literature, most of them are either not easy to implement or lack justification. As another common rule for outlier detection, Chauvenet's criterion uses the sample mean and standard derivation to perform the test, but it is often sensitive to the included outliers and hence is not robust. In this paper, by combining Tukey's boxplot and Chauvenet's criterion, we introduce a new boxplot, namely the Chauvenet-type boxplot, with the fence coefficient determined by an exact control of the outside rate per observation. Our new outlier criterion not only maintains the simplicity of the boxplot from a practical perspective, but also serves as a robust Chauvenet's criterion. Simulation study and a real data analysis on the civil service pay adjustment in Hong Kong demonstrate that the Chauvenet-type boxplot performs extremely well regardless of the sample size, and can therefore be highly recommended for practical use to replace both Tukey's boxplot and Chauvenet's criterion. Lastly, to increase the visibility of the work, a user-friendly R package named `ChauBoxplot' has also been officially released on CRAN.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Geometric standardized mean difference and its application to meta-analysis

The standardized mean difference (SMD) is a widely used measure of effect size, particularly common in psychology, clinical trials, and meta-analysis involving continuous outcomes. Traditionally, under the equal variance assumption, the SMD is defined as the mean difference divided by a common standard deviation. This approach is prevalent in meta-analysis but can be overly restrictive in clinical practice. To accommodate unequal variances, the conventional method averages the two variances arithmetically, which does not allow for an unbiased estimation of the SMD. Inspired by this, we propose a geometric approach to averaging the variances, resulting in a novel measure for standardizing the mean difference with unequal variances. We further propose the Cohen-type and Hedges-type estimators for the new SMD, and derive their statistical properties including the confidence intervals. Simulation results show that the Hedges-type estimator performs optimally across various scenarios, demonstrating lower bias, lower mean squared error, and improved coverage probability. A real-world meta-analysis also illustrates that our new SMD and its estimators provide valuable insights to the existing literature and can be highly recommended for practical use.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Computation of statistical power and sample size for in vivo research models

Sample size calculation is crucial in biomedical in vivo research investigations mainly for two reasons: to design the most resource-efficient studies and to safeguard ethical issues when alive animals are subjects of testing. In this context, power analysis has been widely applied to compute the sample size by predetermining the desired statistical power and the significance level. To verify whether the assumption of a null hypothesis is true, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to test the differences between multiple experimental groups and control group(s). In this article, we focus on the a priori power analysis, for testing multiple parameters and calculating the power of experimental designs, which is suitable to compute the sample size of trial groups in repeated measures ANOVA. We first describe repeated measures ANOVA and the statistical power from a practical aspect of biomedical research. Furthermore, we apply the G*Power software to conduct the a priori power analysis using examples of repeated measures ANOVA with three groups and five time points. We aim not to use the typical technically adapted statistical language. This will enable experimentalists to confidently formulate power calculation and sample size calculation easier and more accurately.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2024

An alternative measure for quantifying the heterogeneity in meta-analysis

Quantifying the heterogeneity is an important issue in meta-analysis, and among the existing measures, the $I^2$ statistic is most commonly used. In this paper, we first illustrate with a simple example that the $I^2$ statistic is heavily dependent on the study sample sizes, mainly because it is used to quantify the heterogeneity between the observed effect sizes. To reduce the influence of sample sizes, we introduce an alternative measure that aims to directly measure the heterogeneity between the study populations involved in the meta-analysis. We further propose a new estimator, namely the $I_A^2$ statistic, to estimate the newly defined measure of heterogeneity. For practical implementation, the exact formulas of the $I_A^2$ statistic are also derived under two common scenarios with the effect size as the mean difference (MD) or the standardized mean difference (SMD). Simulations and real data analysis demonstrate that the $I_A^2$ statistic provides an asymptotically unbiased estimator for the absolute heterogeneity between the study populations, and it is also independent of the study sample sizes as expected. To conclude, our newly defined $I_A^2$ statistic can be used as a supplemental measure of heterogeneity to monitor the situations where the study effect sizes are indeed similar with little biological difference. In such scenario, the fixed-effect model can be appropriate; nevertheless, when the sample sizes are sufficiently large, the $I^2$ statistic may still increase to 1 and subsequently suggest the random-effects model for meta-analysis.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

Optimal-$k$ difference sequence in nonparametric regression

Difference-based methods have been attracting increasing attention in nonparametric regression, in particular for estimating the residual variance.To implement the estimation, one needs to choose an appropriate difference sequence, mainly between {\em the optimal difference sequence} and {\em the ordinary difference sequence}. The difference sequence selection is a fundamental problem in nonparametric regression, and it remains a controversial issue for over three decades. In this paper, we propose to tackle this challenging issue from a very unique perspective, namely by introducing a new difference sequence called {\em the optimal-$k$ difference sequence}. The new difference sequence not only provides a better balance between the bias-variance trade-off, but also dramatically enlarges the existing family of difference sequences that includes the optimal and ordinary difference sequences as two important special cases. We further demonstrate, by both theoretical and numerical studies, that the optimal-$k$ difference sequence has been pushing the boundaries of our knowledge in difference-based methods in nonparametric regression, and it always performs the best in practical situations.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

