arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Ioannis Anagnostides

Publications and source records attributed to Ioannis Anagnostides.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

On the Role of Geometry in Solving Variational Inequalities

The geometry of constraints in variational inequalities (VIs) plays a central role in applications ranging from resource allocation and equilibrium computation to constrained optimization. Yet, its effect on computational complexity has received surprisingly little attention beyond special cases. We examine this question when the constraint set is an $\ell_p$ ball. This family of problems encompasses two of the most extensively studied classes of problems in algorithmic game theory: symmetric bimatrix games for $p = 1$ and multi-player polymatrix games for $p = \infty$. Both of these problems are known to be PPAD-complete even for affine operators. We establish a comprehensive complexity landscape for VIs over $\ell_p$ balls across the full range $p\in[1,\infty]$. First, for any $p\neq 2$, we show that finding an inverse-polynomial approximate VI solution is PPAD-complete even for affine operators. In contrast, for $p=2$, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for affine VIs, extending a classic result of Ye (1992) beyond symmetric operators. On the other hand, once the operator becomes quadratic, we establish PPAD-completeness even at inverse polynomial precision. From a technical standpoint, we develop a new toolkit for exploiting the geometry of the constraint set and the structure of the operator to characterize the complexity of equilibrium and optimization problems, which is of independent interest.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

On the Convergence of Alternating Regret Matching Algorithms

Alternating updates, that is, where each player is updated in turn, tend to typically perform better in regret matching algorithms than simultaneous updates. Alternation within the regret matching family has long been a central ingredient of practical solvers for zero-sum games. Yet our theoretical understanding is lagging behind. In this paper, we address this gap by developing a systematic way of analyzing such algorithms. Our framework centers on an alternating analog of the RVU property that we introduce, which we use to obtain the optimal $T^{-1}$ average-iterate convergence within this family. In particular, we establish this for two simple variants of predictive regret matching$^+$: i) increasing-regret predictive regret matching$^+$ and ii) half-prediction regret matching$^+$. Interestingly, we find that half prediction is the unique prediction multiplier that satisfies our alternating RVU property, giving it a strong theoretical justification. Going beyond average-iterate convergence, we refine our framework to obtain $T^{-1/2}$ best-iterate convergence and further establish convergence of their strategy profiles to a single Nash equilibrium, without assuming equilibrium uniqueness. We go on to establish separations between alternating and simultaneous updates, including a game in which half-prediction regret matching$^+$ converges under alternating updates but fails to converge in terms of the last iterate under simultaneous updates. This provides theoretical support for the empirical observation that alternation can stabilize learning dynamics. Finally, experiments on 15 game benchmarks demonstrate that the strong theoretical properties of the half-prediction mechanism translate to strong practical performance, being on par with state-of-the-art solvers.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Follow the Regularized Leader Does Not Converge in Constrained Optimization

Follow the regularized leader (FTRL) is a foundational algorithm in online learning whose regret properties have been extensively studied for decades. However, in stark contrast to mirror descent---and gradient descent in particular---the convergence of FTRL to first-order stationary points in constrained nonconvex optimization was not well understood. In this paper, we show that continuous-time FTRL can fail to converge even asymptotically in infinitely smooth constrained optimization problems: its Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) gap can remain bounded away from zero indefinitely. This is especially surprising in light of the fact that continuous-time FTRL guarantees a monotonic improvement of the objective value. As a result, we establish that non-convergent behavior of no-regret dynamics---which besets general variational inequality problems---can occur even in potential systems. From a technical standpoint, our construction relies on an infinitely differentiable function where the gradient flow dynamics exhibit decelerating oscillations without ever converging pointwise, which we in turn embed into higher-dimensional FTRL dynamics that sustain a perpetually large KKT gap. We complement our negative result by showing that FTRL with Euclidean regularization does converge when the objective function is analytic. This shows that the analytic property plays a more fundamental role for FTRL than for gradient flow: it governs not only pointwise convergence, but convergence to first-order stationarity itself.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Fixed Sets and the Hardness of Computing Correlated Equilibria

We show that computing an approximate correlated equilibrium of a polytope game is PPAD-complete, and thus polynomial-time equivalent to finding a Nash equilibrium. This challenges the conventional view in game theory that correlated equilibria are more tractable objects than Nash equilibria. From a conceptual standpoint, we connect correlated equilibria to a natural generalization of fixed points, which we call fixed sets. A fixed set of a continuous function $f$ is a nonempty finite set $S$ such that $S \subseteq \operatorname{conv} f(S)$. Our main technical contribution is to prove that computing a fixed set is PPAD-hard even at inverse polynomial precision.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Fundamental Impossibility Results in AI Safety: Trading Off between Desiderata

