Inference for Standard Trial Estimands after Data-Driven Subgroup Discovery

Larry F. Leon; Keaven M. Anderson

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.38361

Inference for Standard Trial Estimands after Data-Driven Subgroup Discovery

Larry F. Leon·Keaven M. Anderson

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Data-driven subgroup identification is increasingly used in clinical trials, yet the effect reported for a discovered subgroup is typically the standard analysis: a Cox or generalized-linear-model treatment coefficient fitted within that subgroup. Selection by an effect-driven rule --- rewarding large estimated effects subject to screening and size criteria --- inflates the reported coefficient: a winner's curse invalidating naive intervals whether or not the identifier's internal estimand was de-biased by cross-fitting. We develop a procedure-agnostic framework for post-selection inference that separates discovery from reporting: forest search, difference-in-natural-parameters estimators, and causal forests generate interpretable candidate subgroups; selection is aligned with the coefficient to be reported; and the target is the standard-analysis effect of the selected subgroup, the candidate family held fixed --- a conditional, data-adaptive estimand. Resampling the search then reduces to jointly perturbing all candidate effects, yielding refit-free multiplier resampling with an infinitesimal-jackknife interval whose coverage we characterize under standard regularity and an explicit condition on the limiting competition. It matches the full bootstrap on a fixed family; on model-generated families it remains valid for the same conditional target, which the bootstrap reproduces only under further conditions. Two trial applications and matched simulations show mitigated selection bias and improved coverage.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Larry F. Leon, Keaven M. Anderson. 2026-09-29. Inference for Standard Trial Estimands after Data-Driven Subgroup Discovery. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38361

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A robust multivariate, non-parametric outlier identification method for scrubbing in fMRI

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data contain high levels of noise and artifacts. To avoid contamination of downstream analyses, fMRI-based studies must identify and remove these noise sources prior to statistical analysis. One common approach is the "scrubbing" of fMRI volumes that are thought to contain high levels of noise. However, existing scrubbing techniques are based on ad hoc measures of signal change. We consider scrubbing via outlier detection, where volumes containing artifacts are considered multidimensional outliers. Robust multivariate outlier detection methods are proposed using robust distances (RDs), which are related to the Mahalanobis distance. These RDs have a known distribution when the data are i.i.d. normal, and that distribution can be used to determine a threshold for outliers where fMRI data violate these assumptions. Here, we develop a robust multivariate outlier detection method that is applicable to non-normal data. The objective is to obtain threshold values to flag outlying volumes based on their RDs. We propose two threshold candidates that embark on the same two steps, but the choice of which depends on a researcher's purpose. Our main steps are dimension reduction and selection, robust univariate outlier imputation to get rid of the effect of outliers on the distribution, and estimating an outlier threshold based on the upper quantile of the RD distribution without outliers. The first threshold candidate is an upper quantile of the empirical distribution of RDs obtained from the imputed data. The second threshold candidate calculates the upper quantile of the RD distribution that a nonparametric bootstrap uses to account for uncertainty in the empirical quantile. We compare our proposed fMRI scrubbing method to motion scrubbing, data-driven scrubbing, and restrictive parametric multivariate outlier detection methods.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Optimized Conformal Selection: Powerful Selective Inference After Data-Dependent Score Construction

We study data-driven score construction in conformal selection, which uses conformal p-values and multiple testing to select "interesting" instances with large unobserved labels from a pool of unlabeled data, while controlling the FDR in finite sample. While existing solutions require the score function to be constructed independent of the calibration and test data, it is desirable to select or construct powerful conformity score in a data-driven manner and to leverage all labeled data for score training when presented with many score choices and limited labeled data. We propose Optimized Conformal Selection (OptCS), a general framework that allows valid multiple testing after flexible data-driven score construction. We introduce general conditions under which OptCS constructs valid conformal p-values despite substantial data reuse and handles complex p-value dependencies to maintain finite-sample FDR control. We instantiate this general recipe to propose three FDR-controlling procedures, each optimizing the models differently: (i) selecting a powerful score function among multiple candidates, (ii) training the score with all labeled data without sample splitting, and (iii) combining full-sample training and model selection. We demonstrate the efficacy of our methods via simulation studies and real applications in drug discovery and large language models.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Network Cross-Validation and Model Selection via Subsampling

Complex and larger networks are becoming increasingly prevalent in scientific applications in various domains. Although a number of models and methods exist for such networks, cross-validation on networks remains challenging due to the unique structure of network data. In this paper, we propose a general cross-validation procedure called NETCROP (NETwork CRoss-Validation using Overlapping Partitions). The key idea is to divide the original network into multiple subnetworks with a shared overlap part, producing training sets consisting of the subnetworks and a test set with the node pairs between the subnetworks. This train-test split provides the basis for a network cross-validation procedure that can be applied on a wide range of model selection and parameter tuning problems for networks. The method is computationally efficient for large networks as it uses smaller subnetworks for the training step. We provide methodological details and theoretical guarantees for several model selection and parameter tuning tasks using NETCROP. Numerical results demonstrate that NETCROP performs accurate cross-validation on a diverse set of network model selection and parameter tuning problems. The results also indicate that NETCROP is computationally much faster while being often more accurate than the existing methods for network cross-validation.

stat.ME↗