arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Francisco Herrera

Publications and source records attributed to Francisco Herrera.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

DISCERN: Distributional Synthetic Replay for Retain-Free Incremental Machine Unlearning

Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific training data from a trained model without retraining from scratch. In real deployments, however, deletion requests arrive over time, calling for incremental class unlearning (ICU): classes are removed sequentially, previously forgotten knowledge must remain forgotten, and the remaining classes must be preserved. We present DIstributional SynthetiC rEplay for Retain-free iNcremental unlearning (DISCERN), an intervention-based class unlearning method that replaces access to the retain set with synthetic embeddings sampled from per-class parametric distributions. Unlike prototype-based replay, which assumes an isotropic Gaussian around each class centroid, DISCERN fits Euclidean (Gaussian, Laplace, Student's $t$) and directional (von Mises--Fisher, Fisher--Bingham) families to each class and selects among them through statistical tests and, when none of them accepts, cross-validated log-likelihood. This design is motivated by the architecture-dependent latent geometry: transformer embeddings lie approximately on a hypersphere and concentrate around class directions, unlike those of convolutional networks. We evaluate DISCERN against seven retain-free baselines on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 with two convolutional and two transformer backbones, under single-class, multi-class, and incremental unlearning. DISCERN is competitive when classes are removed at once and is the most stable method in ICU on transformers: on ViT-B/16, after 20 sequential deletions it retains a harmonic mean of $0.797$, whereas the strongest method in the simultaneous setting drops from $0.918$ to $0.048$. A paired ablation shows that per-class distribution selection substantially reduces the resurfacing of previously forgotten classes, acting as a stabilizer of accumulated forgetting rather than a uniform improvement.

cs.LG↗

Trustworthy AI and Democracy: A Dual Taxonomy and Operational Framework of Democratic Risks and Contributions

Artificial Intelligence (AI) can undermine and strengthen democratic governance. This paper introduces the AIRD/AIPD framework, a dual taxonomy and operational framework for analyzing AI's democratic risks and conditional contributions. The AI Risks to Democracy (AIRD) taxonomy identifies threats to autonomy, fairness, public discourse, democratic institutions, and trust, while the AI's Positive Contributions to Democracy (AIPD) taxonomy captures AI's potential to enhance efficiency, accessibility, security, informed citizenry, transparency and accountability, inclusive democratic dialogue, and evidence-based policymaking. Grounded in five democratic principles and the seven Trustworthy AI requirements proposed by the European Commission's High-Level Expert Group on AI, the framework connects democratic goals with governance and design mechanisms. It provides an operational process for identifying affected contexts and actors, classifying primary and secondary AIRD/AIPD effects, mapping them to relevant Trustworthy AI requirements, and defining proportionate governance responses and responsible actors. An operational mapping and two worked examples illustrate its application to electoral misinformation and AI-assisted public service allocation. The analysis highlights the transversal relevance of transparency, accountability, fairness, and societal wellbeing, while recognizing trade-offs, implementation costs, differential impacts, institutional capacity, and contextual variation across democratic settings. The framework is conceptual and has not been empirically validated, but it offers a traceable and adaptable basis for research, policy analysis, institutional oversight, and responsible AI design. By connecting democratic diagnosis with governance action, it bridges the gap between normative principles and the operational requirements of trustworthy and democratically legitimate AI.

cs.CY↗

Statistical Detection of Positional Bias in LLM-Based Recommender Systems: Methodologies and Empirical Evidence