Sequence Q-Learning Algorithm for Optimal Mobility-Aware User Association

We consider a wireless network scenario applicable to metropolitan areas with developed public transport networks and high commute demands, where the mobile user equipments (UEs) move along fixed and predetermined trajectories and request to associate with millimeter-wave (mmWave) base stations (BSs). An effective and efficient algorithm, called the Sequence Q-learning Algorithm (SQA), is proposed to maximize the long-run average transmission rate of the network, which is an NP-hard problem. Furthermore, the SQA tackles the complexity issue by only allowing possible re-associations (handover of a UE from one BS to another) at a discrete set of decision epochs and has polynomial time complexity. This feature of the SQA also restricts too frequent handovers, which are considered highly undesirable in mmWave networks. Moreover, we demonstrate by extensive numerical results that the SQA can significantly outperform the benchmark algorithms proposed in existing research by taking all UEs' future trajectories and possible decisions into account at every decision epoch.

math.OC↗

arXiv2021

IQ: Intrinsic measure for quantifying the heterogeneity in meta-analysis

Quantifying the heterogeneity is an important issue in meta-analysis, and among the existing measures, the $I^2$ statistic is the most commonly used measure in the literature. In this paper, we show that the $I^2$ statistic was, in fact, defined as problematic or even completely wrong from the very beginning. To confirm this statement, we first present a motivating example to show that the $I^2$ statistic is heavily dependent on the study sample sizes, and consequently it may yield contradictory results for the amount of heterogeneity. Moreover, by drawing a connection between ANOVA and meta-analysis, the $I^2$ statistic is shown to have, mistakenly, applied the sampling errors of the estimators rather than the variances of the study populations. Inspired by this, we introduce an Intrinsic measure for Quantifying the heterogeneity in meta-analysis, and meanwhile study its statistical properties to clarify why it is superior to the existing measures. We further propose an optimal estimator, referred to as the IQ statistic, for the new measure of heterogeneity that can be readily applied in meta-analysis. Simulations and real data analysis demonstrate that the IQ statistic provides a nearly unbiased estimate of the true heterogeneity and it is also independent of the study sample sizes.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Detecting the skewness of data from the five-number summary and its application in meta-analysis

For clinical studies with continuous outcomes, when the data are potentially skewed, researchers may choose to report the whole or part of the five-number summary (the sample median, the first and third quartiles, and the minimum and maximum values) rather than the sample mean and standard deviation. In the recent literature, it is often suggested to transform the five-number summary back to the sample mean and standard deviation, which can be subsequently used in a meta-analysis. However, if a study contains skewed data, this transformation and hence the conclusions from the meta-analysis are unreliable. Therefore, we introduce a novel method for detecting the skewness of data using only the five-number summary and the sample size, and meanwhile propose a new flow chart to handle the skewed studies in a different manner. We further show by simulations that our skewness tests are able to control the type I error rates and provide good statistical power, followed by a simulated meta-analysis and a real data example that illustrate the usefulness of our new method in meta-analysis and evidence-based medicine.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Estimating the reciprocal of a binomial proportion

As a classic parameter from the binomial distribution, the binomial proportion has been well studied in the literature owing to its wide range of applications. In contrast, the reciprocal of the binomial proportion, also known as the inverse proportion, is often overlooked, even though it also plays an important role in various fields including clinical studies and random sampling. The maximum likelihood estimator of the inverse proportion suffers from the zero-event problem, and to overcome it, alternative methods have been developed in the literature. Nevertheless, there is little work addressing the optimality of the existing estimators, as well as their practical performance comparison. Inspired by this, we propose to further advance the literature by developing an optimal estimator for the inverse proportion in a family of shrinkage estimators. We further derive the explicit and approximate formulas for the optimal shrinkage parameter under different settings. Simulation studies show that the performance of our new estimator performs better than, or as well as, the existing competitors in most practical settings. Finally, to illustrate the usefulness of our new method, we also revisit a recent meta-analysis on COVID-19 data for assessing the relative risks of physical distancing on the infection of coronavirus, in which six out of seven studies encounter the zero-event problem.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

A Pairwise Hotelling Method for Testing High-Dimensional Mean Vectors

For high-dimensional small sample size data, Hotelling's T2 test is not applicable for testing mean vectors due to the singularity problem in the sample covariance matrix. To overcome the problem, there are three main approaches in the literature. Note, however, that each of the existing approaches may have serious limitations and only works well in certain situations. Inspired by this, we propose a pairwise Hotelling method for testing high-dimensional mean vectors, which, in essence, provides a good balance between the existing approaches. To effectively utilize the correlation information, we construct the new test statistics as the summation of Hotelling's test statistics for the covariate pairs with strong correlations and the squared $t$ statistics for the individual covariates that have little correlation with others. We further derive the asymptotic null distributions and power functions for the proposed Hotelling tests under some regularity conditions. Numerical results show that our new tests are able to control the type I error rates, and can achieve a higher statistical power compared to existing methods, especially when the covariates are highly correlated. Two real data examples are also analyzed and they both demonstrate the efficacy of our pairwise Hotelling tests.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary

