arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.36613

Optimality and Impossibility in Multidimensional Strategyproof Facility Location

Abstract

We study facility location in multidimensional normed spaces with the objective of minimizing social cost, the sum of agents' distances to their nearest facility. A deterministic mechanism selects $k$ facility locations based on the reports of $n$ agents and is strategyproof (SP) if no agent can reduce her distance by misreporting her location. We establish optimal approximation ratios and impossibility results. For a single facility in the Euclidean plane, we prove that the optimal approximation ratios among deterministic SP mechanisms are exactly those obtained by Goel and Hann-Caruthers [SCW 2023] for the coordinate-wise median (CM): $\frac{\sqrt{2(n^2+1)}}{n+1}$ for odd $n\ge3$ and $\sqrt{2}$ for even $n\ge4$. We remove the anonymity assumption from their optimality result. However, CM is not always optimal in non-Euclidean spaces: we give an SP mechanism that minimizes social cost exactly in $\ell_\infty^d$, whereas CM has a tight uniform approximation ratio of $2$ already in the plane. We then consider two facilities in $\ell_p$ spaces with $1 2$. In the plane, no deterministic SP mechanism has a finite approximation ratio. In higher dimensions, the same impossibility holds for anonymous deterministic SP mechanisms. Finally, a reduction using distant agents and a limiting argument extends both impossibility results to every $k>2$ with $n>k$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jianan Lin. 2026-10-27. Optimality and Impossibility in Multidimensional Strategyproof Facility Location. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36613

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Compliance Moral Hazard and the Backfiring Mandate

Competing firms that share a population of risky customers face a decentralized risk detection problem in which each firm holds fragmentary information whose aggregation would generate social value, but private incentives impede truthful sharing. We develop a dynamic mechanism design framework for this setting and identify three strategic frictions that distinguish it from classical mechanism design with decentralized information: compliance moral hazard, adversarial adaptation, and information destruction through intervention. A temporal value assignment (TVA) mechanism credits firms using a strictly proper scoring rule applied to discounted verified outcomes; under stated assumptions, TVA implements truthful posterior reporting as a Bayes--Nash equilibrium (uniquely optimal at each edge in large federations, with $O(1/m)$ shading in finite systems). A network Shapley characterization shows that under edge-additive coalition value, each firm's marginal contribution is proportional to its weighted cross-firm interaction degree, yielding a sharp prescription for coalition design that prioritizes inter-firm volume over firm size. Embedding TVA in a model of competition among firms, we establish a welfare ordering across four regulatory regimes (autarky, voluntary federation, mandated full sharing, TVA) and identify conditions under which information-sharing mandates without compatible incentive design reduce welfare below autarky: a ``backfiring mandate.'' We illustrate the framework on a 1.4M-transaction synthetic anti-money-laundering benchmark; the same machinery extends to platform fraud, cybersecurity threat intelligence, and supply chain risk detection.

cs.GT↗

Learning-Augmented Coordination Mechanisms

The inefficiency of decentralized resource allocation is classically measured by the Price of Anarchy (PoA) and the Price of Stability (PoS). The most widely studied and foundational class of these models are atomic and non-atomic congestion games, for which a robust theory quantifying the inefficiency of equilibria is well-established. To mitigate the effects of selfish behavior, we employ Coordination Mechanisms, which modify resource costs to incentivize socially improved equilibria. However, standard Coordination Mechanisms assume unknown, adversarial demand, restricting positive results mainly to specialized networks such as parallel links. We address this limitation by studying learning-augmented coordination mechanisms, where the mechanism is endowed with a potentially inaccurate prediction of the demand. We study general atomic and non-atomic congestion games with polynomial latency functions of degree $d$. Our main positive result is a learning-augmented coordination mechanism tuned by a confidence parameter $β$ which achieves a "best of both worlds" type of result: approximately optimal performance for an accurate prediction without sacrificing the worst-case guarantee of a good equilibrium (PoS). We further establish bounds on PoA-Robustness (worst equilibrium performance under cost modification). Our construction relies on transforming approximate equilibria of the original game into exact equilibria of the modified game using an approximate potential function. We complement our positive results with impossibility results. We first show that requiring all equilibria to have optimal social cost under an accurate prediction precludes bounded robustness. We also show a strong error tolerance limit in non-atomic games: even infinitesimal prediction errors can cause the performance of a mechanism with optimal consistency to revert to the original PoA.

cs.GT↗

Noise Shapes the Surplus: Strategic Play Against No-Regret Learners

Recent work has shown that, in zero-sum games, an optimizer can extract $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ strategic surplus---cumulative payoff above the minimax benchmark---against noiseless no-regret learners with a constant step size. However, in practice, learners often act on perturbed payoff scores and use decaying learning rates $η_t$. Since existing extraction mechanisms rely on exact scores, a natural question is whether noise shields the learner from exploitation and eliminates surplus altogether. We address this question for the widely used class of Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) algorithms. Under standard regularity conditions, we establish three results, none of which assumes independence of the noise. First, under summability conditions, passive play of a strategy fixed independently of the horizon earns at most constant surplus. Second, we design a new mechanism that exploits the learner's noise-dependent response: a clairvoyant optimizer who knows the update rule and the limiting mean response secures $Ω(1/η_T)$ surplus whenever that mean is profitable. Third, even when that mean is not profitable, active alternating play extracts $Ω(\sum_{t<T}η_t)$ surplus by exploiting the learner's movement rather than its location, under suitable responsiveness and stability conditions. Finally, at the canonical learning rate $η_t\propto t^{-1/2}$, we recover the noiseless $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ rate for mean-zero, finite-variance perturbations---whether fresh with arbitrary temporal dependence or accumulated from i.i.d. increments---provided the limiting mean response is profitable.

cs.GT↗