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as recommendation generators in conversational recommender systems (RS) via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). This flexible design introduces new sources of structural bias. This paper studies positional bias in top-1 and single-turn LLM-based RS: systematic dependence of the recommended item on the order in which candidates are presented in the prompt. We propose two complementary detection methodologies: (i) POB-ICM, based on contingency matrix analysis and Chi-square independence testing, and (ii) POB-UNBP, a sample-efficient approach derived from a uniformity null model under permutation-based evaluation, enabling stochastic decoding with formal statistical guarantees. Using a controlled RAG testbed for product recommendation, built on a real product catalog, a fixed prompt template and 2000 template-generated user queries with 20 permutations each (40,000 instances), both methodologies reject the null hypothesis of positional independence and uniformity in all evaluated state-of-the-art models. We introduce three complementary metrics -- permutation sensitivity, positional bias, and strong positional bias -- to quantify this effect, the latter targeting cases where the position displaces the recommendation towards clearly less relevant items rather than only choosing among comparably relevant ones. A robustness analysis across candidate-set size and decoding temperature shows that the bias is structural and model-dependent, not an artifact of deterministic decoding or candidate-set size. These results establish positional bias as a measurable, reproducible property of prompt-mediated recommendation pipelines in the evaluated setting and motivate routine auditing and governance controls (e.g., order randomization, standardized prompting) for deployed LLM-based RS. Source code is publicly released.

cs.IR↗

What Human-AI Interaction Leaves Behind: Residual Human States -- A Trajectory-Based Framework and Multi-Study Analysis

Human-AI Interaction is commonly evaluated by what an artificial agent enables during use, yet interaction can also alter the human who acts next. We introduce Residual Human States, a trajectory-based framework for representing the potentially multidimensional human state carried forward after interaction with AI, relative to a relevant alternative trajectory. The framework distinguishes assisted output from human-state transition and derives four empirical propositions: multidimensionality, interaction-policy dependence, horizon dissociation, and temporal persistence. Its central claim is that assisted performance does not by itself determine the human state carried forward. We examine these propositions through four empirical cases with different inferential roles. Published medical-training evidence illustrates how one AI interaction history can be associated with both slightly higher observed accuracy on some later unaided cases and transmission of a systematic decision bias on others. A second diagnostic-learning study shows that later unaided behaviour differs across AI-support policies, while also revealing that aggregate accuracy cannot by itself distinguish improved discrimination from a shifted response criterion. In a classroom experiment, generative-AI tutoring substantially improved assisted practice performance without a corresponding detectable gain on a subsequent unaided exam. A longitudinal reanalysis of personalised AI dialogue further shows that residual contrasts can evolve across post-interaction horizons and that such change may arise from the comparison trajectory as well as from the focal intervention. Evaluating interactive AI systems therefore requires attention not only to contemporaneous performance, but also to which human states alternative interaction trajectories produce, relative to which counterfactuals, and how durably.

cs.HC↗

Do LLM Agents Execute the Plans They Declare? From Planning-Mode Declaration to Pattern-Specific Execution

Large language models (LLMs) enable agents to solve long-horizon tasks by generating a plan and then executing it in an environment. However, successful planning requires two distinct capabilities: selecting an appropriate plan for the task and executing it faithfully. Existing planner--executor systems can fail at either stage, while final task success alone cannot distinguish selection from execution failures. We therefore study the Plan Declaration--Execution Gap and introduce Planning-as-Routing, where an LLM declares one of four planning modes: Predefined, Sequential, Hierarchical, or Search, and a deterministic router dispatches the task to the corresponding pattern-specific executor. Across four benchmarks and three LLMs, we find three consistent patterns. First, generic Plan+ReAct often fails to preserve declared planning structure, especially for longer plans: across three benchmarks, only (22)--(45%) of trajectories preserve it, whereas pattern-specific executors enforce the intended structure. Second, planning-mode effectiveness varies across environments and models: Search performs best on ALFWorld, Hierarchical on SWE-bench, and the strongest pattern can vary across models within the same benchmark. Third, the largest gains come from execution: pattern-specific executors improve task success from (0.48) to (0.92) on ALFWorld and from (0.36) to (0.44) on SWE-bench Verified over Plan+ReAct. Current LLMs, however, do not reliably select the strongest mode for each task, although few-shot examples improve selection in some benchmark--model combinations. Overall, reliable agent planning requires both effective mode selection and faithful execution: routing substantially closes the execution gap, while task-specific mode selection remains open.

