arXiv subjects

Ajinkya Gaikwad

Publications and source records attributed to Ajinkya Gaikwad.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Kernelization of 2-Club Cluster Edge Deletion on Interval Graphs

The \emph{$s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion} problem asks whether, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, one can delete at most $k$ edges so that every remaining connected component has diameter at most~$s$. This generalizes the classical \emph{Cluster Edge Deletion} problem by permitting components of bounded diameter instead of requiring cliques. On general graphs, $2$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion is known to be fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $k$, but it remains open whether it admits a polynomial kernel, as posed in~\cite{ABUKHZAM2023113864}. Motivated by this question, we study the problem on interval graphs and obtain a polynomial vertex kernel of size $\mathcal{O}(k^{5})$. As a complementary result, we also show that the \emph{$s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion} problem is polynomial time solvable on unit interval graphs. We also show that $2$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion is NP-hard even on split graphs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

On the Parameterized Complexity of $s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion

We study the parameterized and kernelization complexity of the \emph{\textsc{$s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion}} problem, a distance-bounded generalization of \emph{\textsc{Cluster Edge Deletion}}. Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and integers $k,s$, the goal is to delete at most $k$ edges so that every resulting connected component has diameter at most $s$. On the structural side, we settle an open question of Montecchiani, Ortali, Piselli, and Tappini (\emph{Theoretical Computer Science}, 2023) by proving W[1]-hardness parameterized by pathwidth plus the maximum number of allowed $s$-clubs, and consequently by treewidth plus this parameter. Thus, the diameter bound $s$ is inecessary for tractability under these parameters. In contrast, we show that dependence on $s$ is unnecessary for several structural parameters: the problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by treedepth, neighborhood diversity, or cluster vertex deletion number, generalizing known results for $s=1.$ We further prove that no polynomial kernel exists when parameterized by vertex cover, even for $s=2$. On the positive side, we present an FPT bicriteria approximation scheme for graphs excluding long induced cycles, running in time $f(k,1/ε)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ and producing a solution of size at most $k$ whose components have diameter at most $(1+ε)s$. Finally, we initiate the study of the directed variant, \textsc{$s$-Club Cluster Arc Deletion}, and prove that it is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k$, even on directed acyclic graphs.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

Parameterized Complexity of Edge-Constrained Graph Partitioning

We study the Edge-Constrained Graph Partitioning Problem (ECGP), which asks whether the vertices of a graph can be partitioned into r parts, each inducing at least gamma edges. We also consider a balanced variant (BECGP), requiring equal-sized parts, and signed variants, where the utility of a part is the difference between its numbers of positive and negative edges. We show that ECGP and BECGP remain NP-hard for fixed gamma, while BECGP is also NP-hard for fixed r. For the natural parameterization r+gamma, both problems admit polynomial kernels. We obtain FPT algorithms for ECGP and BECGP parameterized by maximum leaf number, vertex deletion distance to a clique, cluster vertex deletion number plus gamma, and vertex integrity. Furthermore, ECGP is FPT parameterized by vertex deletion distance to stars plus gamma and vertex deletion distance to paths plus gamma. On the negative side, ECGP and BECGP are W[1]-hard when parameterized by r together with several structural parameters. In particular, hardness holds for feedback edge set, vertex deletion distance to stars or paths, and modular width even when the corresponding parameter is zero. The problems are also W[1]-hard parameterized by cluster vertex deletion number plus r, and by clique-width even when gamma=3. For signed graphs, both variants are NP-hard even when r+gamma=3 and the input is a disjoint union of two cliques. Finally, the balanced signed variant is W[1]-hard parameterized by treedepth plus r, even when gamma=0.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Parameterized Complexity of Connected Network Microaggregation: The Role of Cluster Size

Network microaggregation is a fundamental technique in statistical disclosure control, where vertices of a graph are partitioned into clusters satisfying size constraints and admitting a center within bounded distance. We study the parameterized complexity of the \emph{unweighted Connected Network Microaggregation} problem, focusing on structural parameters and natural clustering parameters such as the distance bound $d$ and cluster size gap $u-\ell$. We show that, unlike the weighted variant, the unweighted connected problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by neighborhood diversity, and hence by vertex cover. In contrast, it remains $\mathrm{W[1]}$-hard for more general structural parameters, including vertex deletion to paths, stars, and cliques. These hardness results hold even for every $d\ge 2$ and any fixed gap $u-\ell$, showing that these clustering parameters do not overcome the structural hardness. We further show that adding the cluster size bound $u$ restores tractability for structural parameters such as treewidth and cluster vertex deletion. Moreover, $u$ is essential: the problem remains $\mathrm{W[1]}$-hard when these structural parameters are considered alone. For kernelization, we prove that the problem has no polynomial kernel parameterized by vertex cover unless $\mathrm{coNP}\subseteq\mathrm{NP/poly}$, even when the distance constraint is vacuous. Adding $u$ yields a polynomial kernel for vertex cover, while kernelization remains unlikely for more general structural parameters even when combined with $u$. Finally, we show that the problem is NP-hard on graphs of bounded clique-width.

cs.DS↗