arXiv subjects

Biplab Sikdar

Publications and source records attributed to Biplab Sikdar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

CHISEL-ing Back Source Code with AI-enabled Iterative Recovery

Decompilation aims to recover high-level, compilable, and semantically equivalent code from binaries. Traditional decompilers produce pseudo-C that is difficult to read and does not compile, while the recent LLM-assisted approaches generate readable, but semantically incorrect code. LLM-aided iterative recovery is an emerging branch of research, but prior works rely on supplied test suites for semantic recovery. In this work, we present CHISEL, a test suite-free framework to iteratively recover source code from Ghidra-derived pseudo-C. CHISEL uses simple yet effective feedback from a compiler (static analysis) and a coverage-guided fuzzer (differential analysis), augmented by rich observables for grounded divergence detection and feedback, cross-iteration divergence memory, and best candidate retention. We systematically evaluate CHISEL for compilation and semantic recovery, feedback oracle soundness, and iteration overhead on 120 ExeBench functions compiled for the x86-64 architecture, across four optimizations (O0-O3), in both stripped and unstripped variants, using the open-weight Gemma4:31b LLM. CHISEL, with all recommended features, achieves an average of 96.1% re-compilability and 79.8% re-executability rates at an average of 2.1 iterations. Significantly, CHISEL recovers 26% of first-generation execution errors. At the same time, CHISEL feedback oracle falsely accepts only 9.4% candidates. Lastly, CHISEL performs significantly better than two recent prior work on LLM-assisted decompilation.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

CDN Tsunami: Exploiting HTTP/3-HTTP/1.1 Conversion for DoS Attacks

Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) provide high availability, accelerate content delivery for their host websites, but are also vulnerable to different types of Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks. Prior works have studied a variety of DoS attacks with HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2 connections, but most of them are being fixed, making CDNs robust against such attacks. One unexplored research area is how the recent introduction of HTTP/3 at CDNs affects the DoS attack landscape, especially when there are heterogeneous deployments of HTTP/3 and HTTP/1.1 between CDNs and host websites. In this paper, we design the first study of DoS attacks against HTTP/3 protocols deployed at CDNs. Our key insight is that when the CDN adopts HTTP/3 but the host websites use HTTP/1.1, an adversary can utilize the disparity to amplify a small amount of traffic to the CDN using HTTP/3 to a large amount from the CDN to the host website using HTTP/1.1. More specifically, we design two attack variations-HTTP/3 Bandwidth Amplification (HBA) and HTTP/3 Connection Amplification (HCA)-targeting the bandwidth and the number of connections, respectively. Furthermore, we conduct a large-scale measurement upon the Tranco Top 1M domain list to quantify the real-world impact of these attacks, identifying 42,330 subdomains that are potentially vulnerable to our attacks. Finally, we responsibly disclose the details of our attacks to the affected CDN vendors: so far, two vendors have already acknowledged their vulnerabilities with bounties and have deployed our mitigations.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Selection Integrity for LLM Graph Memory: An Accumulability Criterion for Information-Flow-Blind Retrieval

Agent memory is moving to graphs, and the provenance defenses now being built for it all check one thing: the provenance of the records an agent retrieves. We show that this entire class of defense is blind by construction. A long-term graph memory runs a global selection step over writable graph structure, so structure that an untrusted principal writes changes \emph{which} authenticated facts are selected while the cited evidence stays fully authenticated; faithful information-flow control (IFC), checking the provenance of what the reader uses (all of it authenticated), makes the byte-identical decision to no defense at all, across document-QA substrates and real multi-session agent memory. In the most consequential instance, a no-source structural write silently misdirects $28$ irreversible ledger transfers over $499$ live actions: faithful IFC permits every one, and \authselect\ prevents every one. We then characterize exactly which memories are exposed: a selector admits the channel when its structural term can reallocate an $\Omega(1)$ share of top-$k$ membership past a selected fact's margin. Personalized PageRank can, since a sourceless write reroutes conserved random-walk mass; a content-fixed reranker cannot, and Graphiti's node-distance, which leans on structure \emph{more} than PageRank does, stays immune. Reallocatability, not reliance, is the predictor. We prove the immune case in general and the open case under a chokepoint condition we verify. Closing the channel forces any provenance defense to recompute selection on the authenticated subgraph, which is what \authselect\ does, at zero over-block and $2$--$3\%$ latency.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

CLIF: Cross-layer LEO-ISL Fingerprinting for Physical and Network Attack Detection in Dense LEO Constellations

Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) mega-constellations such as Starlink by SpaceX and Kuiper by Amazon rely on optical Inter-Satellite Links (ISLs) for autonomous mesh routing to provide low-latency telecommunication, Internet of Things (IoT), and security services globally. As commercial operators and governments deploy increasingly dense constellations and form multi-operator peering coalitions, ISL integrity becomes critical to both commercial availability and national security. However, there is a lack of real-world data for LEO constellations and existing real-time security approaches focus strictly on physical layer security, leaving blind spots in the coverage of network-layer and composite attacks. In this paper, we present a cross-layer, lightweight behavioral fingerprinting framework that fuses onboard physical-layer measurements with network-layer data to detect anomalies at low computational overhead. We construct an orbital simulation covering the first shells of Starlink (1,584 satellites), Kuiper (1,156 satellites), and a joint multi-operator peering scenario (2,740 satellites), injecting ten attack types that span spoofing, traffic manipulation, and routing subversion at varying severity. We evaluate three unsupervised, per-satellite detectors among which our Mahalanobis-distance-based detector achieves 99.5% recall on Starlink, 99.4% on Kuiper, and 94.8\% on the multi-operator constellation, while maintaining False Positive Rates (FPR) below 0.7%. Our results demonstrate that cross-layer feature fusion is not only necessary for comprehensive security of LEO constellations but highly cost-effective for large-scale networks while fitting into the strict onboard energy budgets of resource-constrained satellites.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

PEANUT: Perturbations by Eigenvector Alignment for Attacking Graph Neural Networks Under Topology-Driven Message Passing

Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) have achieved strong performance on tasks involving relational data. However, small perturbations to graph structure can significantly alter their outputs, raising concerns about their robustness in real-world deployment in security critical environments. In this work, we study a core vulnerability in MPNNs that explicitly consume graph topology via the adjacency matrix or Laplacian as part of their message passing mechanism. We show that this design choice exposes an extremely vulnerable attack surface, with significant effects even under minimal perturbation. Building on this observation, we propose PEA, a simple, gradient-free, black-box injection attack that requires only a single query to the target model, capitalizing on this vulnerability by constructing a perturbation aligned with a specific significant eigenvector to induce large output deviations. Unlike graph modification attacks, PEA operates under the realistic assumption that adversaries cannot alter the original graph and are limited to injecting new nodes at inference time. PEA requires no iterative optimization, parameter learning, or surrogate models---which require additional training and remain susceptible to differences in model priors and generalization capabilities---thereby avoiding significant computational overhead and the associated transferability challenges. We evaluate PEA on popular benchmark datasets across three graph learning tasks, showing consistent performance degradation under realistic attack constraints despite its simplicity. Our results reveal a fundamental security weakness in topology-driven message passing architectures and urge an implementation shift, as the worst effects of such attacks can be substantially mitigated through appropriate input filtering.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

LiteAtt: A Peer-to-Peer Self-Attestation Framework and Handshake Protocol for Connected IoT Devices

As the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes an integral part of critical infrastructure and commercial services, runtime firmware attestation of constituent Micro-Controllers (MCUs) has become instrumental in maintaining security and trust. Most prior works assume computational limitations on the MCUs and rely on a remote verifier to perform complex computation. This introduces a centralized point of failure, round-trip latency, and the burden of maintaining golden reference states at the recipient, even in recent Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and Self-Attestation (SA) schemes. This is avoidable for modern MCUs such as Arm Cortex-M, which, although battery-operated, feature security and intelligence capabilities, including Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) and embedded Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) inference. Leveraging such provisions, this paper presents LiteAtt, a verifier-less, P2P-SA framework and protocol for modern IoT MCUs that folds directly into the connection handshake between IoT MCUs. Each MCU runs quantized TinyML Autoencoders (TinyAE) within its TEE to evaluate the runtime SRAM state. SA verdicts are securely bound to the handshake transcript context, enabling stateless verification at the peer node. The proposed protocol yields mutually authenticated and firmware-attested communication without traditional latency and reference distribution overheads. We report an average accuracy of 99.42%, F1 score of 99.70%, TPR of 99.45%, and TNR of 95.14% on SRAM attestation datasets, an optimized per-handshake latency, energy consumption, and peak memory footprint of 26.3-294.9ms, 2.65-9.35mJ, and 4.91KB, respectively, across three Arm Cortex-M boards, and evaluate the models on simulated runtime attacks, random perturbation, and adversarial ML.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Quantifying Memory Cells Vulnerability for DRAM Security

Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) is pervasive in computer systems. Cell vulnerabilities caused by unintended phenomena (forced retention failure, latency alteration, rowhammer and rowpress) lead to unintended bit flips in memory. These phenomena have been explored as attacks to violate data integrity and confidentiality during normal operation, but also exploited as a benefit in security systems as a method to generate random secret keys and unique device fingerprints (e.g. Physically Unclonable Functions). In both cases, attackers may wish to exploit knowledge of individual cell flip vulnerability to predict the current/future data contents of a set of cells, which can be utilised to break security systems. In this work, we develop a quantitative, cell-level circuit framework that models DRAM vulnerability directly from its physical charge leakage and disturbance pathways. By linking these device-layer behaviours to system-level security properties, our framework enables systematic evaluation of DRAM with respect to volatility (retention), integrity (disturbance-induced modification), and confidentiality (pattern-dependent leakage). We further demonstrate how the framework can be applied to well-known failure modes, revealing non-uniform and context-dependent vulnerability patterns. This work provides both theoretical foundations and practical evaluation tools for evaluating the suitability of DRAM use within security applications.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Knowledge-driven Reasoning for Mobile Agentic AI: Concepts, Approaches, and Directions

Mobile agentic AI is extending autonomous capabilities to resource-constrained platforms such as edge robots and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), where strict size, weight, power, and cost (SWAP-C) constraints and intermittent wireless connectivity limit both on-device computation and cloud access. Existing approaches mostly optimize per-round communication efficiency, yet mobile agents must sustain competence across a stream of tasks. We propose a knowledge-driven reasoning framework that extracts reusable decision structures from past execution, synchronizes them over bandwidth-limited links, and injects them into on-device reasoning to reduce latency, energy, and error accumulation. A DIKW-inspired taxonomy distinguishes raw observations, episode-scoped traces, and persistent cross-task knowledge, and categorizes knowledge into retrieval, structured, procedural, and parametric representations, each with a distinct tradeoff between reasoning speedup and failure risk. A key finding is that knowledge exposure is non-monotonic: too little forces costly trial-and-error replanning, while too much introduces conflicting cues and errors. A UAV case study validates the framework, where a compact knowledge pack synchronized over intermittent backhaul enables a 3B-parameter onboard model to achieve perfect mission reliability with lower reasoning cost than both knowledge-free on-device reasoning and cloud-centric replanning.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Fed-GAME: Personalized Federated Learning with Graph Attention Mixture-of-Experts For Time-Series Forecasting

Federated learning (FL) on graphs shows promise for distributed time-series forecasting. Yet, existing methods rely on static topologies and struggle with client heterogeneity. We propose Fed-GAME, a framework that models personalized aggregation as message passing over a learnable dynamic implicit graph. The core is a decoupled parameter difference-based update protocol, where clients transmit parameter differences between their fine-tuned private model and a shared global model. On the server, these differences are decomposed into two streams: (1) averaged difference used to updating the global model for consensus (2) the selective difference fed into a novel Graph Attention Mixture-of-Experts (GAME) aggregator for fine-grained personalization. In this aggregator, shared experts provide scoring signals while personalized gates adaptively weight selective updates to support personalized aggregation. Experiments on two real-world electric vehicle charging datasets demonstrate that Fed-GAME outperforms state-of-the-art personalized FL baselines.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Baiting AI: Deceptive Adversary Against AI-Protected Industrial Infrastructures

This paper explores a new cyber-attack vector targeting Industrial Control Systems (ICS), particularly focusing on water treatment facilities. Developing a new multi-agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approach, adversaries craft stealthy, strategically timed, wear-out attacks designed to subtly degrade product quality and reduce the lifespan of field actuators. This sophisticated method leverages DRL methodology not only to execute precise and detrimental impacts on targeted infrastructure but also to evade detection by contemporary AI-driven defence systems. By developing and implementing tailored policies, the attackers ensure their hostile actions blend seamlessly with normal operational patterns, circumventing integrated security measures. Our research reveals the robustness of this attack strategy, shedding light on the potential for DRL models to be manipulated for adversarial purposes. Our research has been validated through testing and analysis in an industry-level setup. For reproducibility and further study, all related materials, including datasets and documentation, are publicly accessible.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Unified Framework for Qualifying Security Boundary of PUFs Against Machine Learning Attacks

Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) serve as lightweight, hardware-intrinsic entropy sources widely deployed in IoT security applications. However, delay-based PUFs are vulnerable to Machine Learning Attacks (MLAs), undermining their assumed unclonability. There are no valid metrics for evaluating PUF MLA resistance, but empirical modelling experiments, which lack theoretical guarantees and are highly sensitive to advances in machine learning techniques. To address the fundamental gap between PUF designs and security qualifications, this work proposes a novel, formal, and unified framework for evaluating PUF security against modelling attacks by providing security lower bounds, independent of specific attack models or learning algorithms. We mathematically characterise the adversary's advantage in predicting responses to unseen challenges based solely on observed challenge-response pairs (CRPs), formulating the problem as a conditional probability estimation over the space of candidate PUFs. We present our analysis on previous "broken" PUFs, e.g., Arbiter PUFs, XOR PUFs, Feed-Forward PUFs, and for the first time compare their MLA resistance in a formal way. In addition, we evaluate the currently "secure" CT PUF, and show its security boundary. We demonstrate that the proposed approach systematically quantifies PUF resilience, captures subtle security differences, and provides actionable, theoretically grounded security guarantees for the practical deployment of PUFs.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Towards Irreversible Machine Unlearning for Diffusion Models

Diffusion models are renowned for their state-of-the-art performance in generating synthetic images. However, concerns related to safety, privacy, and copyright highlight the need for machine unlearning, which can make diffusion models forget specific training data and prevent the generation of sensitive or unwanted content. Current machine unlearning methods for diffusion models are primarily designed for conditional diffusion models and focus on unlearning specific data classes or features. Among these methods, finetuning-based machine unlearning methods are recognized for their efficiency and effectiveness, which update the parameters of pre-trained diffusion models by minimizing carefully designed loss functions. However, in this paper, we propose a novel attack named Diffusion Model Relearning Attack (DiMRA), which can reverse the finetuning-based machine unlearning methods, posing a significant vulnerability of this kind of technique. Without prior knowledge of the unlearning elements, DiMRA optimizes the unlearned diffusion model on an auxiliary dataset to reverse the unlearning, enabling the model to regenerate previously unlearned elements. To mitigate this vulnerability, we propose a novel machine unlearning method for diffusion models, termed as Diffusion Model Unlearning by Memorization (DiMUM). Unlike traditional methods that focus on forgetting, DiMUM memorizes alternative data or features to replace targeted unlearning data or features in order to prevent generating such elements. In our experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of DiMRA in reversing state-of-the-art finetuning-based machine unlearning methods for diffusion models, highlighting the need for more robust solutions. We extensively evaluate DiMUM, demonstrating its superior ability to preserve the generative performance of diffusion models while enhancing robustness against DiMRA.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models for Tabular Data Generation-in One Day

Tabular instruction tuning has emerged as a promising research direction for improving LLMs understanding of tabular data. However, the majority of existing works only consider question-answering and reasoning tasks over tabular data, leaving tabular data generation largely unnoticed. In this work, for the first time, we explore the efficacy of instruction tuning in improving LLMs tabular data generation capabilities. More specifically, given the high data and computation requirements of tabular instruction tuning, we aim to address the possibility of instruction tuning for tabular data generation with limited data and computational resources. To achieve this, we first create a high-quality instruction dataset for tabular data, enabling efficient LLM comprehension. We then instruction-tune an open-source LLM (Llama3.1-8B-Instruct) on the training set of this dataset to improve its tabular data generation performance. Our experimental results show that by using our high-quality dataset and instruction-tuning on only 7K instructions with an A100 GPU, for less than 6 hours, we achieve tabular data generation performance on par with the most capable commercial LLM, GPT-4o.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity

Emojis are globally used non-verbal cues in digital communication, and extensive research has examined how large language models (LLMs) understand and utilize emojis across contexts. While usually associated with friendliness or playfulness, it is observed that emojis may trigger toxic content generation in LLMs. Motivated by such a observation, we aim to investigate: (1) whether emojis can clearly enhance the toxicity generation in LLMs and (2) how to interpret this phenomenon. We begin with a comprehensive exploration of emoji-triggered LLM toxicity generation by automating the construction of prompts with emojis to subtly express toxic intent. Experiments across 5 mainstream languages on 7 famous LLMs along with jailbreak tasks demonstrate that prompts with emojis could easily induce toxicity generation. To understand this phenomenon, we conduct model-level interpretations spanning semantic cognition, sequence generation and tokenization, suggesting that emojis can act as a heterogeneous semantic channel to bypass the safety mechanisms. To pursue deeper insights, we further probe the pre-training corpus and uncover potential correlation between the emoji-related data polution with the toxicity generation behaviors. Supplementary materials provide our implementation code and data. (Warning: This paper contains potentially sensitive contents)

