arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.36345

Bayesian Replicator Dynamics and the Inversion of Strict Dominance in Bimatrix Games

Jaime Ruiz-Serra·Nihat Ay·Michael Harré
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Replicator dynamics, the central model of evolutionary game theory, describe populations evolving under selection and agents learning by trial and error. They also admit a third use: continuous-time Bayesian inference, in which an agent planning against an opponent accumulates evidence for each candidate strategy. Here we show that this use divides all two-player games into two classes. With the standard expected-utility payoff, the dynamics can be expressed as Bayesian updating only in games (with any number of actions) where no player has a dominant strategy. The logarithmic payoff of Ay and Erb admits the Bayesian representation in every game. Coordination, anti-coordination, and cyclic games share qualitative dynamics under both payoff definitions, with equilibria displaced and selection thresholds shifted. In contrast, the flows of every game with a dominant strategy are reversed between the payoff definitions, with the strictly dominant strategy eliminated under logarithmic payoffs. Cooperation therefore emerges in the Prisoner's Dilemma, and games of common interest converge to mutual defection. For two-action games the classification is complete and rests on an exact Hamiltonian structure shared by both payoff definitions. The structure gives a behavioural test: cycles in the classic Matching Pennies game have amplitude-independent period (isochronous) under logarithmic payoffs, but not under expected utility. Logarithmic evidence integration thus determines which strategic outcomes dynamical selection can reach, wherever learning approximates Bayesian updating.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.MA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jaime Ruiz-Serra, Nihat Ay, Michael Harré. 2026-10-26. Bayesian Replicator Dynamics and the Inversion of Strict Dominance in Bimatrix Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36345

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Compliance Moral Hazard and the Backfiring Mandate

Competing firms that share a population of risky customers face a decentralized risk detection problem in which each firm holds fragmentary information whose aggregation would generate social value, but private incentives impede truthful sharing. We develop a dynamic mechanism design framework for this setting and identify three strategic frictions that distinguish it from classical mechanism design with decentralized information: compliance moral hazard, adversarial adaptation, and information destruction through intervention. A temporal value assignment (TVA) mechanism credits firms using a strictly proper scoring rule applied to discounted verified outcomes; under stated assumptions, TVA implements truthful posterior reporting as a Bayes--Nash equilibrium (uniquely optimal at each edge in large federations, with $O(1/m)$ shading in finite systems). A network Shapley characterization shows that under edge-additive coalition value, each firm's marginal contribution is proportional to its weighted cross-firm interaction degree, yielding a sharp prescription for coalition design that prioritizes inter-firm volume over firm size. Embedding TVA in a model of competition among firms, we establish a welfare ordering across four regulatory regimes (autarky, voluntary federation, mandated full sharing, TVA) and identify conditions under which information-sharing mandates without compatible incentive design reduce welfare below autarky: a ``backfiring mandate.'' We illustrate the framework on a 1.4M-transaction synthetic anti-money-laundering benchmark; the same machinery extends to platform fraud, cybersecurity threat intelligence, and supply chain risk detection.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Learning-Augmented Coordination Mechanisms

The inefficiency of decentralized resource allocation is classically measured by the Price of Anarchy (PoA) and the Price of Stability (PoS). The most widely studied and foundational class of these models are atomic and non-atomic congestion games, for which a robust theory quantifying the inefficiency of equilibria is well-established. To mitigate the effects of selfish behavior, we employ Coordination Mechanisms, which modify resource costs to incentivize socially improved equilibria. However, standard Coordination Mechanisms assume unknown, adversarial demand, restricting positive results mainly to specialized networks such as parallel links. We address this limitation by studying learning-augmented coordination mechanisms, where the mechanism is endowed with a potentially inaccurate prediction of the demand. We study general atomic and non-atomic congestion games with polynomial latency functions of degree $d$. Our main positive result is a learning-augmented coordination mechanism tuned by a confidence parameter $β$ which achieves a "best of both worlds" type of result: approximately optimal performance for an accurate prediction without sacrificing the worst-case guarantee of a good equilibrium (PoS). We further establish bounds on PoA-Robustness (worst equilibrium performance under cost modification). Our construction relies on transforming approximate equilibria of the original game into exact equilibria of the modified game using an approximate potential function. We complement our positive results with impossibility results. We first show that requiring all equilibria to have optimal social cost under an accurate prediction precludes bounded robustness. We also show a strong error tolerance limit in non-atomic games: even infinitesimal prediction errors can cause the performance of a mechanism with optimal consistency to revert to the original PoA.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Optimality and Impossibility in Multidimensional Strategyproof Facility Location

We study facility location in multidimensional normed spaces with the objective of minimizing social cost, the sum of agents' distances to their nearest facility. A deterministic mechanism selects $k$ facility locations based on the reports of $n$ agents and is strategyproof (SP) if no agent can reduce her distance by misreporting her location. We establish optimal approximation ratios and impossibility results. For a single facility in the Euclidean plane, we prove that the optimal approximation ratios among deterministic SP mechanisms are exactly those obtained by Goel and Hann-Caruthers [SCW 2023] for the coordinate-wise median (CM): $\frac{\sqrt{2(n^2+1)}}{n+1}$ for odd $n\ge3$ and $\sqrt{2}$ for even $n\ge4$. We remove the anonymity assumption from their optimality result. However, CM is not always optimal in non-Euclidean spaces: we give an SP mechanism that minimizes social cost exactly in $\ell_\infty^d$, whereas CM has a tight uniform approximation ratio of $2$ already in the plane. We then consider two facilities in $\ell_p$ spaces with $1 2$. In the plane, no deterministic SP mechanism has a finite approximation ratio. In higher dimensions, the same impossibility holds for anonymous deterministic SP mechanisms. Finally, a reduction using distant agents and a limiting argument extends both impossibility results to every $k>2$ with $n>k$.

cs.GT↗