LiteAtt: A Peer-to-Peer Self-Attestation Framework and Handshake Protocol for Connected IoT Devices

Varun Kohli; Biplab Sikdar

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.19727

LiteAtt: A Peer-to-Peer Self-Attestation Framework and Handshake Protocol for Connected IoT Devices

Varun Kohli·Biplab Sikdar

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes an integral part of critical infrastructure and commercial services, runtime firmware attestation of constituent Micro-Controllers (MCUs) has become instrumental in maintaining security and trust. Most prior works assume computational limitations on the MCUs and rely on a remote verifier to perform complex computation. This introduces a centralized point of failure, round-trip latency, and the burden of maintaining golden reference states at the recipient, even in recent Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and Self-Attestation (SA) schemes. This is avoidable for modern MCUs such as Arm Cortex-M, which, although battery-operated, feature security and intelligence capabilities, including Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) and embedded Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) inference. Leveraging such provisions, this paper presents LiteAtt, a verifier-less, P2P-SA framework and protocol for modern IoT MCUs that folds directly into the connection handshake between IoT MCUs. Each MCU runs quantized TinyML Autoencoders (TinyAE) within its TEE to evaluate the runtime SRAM state. SA verdicts are securely bound to the handshake transcript context, enabling stateless verification at the peer node. The proposed protocol yields mutually authenticated and firmware-attested communication without traditional latency and reference distribution overheads. We report an average accuracy of 99.42%, F1 score of 99.70%, TPR of 99.45%, and TNR of 95.14% on SRAM attestation datasets, an optimized per-handshake latency, energy consumption, and peak memory footprint of 26.3-294.9ms, 2.65-9.35mJ, and 4.91KB, respectively, across three Arm Cortex-M boards, and evaluate the models on simulated runtime attacks, random perturbation, and adversarial ML.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Varun Kohli, Biplab Sikdar. 2026-03-20. LiteAtt: A Peer-to-Peer Self-Attestation Framework and Handshake Protocol for Connected IoT Devices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19727

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