arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.19488

What You Earn from What You Learn: Characterization and Complexity of the Value of Information

Ratip Emin Berker·Ioannis Anagnostides·Emanuel Tewolde·Brian Hu Zhang·Tuomas Sandholm·Vincent Conitzer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We examine the value of information in extensive-form decision problems: the largest multiplicative gain that a decision maker can obtain from an information refinement, taken over all payoff environments. This measures the structural importance of information disentangled from any particular payoff specification, and generalizes the notion of value of recall recently introduced by Berker et al. (AAAI'25). We establish a unifying characterization of the value of information under any information refinement, uncovering an intriguing connection to the maximum fractional chromatic number over a certain family of conflict graphs. We then employ our characterization to elucidate the complexity of two central information refinements. First, for the value of perfect information in perfect-recall decision problems, we find that the relevant conflict graphs are cographs, so the fractional chromatic number collapses to the clique number. Even though the clique number is tractable for a given cograph, we show that the additional layer of optimization (over the family of graphs) makes computing the value of perfect information NP-complete. On the positive side, we prove fixed-parameter tractability in terms of the degree of imperfect information. Second, for the value of recall in imperfect-recall decision problems (with no absentmindedness), we first show that the value of recall can realize the fractional chromatic number of any graph. Interestingly, this implies that, unlike the value of perfect information, the value of recall can take fractional values. Building on this reduction, we then establish S2P-completeness. This addresses questions left open by Berker et al. (AAAI'25)---both on the characterization and the complexity of the value of recall---and shows that computing the value of recall is strictly harder than the value of perfect information.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ratip Emin Berker, Ioannis Anagnostides, Emanuel Tewolde, Brian Hu Zhang, Tuomas Sandholm, Vincent Conitzer. 2026-10-14. What You Earn from What You Learn: Characterization and Complexity of the Value of Information. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19488

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Characterization and Computation of Normal-Form Proper Equilibria in Extensive-Form Games via the Sequence-Form Representation

Normal-form proper equilibrium, introduced by Myerson as a refinement of normal-form perfect equilibrium, plays an important role in the equilibrium analysis of extensive-form games because of its stronger stability properties. However, the exponential growth of the normal-form representation makes existing approaches for directly computing normal-form proper equilibria computationally impractical. To address this challenge, we introduce sequence-form proper equilibrium by defining a maximal payoff function over sequences, and prove its strategic equivalence to normal-form proper equilibrium. For computation, we further derive an equivalent formulation of sequence-form proper equilibrium via a class of perturbed games in sequence form, in which the perturbed realization-plan space is induced by imposing probability lower bounds on restricted sequence sets to encode the desired perturbation hierarchy. Based on this formulation, we develop two differentiable path-following methods for computing normal-form proper equilibria. These methods rely on artificial sequence-form games in which the expected payoff functions are regularized by logarithmic or entropy terms through an auxiliary variable. For each method, as the auxiliary variable tends to zero, the limit point of the induced smooth equilibrium path can derive one or more normal-form proper equilibria of the original game. Finally, Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed methods.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Incentivize Contribution and Learn Parameters Too: Federated Learning with Strategic Data Owners

In federated learning (FL), a center trains a shared model from updates that clients compute on their private data. Collecting and training on data is costly, so a strategic client may contribute little data and free-ride on the model trained by the others. We study mechanisms that incentivize data contribution and learn the model at the same time. Our first mechanism, UPBReD, updates the clients ' contributions and the model jointly, and converges at a geometric rate to a Nash equilibrium of the contribution game together with the welfare-maximizing model for those contributions. This equilibrium can involve under-contribution, so our second mechanism, 2P-UPBReD, adds budget-balanced transfers that make full contribution a dominant strategy, after which training converges to the optimal model; we also give conditions under which every client prefers to participate. Both mechanisms trust what clients report about the data they use and the gradients they compute. We show that no payment rule can reward unverifiable contributions unless something the center observes depends on the data actually used. Building on this, T-2P-UPBReD checks each client's reported contribution against the other clients ' realized valuations of the trained model, and prices gradient reports with a budget-balanced charge. It elicits truthful contribution reports, makes gradient reports approximately truthful, still reaches full contribution and the optimal model, and never runs a deficit. Experiments on CIFAR-10, FEMNIST, and Twitter show that 2P-UPBReD matches the welfare of FedAvg trained on all data, while strategic clients without incentives lower the welfare of the learned model.

cs.GT↗