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

CyGATE: Game-Theoretic Cyber Attack-Defense Engine for Patch Strategy Optimization

Modern cyber attacks unfold through multiple stages, requiring defenders to dynamically prioritize mitigations under uncertainty. While game-theoretic models capture attacker-defender interactions, existing approaches often rely on static assumptions and lack integration with real-time threat intelligence, limiting their adaptability. This paper presents CyGATE, a game-theoretic framework modeling attacker-defender interactions, using large language models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to enhance tactic selection and patch prioritization. Applied to a two-agent scenario, CyGATE frames cyber conflicts as a partially observable stochastic game (POSG) across Cyber Kill Chain stages. Both agents use belief states to navigate uncertainty, with the attacker adapting tactics and the defender re-prioritizing patches based on evolving risks and observed adversary behavior. The framework's flexible architecture enables extension to multi-agent scenarios involving coordinated attackers, collaborative defenders, or complex enterprise environments with multiple stakeholders. Evaluated in a dynamic patch scheduling scenario, CyGATE effectively prioritizes high-risk vulnerabilities, enhancing adaptability through dynamic threat integration, strategic foresight by anticipating attacker moves under uncertainty, and efficiency by optimizing resource use.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

VulCPE: Context-Aware Cybersecurity Vulnerability Retrieval and Management

The dynamic landscape of cybersecurity demands precise and scalable solutions for vulnerability management in heterogeneous systems, where configuration-specific vulnerabilities are often misidentified due to inconsistent data in databases like the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Inaccurate Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) data in NVD further leads to false positives and incomplete vulnerability retrieval. Informed by our systematic analysis of CPE and CVEdeails data, revealing more than 50% vendor name inconsistencies, we propose VulCPE, a framework that standardizes data and models configuration dependencies using a unified CPE schema (uCPE), entity recognition, relation extraction, and graph-based modeling. VulCPE achieves superior retrieval precision (0.766) and coverage (0.926) over existing tools. VulCPE ensures precise, context-aware vulnerability management, enhancing cyber resilience.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

A Survey on Vulnerability Prioritization: Taxonomy, Metrics, and Research Challenges

In the highly interconnected digital landscape of today, safeguarding complex infrastructures against cyber threats has become increasingly challenging due to the exponential growth in the number and complexity of vulnerabilities. Resource constraints necessitate effective vulnerability prioritization strategies, focusing efforts on the most critical risks. This paper presents a systematic literature review of 82 studies, introducing a novel taxonomy that categorizes metrics into severity, exploitability, contextual factors, predictive indicators, and aggregation methods. Our analysis reveals significant gaps in existing approaches and challenges with multi-domain applicability. By emphasizing the need for dynamic, context-aware metrics and scalable solutions, we provide actionable insights to bridge the gap between research and real-world applications. This work contributes to the field by offering a comprehensive framework for evaluating vulnerability prioritization methodologies and setting a research agenda to advance the state of practice.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

VulRG: Multi-Level Explainable Vulnerability Patch Ranking for Complex Systems Using Graphs

As interconnected systems proliferate, safeguarding complex infrastructures against an escalating array of cyber threats has become an urgent challenge. The increasing number of vulnerabilities, combined with resource constraints, makes addressing every vulnerability impractical, making effective prioritization essential. However, existing risk prioritization methods often rely on expert judgment or focus solely on exploit likelihood and consequences, lacking the granularity and adaptability needed for complex systems. This work introduces a graph-based framework for vulnerability patch prioritization that optimizes security by integrating diverse data sources and metrics into a universally applicable model. Refined risk metrics enable detailed assessments at the component, asset, and system levels. The framework employs two key graphs: a network communication graph to model potential attack paths and identify the shortest routes to critical assets, and a system dependency graph to capture risk propagation from exploited vulnerabilities across interconnected components. Asset criticality and component dependency rules systematically assess and mitigate risks. Benchmarking against state-of-the-art methods demonstrates superior accuracy in vulnerability patch ranking, with enhanced explainability. This framework advances vulnerability management and sets the stage for future research in adaptive cybersecurity strategies.

cs.CR↗