When reporting the results of clinical studies, some researchers may choose the five-number summary (including the sample median, the first and third quartiles, and the minimum and maximum values) rather than the sample mean and standard deviation, particularly for skewed data. For these studies, when included in a meta-analysis, it is often desired to convert the five-number summary back to the sample mean and standard deviation. For this purpose, several methods have been proposed in the recent literature and they are increasingly used nowadays. In this paper, we propose to further advance the literature by developing a smoothly weighted estimator for the sample standard deviation that fully utilizes the sample size information. For ease of implementation, we also derive an approximation formula for the optimal weight, as well as a shortcut formula for the sample standard deviation. Numerical results show that our new estimator provides a more accurate estimate for normal data and also performs favorably for non-normal data. Together with the optimal sample mean estimator in Luo et al., our new methods have dramatically improved the existing methods for data transformation, and they are capable to serve as "rules of thumb" in meta-analysis for studies reported with the five-number summary. Finally for practical use, an Excel spreadsheet and an online calculator are also provided for implementing our optimal estimators.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Fixed-effects model: the most convincing model for meta-analysis with few studies

According to Davey et al. (2011) with a total of 22,453 meta-analyses from the January 2008 Issue of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the median number of studies included in each meta-analysis is only three. In other words, about a half or more of meta-analyses conducted in the literature include only two or three studies. While the common-effect model (also referred to as the fixed-effect model) may lead to misleading results when the heterogeneity among studies is large, the conclusions based on the random-effects model may also be unreliable when the number of studies is small. Alternatively, the fixed-effects model avoids the restrictive assumption in the common-effect model and the need to estimate the between-study variance in the random-effects model. We note, however, that the fixed-effects model is under appreciated and rarely used in practice until recently. In this paper, we compare all three models and demonstrate the usefulness of the fixed-effects model when the number of studies is small. In addition, we propose a new estimator for the unweighted average effect in the fixed-effects model. Simulations and real examples are also used to illustrate the benefits of the fixed-effects model and the new estimator.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2018

A new paradox in random-effects meta-analysis

Meta-analysis is an important tool for combining results from multiple studies and has been widely used in evidence-based medicine for several decades. This paper reports, for the first time, an interesting and valuable paradox in random-effects meta-analysis that is likely to occur when the number of studies is small and/or the heterogeneity is large. With the incredible paradox, we hence advocate meta-analysts to be extremely cautious when interpreting the final results from the random-effects meta-analysis. And more importantly, with the unexpected dilemma in making decisions, the new paradox has raised an open question whether the current random-effects model is reasonable and tenable for meta-analysis, or it needs to be abandoned or further improved to some extent.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2018

A statistical normalization method and differential expression analysis for RNA-seq data between different species

Background: High-throughput techniques bring novel tools but also statistical challenges to genomic research. Identifying genes with differential expression between different species is an effective way to discover evolutionarily conserved transcriptional responses. To remove systematic variation between different species for a fair comparison, the normalization procedure serves as a crucial pre-processing step that adjusts for the varying sample sequencing depths and other confounding technical effects. Results: In this paper, we propose a scale based normalization (SCBN) method by taking into account the available knowledge of conserved orthologous genes and hypothesis testing framework. Considering the different gene lengths and unmapped genes between different species, we formulate the problem from the perspective of hypothesis testing and search for the optimal scaling factor that minimizes the deviation between the empirical and nominal type I errors. Conclusions: Simulation studies show that the proposed method performs significantly better than the existing competitor in a wide range of settings. An RNA-seq dataset of different species is also analyzed and it coincides with the conclusion that the proposed method outperforms the existing method. For practical applications, we have also developed an R package named "SCBN" and the software is available at http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/SCBN.html.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2018

Varying Coefficient Panel Data Model with Interactive Fixed Effects

In this paper, we propose a varying coefficient panel data model with unobservable multiple interactive fixed effects that are correlated with the regressors. We approximate each coefficient function by B-spline, and propose a robust nonlinear iteration scheme based on the least squares method to estimate the coefficient functions of interest. We also establish the asymptotic theory of the resulting estimators under certain regularity assumptions, including the consistency, the convergence rate and the asymptotic distribution. Furthermore, we develop a least squares dummy variable method to study an important special case of the proposed model: the varying coefficient panel data model with additive fixed effects. To construct the pointwise confidence intervals for the coefficient functions, a residual-based block bootstrap method is proposed to reduce the computational burden as well as to avoid the accumulative errors. Simulation studies and a real data analysis are also carried out to assess the performance of our proposed methods.

stat.ME↗