arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.32985

Governing Artificial Intelligence as a Macro Socio-Technical Regime: The F-I-C-P Framework for Regime-Level AI Infrastructure and Governance

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is often analysed through technical, organisational, or regulatory perspectives that treat capability, adoption, and governance as separate issues. This article conceptualises AI instead as an emerging macro socio-technical regime generated through the interaction of finance, infrastructure, capability, and productivity. It develops the F-I-C-P framework to explain how finance enables infrastructure, infrastructure conditions capability, and capability creates the possibility--but not the guarantee--of productivity and value realisation. The article also introduces the concept of regime-level AI infrastructure to identify concrete configurations, such as AI Gigafactories, foundation-model platforms, national compute infrastructures, public AI platforms, sectoral AI ecosystems, and corporate AI infrastructures, through which the macro-regime becomes observable and evaluable. The central analytical problem is structural misalignment: the risk that financial expectations, infrastructural expansion, technical capability, organisational absorption, productivity realisation, governance capacity, and societal outcomes evolve at different speeds or under unequal conditions of power. Governance is therefore conceptualised not as a final stage after technological deployment, but as a transversal and anticipatory steering capacity. Briefly illustrated through Spain and Chile as non-frontier configurations, the article argues that AI governance should be understood as regime alignment: the task of anticipating, evaluating, and correcting structural misalignments before they become embedded in infrastructural dependencies, organisational routines, market structures, and international asymmetries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francisco Herrera. 2026-08-16. Governing Artificial Intelligence as a Macro Socio-Technical Regime: The F-I-C-P Framework for Regime-Level AI Infrastructure and Governance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32985

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Digital Security Under Compound Threats: Surveillance, Threat Reasoning, and Habituation Among North Korean Defectors in China

North Korean defectors residing in China face persistent uncertainty regarding digital security and privacy. Through semi-structured interviews with 19 defectors, we examine how individuals understand digital threats and adapt their security behaviors. We identify three interrelated conditions: transnational surveillance pressure from North Korea, identity-linked digital infrastructure and intermediary dependency in China, and threat reasoning shaped by prior surveillance schemas. Participants developed uneven protective practices and followed two trajectories: adaptive habituation driven by knowledge acquisition and erosive habituation driven by the prolonged absence of adverse events. Our findings show how compound threats, attribution uncertainty, and constrained agency shape security reasoning among undocumented users.

cs.CY↗

The Popular Get More Popular: Auditing Brand Bias in Generative Search

The shift from traditional to generative search has fundamentally transformed online product discovery. Because conversational recommendations synthesize choices into a few direct answers, subtle systemic preferences toward specific providers can exert profound commercial impacts. In this work, we audit this phenomenon through two distinct dimensions: (i) brand popularity bias, the systematic preference for market-dominant entities over long-tail alternatives, and (ii) brand familiarity bias, the ranking advantage an entity encoded in an LLM's parametric memory holds over an unfamiliar competitor. First, evaluating commercial queries across major engines, we observe persistent brand popularity bias: dominant brands in the top quintile are cited 1.4x to 2.8x more frequently than the average brand within a sample of 1,176 top market players, already present in parametric memory that external web retrieval fails to mitigate. Second, through controlled in-context experiments holding product attributes constant, we find that substituting authentic brand signatures with unfamiliar ones significantly degrades recommendation rank. Conversely, fact-preserving content rewrites yield negligible ranking gains. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that generative search engines reinforce a ``rich-get-richer'' dynamic by favoring established market leaders and imposing a parametric barrier to entry that standard content optimization cannot overcome.

cs.CY↗

Operationalizing NCII and CSAM Law in the Age of AI: Open Problems

Advances in generative AI have driven a surge in synthetic non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII) and child sexual abuse material (CSAM), prompting a series of legal reforms. These reforms rely on legal definitions where technical operationalization is ambiguous, such as whether a depicted person is identifiable, whether a model is capable of or intended for abuse generation, and whether an abusive image can be traced to the model that produced it. Drawing on the law of England and Wales and the United States, we examine the relevant law alongside the technical research needed to operationalize it. From this, we develop a research agenda of open problems at this technical-legal interface, spanning the interpretation of existing law, the prevention of harm before an AI tool is deployed, and enforcement of offenses. These are problems the technical community is well placed to solve, and where progress is vital to real-world protection.

cs.CY↗