cs.AI↗

Governing Artificial Intelligence as a Macro Socio-Technical Regime: The F-I-C-P Framework for Regime-Level AI Infrastructure and Governance

Artificial intelligence (AI) is often analysed through technical, organisational, or regulatory perspectives that treat capability, adoption, and governance as separate issues. This article conceptualises AI instead as an emerging macro socio-technical regime generated through the interaction of finance, infrastructure, capability, and productivity. It develops the F-I-C-P framework to explain how finance enables infrastructure, infrastructure conditions capability, and capability creates the possibility--but not the guarantee--of productivity and value realisation. The article also introduces the concept of regime-level AI infrastructure to identify concrete configurations, such as AI Gigafactories, foundation-model platforms, national compute infrastructures, public AI platforms, sectoral AI ecosystems, and corporate AI infrastructures, through which the macro-regime becomes observable and evaluable. The central analytical problem is structural misalignment: the risk that financial expectations, infrastructural expansion, technical capability, organisational absorption, productivity realisation, governance capacity, and societal outcomes evolve at different speeds or under unequal conditions of power. Governance is therefore conceptualised not as a final stage after technological deployment, but as a transversal and anticipatory steering capacity. Briefly illustrated through Spain and Chile as non-frontier configurations, the article argues that AI governance should be understood as regime alignment: the task of anticipating, evaluating, and correcting structural misalignments before they become embedded in infrastructural dependencies, organisational routines, market structures, and international asymmetries.

cs.CY↗

DenoGrad: A Gradient-Based Framework for Data Refinement in Tabular and Time-Series Learning

In the Data-Centric Artificial Intelligence (AI) paradigm, improving data quality is essential for robust machine learning. However, many denoising methods rely on rigid statistical assumptions or require clean reference data, which limits their applicability in real-world scenarios. In this work, we propose DenoGrad, a gradient-based framework for data refinement that leverages a pretrained neural network to iteratively correct noisy observations by optimizing the input space while keeping the model fixed. DenoGrad is applicable to both tabular regression and time-series forecasting, and incorporates a consensus-based strategy to ensure temporally coherent updates in sequential settings. Experiments on ten real-world datasets show that the proposed approach yields consistent improvements in downstream predictive performance while preserving the statistical structure of the data, as measured by distributional and correlation-based metrics. In addition, DenoGrad can improve generalization in nominally clean datasets, acting as a form of dataset-level regularization. These results support model-guided data refinement as a practical component of data-centric machine learning workflows. Code is available at: https://github.com/ari-dasci/S-DenoGrad.

cs.AI↗

From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.0

Federated Learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative learning, yet deployments increasingly show that privacy guarantees alone do not sustain trust in high-risk settings. As FL systems move toward agentic AI, large language model-enabled, and dynamically adaptive architectures, trustworthiness becomes a system-level problem shaped by autonomous decision-making, non-stationary environments, and multi-stakeholder governance. We argue for Trustworthy FL (TFL), treating trust as a continuously maintained operating condition rather than a static model property. Through the lens of Trust Report 2.0, we propose a requirement-driven taxonomy of challenges grounded in TAI and explicitly extended to account for control-plane decisions, agency, and system dynamics across the federated lifecycle. Building on this diagnosis, we introduce a coordination blueprint that structures cross-requirement trade-offs, decision justification, and governance alignment in TFL systems. To operationalize assurance, Trust Report 2.0 is instantiated as a lightweight, privacy-preserving artifact that surfaces decision-centric trust evidence without centralizing raw data. We illustrate applicability via healthcare as a stress-test domain, focusing on oncology FL under regulatory pressure and clinical risk.

cs.AI↗

Resilient Federated Chain: Transforming Blockchain Consensus into an Active Defense Layer for Federated Learning