Is there a fundamental tradeoff between desiderata for safe AI systems, such as harmlessness and helpfulness? We answer by formalizing the interaction between AI systems and users as a game with three players: a defender and an attacker that are computationally or informationally bounded, and an AI that provides public advice and is less constrained. Our main result shows that there is a fundamental tradeoff in providing advice that helps the defender while advice remains public. We also consider whether the information that the AI shares can be manipulated to benefit only the defender and conclude with a discussion of how we can use these results in designing safer AI systems.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

What You Earn from What You Learn: Characterization and Complexity of the Value of Information

We examine the value of information in extensive-form decision problems: the largest multiplicative gain that a decision maker can obtain from an information refinement, taken over all payoff environments. This measures the structural importance of information disentangled from any particular payoff specification, and generalizes the notion of value of recall recently introduced by Berker et al. (AAAI'25). We establish a unifying characterization of the value of information under any information refinement, uncovering an intriguing connection to the maximum fractional chromatic number over a certain family of conflict graphs. We then employ our characterization to elucidate the complexity of two central information refinements. First, for the value of perfect information in perfect-recall decision problems, we find that the relevant conflict graphs are cographs, so the fractional chromatic number collapses to the clique number. Even though the clique number is tractable for a given cograph, we show that the additional layer of optimization (over the family of graphs) makes computing the value of perfect information NP-complete. On the positive side, we prove fixed-parameter tractability in terms of the degree of imperfect information. Second, for the value of recall in imperfect-recall decision problems (with no absentmindedness), we first show that the value of recall can realize the fractional chromatic number of any graph. Interestingly, this implies that, unlike the value of perfect information, the value of recall can take fractional values. Building on this reduction, we then establish S2P-completeness. This addresses questions left open by Berker et al. (AAAI'25)---both on the characterization and the complexity of the value of recall---and shows that computing the value of recall is strictly harder than the value of perfect information.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Efficient Learning of Survival Analysis Models Under Outcome-Dependent Truncation and Censoring

Modern machine learning models are typically trained on data assumed to be representative of the predictive tasks the model will face in the future, but practical datasets violate this assumption. We focus on outcome-dependent truncation in which an observation appears in the training data depending on its label. Our work connects two largely distinct literatures: efficient learning under truncation and survival analysis. Existing methods for truncated survival analysis do not characterize the optimization landscape and instead rely on iterative procedures such as expectation maximization. We address this gap and prove that Cox regression can be efficiently learned under truncated and right-censored data using first-order optimization when the baseline hazard is known (despite nonconvexity). In contrast, when the baseline hazard is learned jointly, we construct identifiable and correctly specified models whose negative log-likelihood contains strict suboptimal local minima. On experiments with four survival datasets, we show that accounting for truncation reduces the prediction bias induced by naive Cox regression and extends to neural networks. We also show orders of magnitude speedups compared to standard expectation maximization.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Preference Elicitation for Policy Optimization and Application to Aligning Heart Transplantation with Human Values

Preference elicitation is essential for aligning AI systems with human values. Prior approaches (e.g., for organ allocation) often ask stakeholders to compare the decisions of an algorithm (e.g., patient A vs. patient B). Such a decision-level approach conflates the means with the ends. Instead, we elicit preferences directly over allocation outcomes to learn a utility function for policy optimization. We construct a novel preference elicitation algorithm for linear utilities that outperforms prior techniques in practice. Our algorithm has two phases. The first phase learns cutting planes through pairwise comparisons to rapidly shrink the space of possible attribute weights and warm-starts the second phase by eliminating dominated regions. The second phase then provably converges to the user's utility function. We apply our technique to heart transplant allocation, where a policy must balance competing objectives such as post-transplant outcomes, waitlist mortality, geographic ease, and equity. Using our algorithm, we conduct a user study to learn and aggregate a human-value-aligned utility function. We evaluate the linear representation against LLM-based methods supplied with users' natural language explanations, finding that none of these methods is more accurate than the learned linear utilities. We use the resulting utility function to optimize heart transplant policies that are significantly better aligned with human values. Compared to the hindsight optimum, the status quo policy achieves a competitive ratio of just 0.66, while our method is near-optimal with a competitive ratio of 0.95.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

A Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Variational Inequalities under the Minty Condition

Solving (Stampacchia) variational inequalities (SVIs) is a foundational problem at the heart of optimization. However, this expressivity comes at the cost of computational hardness. As a result, most research has focused on carving out specific subclasses that elude those intractability barriers. A classical property that goes back to the 1960s is the Minty condition, which postulates that the Minty VI (MVI) problem admits a solution. In this paper, we establish the first polynomial-time algorithm -- with complexity growing polynomially in the dimension $d$ and $\log(1/ε)$ -- for solving $ε$-SVIs for Lipschitz continuous mappings under the Minty condition. Prior approaches either incurred an exponentially worse dependence on $1/ε$ (and other natural parameters of the problem) or made more restrictive assumptions, such as monotonicity. To do so, we introduce a new variant of the ellipsoid algorithm whereby separating hyperplanes are obtained after taking a descent step from the center of the ellipsoid. It succeeds even though the set of SVIs can be nonconvex and not fully dimensional. Moreover, when our algorithm is applied to an instance with no MVI solution and fails to identify an SVI solution, it produces a succinct certificate of MVI infeasibility. We also show that deciding whether the Minty condition holds is $\mathsf{coNP}$-complete, thereby establishing that the disjunction of those two problems is polynomial-time solvable even though each problem is individually intractable. We provide several extensions and new applications of our main results. Most notably, we obtain the first polynomial-time algorithms for computing Nash equilibria in multi-player harmonic games. Finally, in two-player general-sum concave games, we give the first polynomial-time algorithm that outputs either a Nash equilibrium or a strict coarse correlated equilibrium.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

Normal-Form Correlation in Markov Games

There has been a surge of recent work on correlated equilibrium concepts in Markov games. However, existing results focus on concepts weaker than normal-form correlated equilibria (NFCEs), leaving open the more challenging question of computing such equilibria, which goes back to the seminal work of Papadimitriou and Roughgarden (JACM'08). Here, we establish the first efficient algorithm for NFCEs in finite-horizon Markov games with a fixed number of players $n$. In particular, with $S$ states, horizon $H$, and at most $A$ actions per player, it computes an $ε$-NFCE in time $S(AH/ε)^{O(n)}$. This is the first algorithm polynomial in $1/ε$ and the description of the game for NFCEs in an interesting class of problems beyond the normal-form setting. Moreover, under the usual assumption that recommendations are independent across states, we show PPAD-completeness---that is, computational equivalence to Nash equilibria---either in many-player games or when the precision is exponentially small. The key idea behind our approach is to run backward induction on a sequence of auxiliary stage games, but with the twist that in each step we compute a constant-expectation correlated equilibrium. This is a natural refinement of correlated equilibrium in which the conditional expected payoff from obeying is independent of the recommendation. In fact, our reduction goes both ways, establishing an equivalence between constant-expectation CEs and NFCEs in Markov games. For a fixed number of players, we observe that a constant-expectation CE can be computed approximately by combining linear programming with suitable discretization. In contrast, it is PPAD-hard in i) polymatrix (many-player) games at constant precision, and ii) two-player games at exponentially small precision. The latter result follows from an unexpected connection to rank-2 two-player games.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Algorithmic Collusion and the Complexity of Information-Value-Free Equilibria

A (coarse) correlated equilibrium (CE) is information-value-free (IVF) if a player can match the payoff obtained from recommendations by committing to a fixed action. Motivated by the problem of regulating algorithmic collusion, this refinement was introduced by Hartline, Wang, and Zhang [EC'26], who showed that it can be computed in polynomial time in explicitly represented normal-form game. In this paper, we examine the complexity of IVF(C)CEs in succinct games, which model more realistic strategic interactions that feature either many players or exponentially many pure strategies. We first show that computing an information-value-free CE is PPAD-complete in many-player polymatrix games or two-player Bayesian games, even when the approximation is a constant. We also prove an unconditional exponential query lower bound. Our results establish that IVFCEs are intractable, even in the centralized model, and rule out the existence of any efficient learning dynamics. This significantly strengthens the impossibility result of Hartline, Wang, and Zhang, which concerns a particular class of learning algorithms, and furnishes strong computational critiques of recent regulation on algorithmic collusion. To sidestep these hardness results, we examine the complexity of information-value-free CCE. Certain no-regret algorithms---such as regret matching or FTRL---provide a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for this problem. The complexity when the approximation is exponentially small turns out to be nuanced. On the one hand, leveraging no-regret dynamics, we establish membership in $\text{CLS} = \text{PPAD} \cap \text{PLS}$. On the other hand, we show that it is at least as hard as the P-matrix linear complementarity problem, and hence as hard as simple stochastic games. This shows that even IVFCCEs are unlikely to admit a polynomial-time algorithm barring a major breakthrough.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

