arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.19211

An absolute measure of heterogeneity for lnOR in meta-analysis

Ke Yang·Lei Shi·Wangli Xu·Liping Zhu·Tiejun Tong
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Quantifying the heterogeneity is an important issue in meta-analysis. The conventional heterogeneity statistic, $I^2$, heavily depends on study sample sizes and tends to approach one as the sample sizes increase. To overcome this limitation, a sample size independent measure, ${\rm ICC}_{\rm MA}$, has recently been developed to quantify the heterogeneity, yet this method is restricted to meta-analysis with continuous outcomes. In practice, however, binary outcomes are more widely encountered, with the log odds ratio (lnOR) frequently adopted as an effect size to compare the effects of two treatments in terms of odds. To fill the gap, we propose a new heterogeneity measure for meta-analysis with binary outcomes by introducing a latent continuous variable model. Under this framework, the proposed measure admits a closed-form expression within the random-effects meta-analysis model with lnOR as the effect size. We define this sample size independent measure as ${\rm ICC}_{\rm MA}^{\rm OR}$, and moreover propose a new estimator, $I^2_A$, to evaluate this measure. Simulation studies demonstrate that our new estimator is nearly unbiased and aligns closely with its counterpart applied for standardized mean differences when the continuous variable is observable. A real data application further demonstrates that the proposed heterogeneity statistic for binary outcomes and its counterpart for continuous outcomes provide interpretable and coherent estimates across different outcome types.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ke Yang, Lei Shi, Wangli Xu, Liping Zhu, Tiejun Tong. 2026-09-16. An absolute measure of heterogeneity for lnOR in meta-analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19211

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