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a key paradigm for building Trustworthy AI systems by enabling privacy-preserving, decentralized model training. However, FL is highly susceptible to adversarial attacks that compromise model integrity and data confidentiality, a vulnerability exacerbated by the fact that conventional data inspection methods are incompatible with its decentralized design. While integrating FL with Blockchain technology has been proposed to address some limitations, its potential for mitigating adversarial attacks remains largely unexplored. This paper introduces Resilient Federated Chain (RFC), a novel blockchain-enabled FL framework designed specifically to enhance resilience against such threats. RFC builds upon the existing Proof of Federated Learning architecture by repurposing the redundancy of its Pooled Mining mechanism as an active defense layer that can be combined with robust aggregation rules. Furthermore, the framework introduces a flexible evaluation function in its consensus mechanism, allowing for adaptive defense against different attack strategies. Extensive experimental evaluation on image classification tasks under various adversarial scenarios, demonstrates that RFC significantly improves robustness compared to baseline methods, providing a viable solution for securing decentralized learning environments.

cs.CR↗

Featured Reproducing Kernel Banach Spaces for Learning and Neural Networks

Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces provide a foundational framework for kernel-based learning, where regularization and interpolation problems admit finite-dimensional solutions through classical representer theorems. Many modern learning models, however -- including fixed-architecture neural networks equipped with non-quadratic norms -- naturally give rise to non-Hilbertian geometries that fall outside this setting. In Banach spaces, continuity of point-evaluation functionals alone is insufficient to guarantee feature representations or kernel-based learning formulations. In this work, we develop a functional-analytic framework for learning in Banach spaces based on the notion of featured reproducing kernel Banach spaces. We identify the precise structural conditions under which feature maps, kernel constructions, and representer-type results can be recovered beyond the Hilbertian regime. Within this framework, supervised learning is formulated as a minimal-norm interpolation or regularization problem, and existence results together with conditional representer theorems are established. We further extend the theory to vector-valued featured reproducing kernel Banach spaces and show that fixed-architecture neural networks naturally induce special instances of such spaces. This provides a unified function-space perspective on kernel methods and neural networks and clarifies when kernel-based learning principles extend beyond reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces.

cs.LG↗

SeNeDiF-OOD: Semantic Nested Dichotomy Fusion for Out-of-Distribution Detection Methodology in Open-World Classification. A Case Study on Monument Style Classification

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a fundamental requirement for the reliable deployment of artificial intelligence applications in open-world environments. However, addressing the heterogeneous nature of OOD data, ranging from low-level corruption to semantic shifts, remains a complex challenge that single-stage detectors often fail to resolve. To address this issue, we propose SeNeDiF-OOD, a novel methodology based on Semantic Nested Dichotomy Fusion. This framework decomposes the detection task into a hierarchical structure of binary fusion nodes, where each layer is designed to integrate decision boundaries aligned with specific levels of semantic abstraction. To validate the proposed framework, we present a comprehensive case study using MonuMAI, a real-world architectural style recognition system exposed to an open environment. This application faces a diverse range of inputs, including non-monument images, unknown architectural styles, and adversarial attacks, making it an ideal testbed for our proposal. Through extensive experimental evaluation in this domain, results demonstrate that our hierarchical fusion methodology significantly outperforms traditional baselines, effectively filtering these diverse OOD categories while preserving in-distribution performance.

cs.CV↗

Data Science: a Natural Ecosystem

This manuscript provides a systemic and data-centric view of what we term essential data science, as a natural ecosystem with challenges and missions stemming from the fusion of data universe with its multiple combinations of the 5D complexities (data structure, domain, cardinality, causality, and ethics) with the phases of the data life cycle. Data agents perform tasks driven by specific goals. The data scientist is an abstract entity that comes from the logical organization of data agents with their actions. Data scientists face challenges that are defined according to the missions. We define specific discipline-induced data science, which in turn allows for the definition of pan-data science, a natural ecosystem that integrates specific disciplines with the essential data science. We semantically split the essential data science into computational, and foundational. By formalizing this ecosystemic view, we contribute a general-purpose, fusion-oriented architecture for integrating heterogeneous knowledge, agents, and workflows-relevant to a wide range of disciplines and high-impact applications.