From Compensation Design to Budget-Feasible Mechanisms: A Constant Approximation for Subadditive Valuations

Budget-feasible mechanism design is a classic framework introduced by Singer, but there is still a wide gap between existing upper and lower bounds. In this paper, we significantly advance the state of the art. First, without computational constraints, we show that there exists a universally truthful budget-feasible mechanism with the following approximation ratios: - $3$ for monotone submodular valuations and $e+1$ for nonmonotone submodular valuations, improving over $3.798$ and $9.742$, respectively. - $e+1$ for XOS valuations, improving over $28$. In large markets, our approximation can be improved deterministically to $e$. - $2e+1$ for subadditive valuations, improving over $33$. In large markets, our approximation can be improved deterministically to $2e$. Moreover, for subadditive valuations, we obtain a constant-approximation mechanism that runs in polynomial time using demand queries. This improves over the previous best approximation of $O(\log \log n)$, resolving a long-standing open problem going back to Dobzinski, Papadimitriou, and Singer, who conjectured that a constant approximation requires exponentially many demand queries. We obtain these results through a simple and unifying framework based on non-truthful indirect mechanisms, recently coined compensation design. In particular, through a potential argument, we establish constant price-of-stability bounds for compensation design based on marginal-contribution payment rules, which we then translate into truthful direct mechanisms. For subadditive valuations, the core of the argument is a new smoothing lemma showing that every subadditive function can be approximated within a factor of $2$ by a self-bounding function. This is also of independent interest, readily addressing an open question in multiwinner elections by showing the existence of a $2e$-approximate core even under subadditive valuations.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Compensation Design

We introduce compensation design, the problem of designing payment rules that incentivize high-quality contributions in decentralized environments. Here, a budget-constrained principal with a monotone submodular value function aims to design a payment rule, while agents decide whether to opt in or out depending on their private cost. We show that a simple cost-oblivious and anonymous marginal-contribution payment rule guarantees that pure Nash equilibria always exist and attain a price of anarchy (PoA) of at most $2+o_λ(1)$ in the large-market regime ($λ\to 0$) where each individual cost is at most a $λ$ fraction of the budget. We further show that the factor $2$ is unavoidable among deterministic cost-oblivious rules. Surprisingly, we identify a counterexample showing that a payment rule based on the Shapley value may admit no pure Nash equilibria. We then extend our scope to coarse correlated equilibria. This is further motivated by our intractability result: although a pure Nash equilibrium always exists, computing one is PLS-complete. We establish that coarse correlated equilibria also attain a PoA bound of at most $2+o_λ(1)$, and this guarantee in fact extends even under the payment rule induced by the Shapley value. Moreover, we move beyond monotone submodular value functions and binary actions. First, for (monotone) XOS valuations, we show that no oracle-efficient payment rule can attain a PoA bound of $O(n^{1/2 - ε})$. Second, for submodular but non-monotone valuations, we show that a broad class of natural payment rules fails to guarantee a bounded PoA. Finally, we extend compensation design to the setting where each agent has a combinatorial action set. We provide randomized payment rules with logarithmic PoA guarantees for subadditive values, and matching lower bounds that apply even in the single-agent additive-value setting.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

