arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2510.07065

On the Parameterized Complexity of $s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion

Abstract

We study the parameterized and kernelization complexity of the \emph{\textsc{$s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion}} problem, a distance-bounded generalization of \emph{\textsc{Cluster Edge Deletion}}. Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and integers $k,s$, the goal is to delete at most $k$ edges so that every resulting connected component has diameter at most $s$. On the structural side, we settle an open question of Montecchiani, Ortali, Piselli, and Tappini (\emph{Theoretical Computer Science}, 2023) by proving W[1]-hardness parameterized by pathwidth plus the maximum number of allowed $s$-clubs, and consequently by treewidth plus this parameter. Thus, the diameter bound $s$ is inecessary for tractability under these parameters. In contrast, we show that dependence on \(s\) is unnecessary for several structural parameters: the problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by treedepth, neighborhood diversity, or cluster vertex deletion number, generalizing known results for $s=1.$ We further prove that no polynomial kernel exists when parameterized by vertex cover, even for $s=2$. On the positive side, we present an FPT bicriteria approximation scheme for graphs excluding long induced cycles, running in time $f(k,1/ε)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ and producing a solution of size at most $k$ whose components have diameter at most $(1+ε)s$. Finally, we initiate the study of the directed variant, \textsc{$s$-Club Cluster Arc Deletion}, and prove that it is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k$, even on directed acyclic graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ajinkya Gaikwad. 2026-08-30. On the Parameterized Complexity of $s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07065

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Minimum-Weight Mixed Dominating Set on Threshold Graphs

We study the minimum-weight mixed dominating set problem on threshold graphs. In this problem, vertices and edges have weights, and the goal is to find a mixed set of minimum total weight that dominates every vertex and edge of the graph. We first show that arbitrary weights can be reduced to non-negative weights without changing the asymptotic running time. By adapting a reduction to the minimum-weight edge cover given in Ferrarini, Kober, Lancini, and Yuditsky, we obtain an $\mathcal{O}(n^5)$-time algorithm for the minimum weight mixed dominating set problem on threshold graphs.

cs.DS

An Exposition of the $\widetilde{O}(\log^{1/4} n)$ Bound for the Komlós Problem

A conjecture of Komlós states that the combinatorial discrepancy of any matrix $A\in\mathbb R^{m\times n}$ whose columns have Euclidean norm at most one is bounded by a universal constant. We prove that the combinatorial discrepancy of every such matrix is at most $O((\log n)^{1/4}(\log\log n)^{7/4})$. This is the first asymptotic improvement over the $O(\sqrt{\log n})$ bound established by Banaszczyk [Banaszczyk, Random Struct.\ Algorithms, 1998], and it refutes a conjecture of Hajela [Hajela, European J.\ Combin., 1988] that a lower bound of order $Ω(\sqrt{\log n})$ should hold.

math.CO

A Simplified Analysis of the Good-Bad $3/2$-Approximation Algorithm for Some Minimum-Cost Graph Problems

In this paper, we consider an easy greedy approximation algorithm, the good-bad algorithm, introduced by Couëtoux for finding a minimum-cost set of edges such that every connected component has at least $k$ vertices. Couëtoux proves that the good-bad algorithm achieves a $3/2$-approximation for this problem. Davis and Williamson extend this result to the more general problem of finding a minimum-cost edge set that contains at least one edge from every cut $S\subseteq V$ satisfying $h(S) = 1$ where $h:2^V \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ is downward monotone; that is, $h(S) = 1$ implies $h(T) = 1$ for every nonempty subset $T \subseteq S$. The original problem corresponds to $h(S) =1$ when $|S|<k$. We give a simplified analysis of the good-bad algorithm for downward monotone functions.

cs.DS