cs.LG↗

A Framework for Responsible AI Systems: Building Societal Trust through Domain Definition, Trustworthy AI Design, Auditability, Accountability, and Governance

Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) addresses the ethical and regulatory challenges of deploying AI systems in high-risk scenarios. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for the design of an RAI system (RAIS) that integrates five key dimensions: domain definition, trustworthy AI design, auditability, accountability, and governance. Unlike prior work that treats these components in isolation, our proposal emphasizes their inter-dependencies and iterative feedback loops, enabling proactive and reactive accountability throughout the AI lifecycle. Beyond presenting the framework, we synthesize recent developments in global AI governance and analyze limitations in existing principles-based approaches, highlighting fragmentation, implementation gaps, and the need for participatory governance. The paper also identifies critical challenges and research directions for the RAIS framework, including sector-specific adaptation and operationalization, to support certification, post-deployment monitoring, and risk-based auditing. By bridging technical design and institutional responsibility, this work offers a practical blueprint for embedding responsibility throughout the AI lifecycle, enabling transparent, ethically aligned, and legally compliant AI-based systems.

cs.CY↗

A three-Level Framework for LLM-Enhanced eXplainable AI: From technical explanations to natural language

The growing application of artificial intelligence in sensitive domains has intensified the demand for systems that are not only accurate but also explainable and trustworthy. Although explainable AI (XAI) methods have proliferated, many do not consider the diverse audiences that interact with AI systems: from developers and domain experts to end-users and society. This paper addresses how trust in AI is influenced by the design and delivery of explanations and proposes a multilevel framework that aligns explanations with the epistemic, contextual, and ethical expectations of different stakeholders. The framework consists of three layers: algorithmic and domain-based, human-centered, and social explainability, with Large Language Models serving as crucial mediators that transform technical outputs of AI explanations into accessible, contextual narratives across all levels. We show how LLMs enable dynamic, conversational explanations that bridge the gap between complex model behavior and human understanding, facilitating interactive dialogue and enhancing societal transparency. Through comprehensive case studies, we show how this LLM-enhanced approach achieves technical fidelity, user engagement, and societal accountability, reframing XAI as a dynamic, trust-building process that leverages natural language capabilities to democratize AI explainability.

cs.AI↗

Semantic-Inductive Attribute Selection for Zero-Shot Learning

Zero-Shot Learning is an important paradigm within General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence Systems, particularly in those that operate in open-world scenarios where systems must adapt to new tasks dynamically. Semantic spaces play a pivotal role as they bridge seen and unseen classes, but whether human-annotated or generated by a machine learning model, they often contain noisy, redundant, or irrelevant attributes that hinder performance. To address this, we introduce a partitioning scheme that simulates unseen conditions in an inductive setting (which is the most challenging), allowing attribute relevance to be assessed without access to semantic information from unseen classes. Within this framework, we study two complementary feature-selection strategies and assess their generalisation. The first adapts embedded feature selection to the particular demands of ZSL, turning model-driven rankings into meaningful semantic pruning; the second leverages evolutionary computation to directly explore the space of attribute subsets more broadly. Experiments on five benchmark datasets (AWA2, CUB, SUN, aPY, FLO) show that both methods consistently improve accuracy on unseen classes by reducing redundancy, but in complementary ways: RFS is efficient and competitive though dependent on critical hyperparameters, whereas GA is more costly yet explores the search space more broadly and avoids such dependence. These results confirm that semantic spaces are inherently redundant and highlight the proposed partitioning scheme as an effective tool to refine them under inductive conditions.