The Computational Complexity of Team Zero-Sum Games

A celebrated consequence of the minimax theorem is that two-player zero-sum games admit a tractable equilibrium characterization. In many central applications, however, each side comprises multiple independent agents who share a common objective but cannot perfectly coordinate their actions. Such settings can be modeled as \emph{team zero-sum games}, a natural generalization of both two-player zero-sum games and potential games -- the two most well-studied classes of games in algorithmic game theory. In this paper, we settle the complexity of team zero-sum games by establishing that computing Nash equilibria is \PPAD-complete. As a result, despite the global adversarial structure, team zero-sum games are as hard as general-sum games. Our hardness result holds even when i) the precision is inverse polynomial, thereby ruling out a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (unless $¶= \PPAD$); ii) each team consists of only two players; and iii) the underlying class of games is polymatrix. As a byproduct, we resolve the complexity of group-wise zero-sum polymatrix games, a class introduced and examined in the seminal work of Cai and Daskalakis (SODA '11), and more recently highlighted by Hollender, Maystre, and Nagarajan (ICLR '25). Moreover, we show that computing a first-order stationary point in min-max optimization is \PPAD-complete even for quadratic (multilinear) objectives. From a technical standpoint, we develop a series of team zero-sum game gadgets that allow us to simulate the breakthrough reduction of Bernasconi and Castiglioni (STOC '26). Moreover, to obtain hardness results for quadratic objectives, we make use of a general technique based on linear local approximation, which is of independent interest.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Aligning Data-Driven Predictors with Allocation: A Decision-Focused Approach to Survival Analysis

Machine learning predictors have become essential tools for guiding automated decision making. However, a major misalignment persists: predictive models are typically optimized in terms of standard statistical metrics in isolation from the algorithmic tasks they inform. We highlight this incongruity in the high-stakes domain of organ allocation by demonstrating that any algorithm relying on (even highly accurate) survival predictors optimized for standard metrics -- such as the Concordance index (C-index) -- can yield arbitrarily poor outcomes when used for allocation, failing to guarantee utility better than a uniform random selection. To bridge the gap between survival analysis and policy optimization, we introduce a decision-focused learning approach based on optimizing normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG), a mainstay metric in information retrieval. We establish the utility of NDCG in survival analysis by proving that it translates to guarantees on the performance of allocation. Empirically, we propose a bootstrapping approach to optimize the NDCG of existing survival models. Unlike prior work, we also address the challenge of right censorship when evaluating ranking. On historical heart transplant data from the US, our method dramatically boosts the NDCG of baseline models by 50-100%, which translates to tens of thousands of additional life years gained annually when deployed for transplant allocation. We anticipate that our framework will find broader applications in decision making with predictions.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Position: Machine Learning for Heart Transplant Allocation Policy Optimization Should Account for Incentives

The allocation of scarce donor organs constitutes one of the most consequential algorithmic challenges in healthcare. While the field is rapidly transitioning from rigid, rule-based systems to machine learning and data-driven optimization, we argue that current approaches often overlook a fundamental barrier: incentives. In this position paper, we highlight that organ allocation is not merely an optimization problem, but rather a complex game involving organ procurement organizations, transplant centers, clinicians, patients, and regulators. Focusing on US adult heart transplant allocation, we identify critical incentive misalignments across the decision-making pipeline, and present data showing that they are having adverse consequences today. Our main position is that the next generation of allocation policies should be incentive aware. We outline a research agenda for the machine learning community, calling for the integration of mechanism design, strategic classification, causal inference, and social choice to ensure robustness, efficiency, fairness, and trust in the face of strategic behavior from the various constituent groups.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Swap Regret Minimization Through Response-Based Approachability

We consider the problem of minimizing different notions of swap regret in online optimization. These forms of regret are tightly connected to correlated equilibrium concepts in games, and have been more recently shown to guarantee non-manipulability against strategic adversaries. The only computationally efficient algorithm for minimizing linear swap regret over a general convex set in $\mathbb{R}^d$ was developed recently by Daskalakis, Farina, Fishelson, Pipis, and Schneider (STOC '25). However, it incurs a highly suboptimal regret bound of $Ω(d^4 \sqrt{T})$ and also relies on computationally intensive calls to the ellipsoid algorithm at each iteration. In this paper, we develop a significantly simpler, computationally efficient algorithm that guarantees $O(d \sqrt{T})$ linear swap regret for a general convex set that has been preconditioned via the John ellipsoid. Our algorithm leverages the powerful response-based approachability framework of Bernstein and Shimkin (JMLR~'15) -- previously overlooked in the line of work on swap regret minimization -- and simultaneously minimizes profile swap regret, which was recently shown to guarantee non-manipulability. Moreover, we establish a matching information-theoretic lower bound: any learner must incur in expectation $Ω(d \sqrt{T})$ linear swap regret for large enough $T$, even when the set is centrally symmetric. This also shows that the classic algorithm of Gordon, Greenwald, and Marks (ICML '08) is existentially optimal for minimizing linear swap regret, although it is computationally inefficient. Finally, we extend our approach to minimize regret with respect to the set of swap deviations with polynomial dimension, unifying and strengthening recent results in equilibrium computation and online learning.

cs.LG↗