arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.02290

Monotonicity and bounded variation for harmonic mappings with applications to special functions

Abstract

We investigate sufficient conditions for the close-to-convexity and univalence of planar harmonic mappings. First, we establish a unified monotonicity criterion for harmonic mappings that incorporates the ordinary and odd harmonic cases. We then develop a criterion based on the total variation of successive coefficient differences. Unlike conventional monotonicity conditions, this approach allows the coefficient sequences to exhibit non-monotone behavior. Several previously established criteria for harmonic close-to-convexity are recovered as particular consequences. Applications are developed for harmonic mappings associated with Gaussian hypergeometric functions and Legendre polynomials, with explicit restrictions on their parameters.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jugal Kishore Prajapat. 2026-11-01. Monotonicity and bounded variation for harmonic mappings with applications to special functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02290

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Different approach to certain problems in univalent function theory

Using different approach we consider some problems for the class $\mathcal{S}_{ex}^{\star}$ defined by the condition $\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\prec e^{αz}$, $0<α\leq1.$ Our method is more simple than that used by Das and Sarkar in their work: \textit{Sharp coefficient estimates for the exponential starlike class $S^\star_{ex}$} (\cite{DS26}).

math.CV↗

Local convexity obstructions for bounded realizations of Teichmüller space

Let $D\subset\mathbb{C}^n$, $n\ge2$, be a bounded domain that is biholomorphic to a finite-dimensional Teichmüller space. We prove that $\partial D$ has no locally convex boundary patch containing a complex $(n-1)$-dimensional manifold through each of its points. Note that in complex dimension two this excludes every locally convex boundary point, without any boundary regularity assumption. In every dimension, we also exclude locally convex $C^2$ boundary patches.

math.CV↗