cs.LG↗

DCV-ROOD Evaluation Framework: Dual Cross-Validation for Robust Out-of-Distribution Detection

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection plays a key role in enhancing the robustness of artificial intelligence systems by identifying inputs that differ significantly from the training distribution, thereby preventing unreliable predictions and enabling appropriate fallback mechanisms. Developing reliable OOD detection methods is a significant challenge, and rigorous evaluation of these techniques is essential for ensuring their effectiveness, as it allows researchers to assess their performance under diverse conditions and to identify potential limitations or failure modes. Cross-validation (CV) has proven to be a highly effective tool for providing a reasonable estimate of the performance of a learning algorithm. Although OOD scenarios exhibit particular characteristics, an appropriate adaptation of CV can lead to a suitable evaluation framework for this setting. This work proposes a dual CV framework for robust evaluation of OOD detection models, aimed at improving the reliability of their assessment. The proposed evaluation framework aims to effectively integrate in-distribution (ID) and OOD data while accounting for their differing characteristics. To achieve this, ID data are partitioned using a conventional approach, whereas OOD data are divided by grouping samples based on their classes. Furthermore, we analyze the context of data with class hierarchy to propose a data splitting that considers the entire class hierarchy to obtain fair ID-OOD partitions to apply the proposed evaluation framework. This framework is called Dual Cross-Validation for Robust Out-of-Distribution Detection (DCV-ROOD). To test the validity of the evaluation framework, we selected a set of state-of-the-art OOD detection methods, both with and without outlier exposure. The results show that the method achieves very fast convergence to the true performance.

cs.LG↗

Triadic Fusion of Cognitive, Functional, and Causal Dimensions for Explainable LLMs: The TAXAL Framework

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed in high-risk domains where opacity, bias, and instability undermine trust and accountability. Traditional explainability methods, focused on surface outputs, do not capture the reasoning pathways, planning logic, and systemic impacts of agentic LLMs. We introduce TAXAL (Triadic Alignment for eXplainability in Agentic LLMs), a triadic fusion framework that unites three complementary dimensions: cognitive (user understanding), functional (practical utility), and causal (faithful reasoning). TAXAL provides a unified, role-sensitive foundation for designing, evaluating, and deploying explanations in diverse sociotechnical settings. Our analysis synthesizes existing methods, ranging from post-hoc attribution and dialogic interfaces to explanation-aware prompting, and situates them within the TAXAL triadic fusion model. We further demonstrate its applicability through case studies in law, education, healthcare, and public services, showing how explanation strategies adapt to institutional constraints and stakeholder roles. By combining conceptual clarity with design patterns and deployment pathways, TAXAL advances explainability as a technical and sociotechnical practice, supporting trustworthy and context-sensitive LLM applications in the era of agentic AI.

cs.CL↗

Local Attention Mechanism: Boosting the Transformer Architecture for Long-Sequence Time Series Forecasting

Transformers have become the leading choice in natural language processing over other deep learning architectures. This trend has also permeated the field of time series analysis, especially for long-horizon forecasting, showcasing promising results both in performance and running time. In this paper, we introduce Local Attention Mechanism (LAM), an efficient attention mechanism tailored for time series analysis. This mechanism exploits the continuity properties of time series to reduce the number of attention scores computed. We present an algorithm for implementing LAM in tensor algebra that runs in time and memory O(nlogn), significantly improving upon the O(n^2) time and memory complexity of traditional attention mechanisms. We also note the lack of proper datasets to evaluate long-horizon forecast models. Thus, we propose a novel set of datasets to improve the evaluation of models addressing long-horizon forecasting challenges. Our experimental analysis demonstrates that the vanilla transformer architecture magnified with LAM surpasses state-of-the-art models, including the vanilla attention mechanism. These results confirm the effectiveness of our approach and highlight a range of future challenges in long-sequence time series forecasting.

cs.LG↗