Larry F. Leon | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Interpretable subgroup identification across survival and generalized-linear outcomes

A subgroup analysis searching a trial's covariates or many prespecified subgroups often singles out a subgroup for its extremity, interpreted as if prespecified. Selection inflates the estimate; for a given selection rule, a correction removes the inflation. Two questions belong to the rule: which candidate to return, and whether to declare none. A third is whether inference extends to the patients left outside. We treat all three for interpretable subgroups, defined by conjunctions of covariate cuts, generated by forest search, a causal forest or a cross-fit surface estimator under one set of rules, each a modelling choice trading size against effect. Forest search screens candidates on splitting consistency, the rate at which effects replicate across half-splits; the screen is complementary-pairs stability selection in closed form, and the law of the maximum over the family gives the family-wise false-declaration rate when every candidate's effect is at least a clinically specified benefit. Refit-free multiplier resampling gives adjusted one-sided bounds (subgroup and complement), joined in a two-subgroup claim, with coverage asymptotically exact under separated selection, characterized under local competition, and conditional on a family proposed from the outcomes. Two trial applications, and simulations built from them, cover survival, binary and continuous endpoints.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Inference for Standard Trial Estimands after Data-Driven Subgroup Discovery

Data-driven subgroup identification is increasingly used in clinical trials, yet the effect reported for a discovered subgroup is typically the standard analysis: a Cox or generalized-linear-model treatment coefficient fitted within that subgroup. Selection by an effect-driven rule --- rewarding large estimated effects subject to screening and size criteria --- inflates the reported coefficient: a winner's curse invalidating naive intervals whether or not the identifier's internal estimand was de-biased by cross-fitting. We develop a procedure-agnostic framework for post-selection inference that separates discovery from reporting: forest search, difference-in-natural-parameters estimators, and causal forests generate interpretable candidate subgroups; selection is aligned with the coefficient to be reported; and the target is the standard-analysis effect of the selected subgroup, the candidate family held fixed --- a conditional, data-adaptive estimand. Resampling the search then reduces to jointly perturbing all candidate effects, yielding refit-free multiplier resampling with an infinitesimal-jackknife interval whose coverage we characterize under standard regularity and an explicit condition on the limiting competition. It matches the full bootstrap on a fixed family; on model-generated families it remains valid for the same conditional target, which the bootstrap reproduces only under further conditions. Two trial applications and matched simulations show mitigated selection bias and improved coverage.

stat.ME↗