arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.35647

TRON: Transferring Naturally Evolved Network Architectures into Neuroevolution

Abstract

Neural architecture search (NAS) is challenging because of the vast, non-linear space of artificial neural network (ANN) topologies. Evolutionary methods can generate architectures, but their effectiveness is limited by difficulties in preserving functional organization during mutation and recombination. Naturally evolved biological networks may provide organizational principles that support adaptation and evolvability. Here, we introduce TRON (TRansfer Of Natural networks), a neuroevolution framework that uses experimentally characterized protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks as architectural priors. Instead of starting from random topologies, TRON reuses biological interaction patterns as structural building blocks. It combines classical evolutionary operators with neuroevolution-inspired mechanisms, including speciation, and introduces species quarantine to protect newly generated architectures during early maturation. We evaluated TRON against established evolutionary and neuroevolutionary methods on three classification benchmarks (CORA, CITESEER, and PUBMED) and three regression benchmarks (DIABETES, FRIEDMAN, and CALIFORNIA). TRON achieved the highest predictive performance among the evaluated methods on all classification datasets and most regression tasks. It showed substantially lower variability across independent runs, indicating greater robustness and convergence stability, at increased computational cost. These findings support the use of PPI networks as effective architectural priors and suggest that biologically derived interaction networks provide more favorable substrates for neuroevolution than random topologies. More broadly, TRON demonstrates the feasibility of transferring naturally evolved network architectures into artificial intelligence systems, offering a direction for improving evolvability in NAS through the reuse of biological organizational principles.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Konstantinos Zacharopoulos, Alexandra Bekou, Jose M Serradell, Foteini Paraskevopoulou, Apostolos Fournaris, Ioannis Arapakis, Oscar Lao. 2026-10-26. TRON: Transferring Naturally Evolved Network Architectures into Neuroevolution. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35647

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Reconstruction differences rival individual differences in the fly compass connectome and break trained circuit models

Neural network models are increasingly constructed from synapse-resolution connectomes, and the same circuit is now available in reconstructions from other animals and pipelines. We do not know whether such models are dependent on the reconstruction they are built from, and whether connectome differences are biological or measurement errors. We studied the Drosophila head-direction circuit in nine versions: four flies (male CNS, hemibrain, FlyWire, BANC) and five variants of the same fly varying only by thresholds, proofreading or synapse detection. Using wiring-based correspondences validated by anatomical labels, we place all differences on one scale. A change of synapse detection within one fly changed the circuit more than halfway to the smallest between-fly difference on four distance measures; proofreading differences were smaller but depended on the metric, and left and right halves of one fly differed no more than random halves. Networks trained on each wiring to hold a cued heading developed near-perfect ring attractors, but their error increased from below 1 degree to 10-28 degrees when all weights changed by 1%. Training on each wiring did not transfer to any other connectome, including other versions of the same fly; refitting thirty cell-type gains, we repaired filtering-level differences but remaining error depended on wiring distance. Training with noise lowered precision and gave only partial transfer. In imaging data, the fly compass drifted gradually in darkness. Connectome-constrained models should report the reconstruction they were built on and be tested for robustness across reconstructions.

cs.NE↗

A Dynamic Decomposition Strategy for the MOEA/D With Proven Performance Guarantees

The MOEA/D is one of the most successful multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. It operates by decomposing the optimization problem into single-objective subproblems, which are then solved in a co-evolutionary manner. The performance of the MOEA/D depends critically on this decomposition. In this work, we propose a novel way to adjust this decomposition on the fly, for the case of discrete bi-objective optimization. Different from all previous works in this direction, we support our new algorithm with a proven performance guarantee. This is the first work that rigorously proves the runtime of a dynamic multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. For monotonic distortions of the simple LOTZ benchmark, it is known that classic decompositions leave large holes in the Pareto front, making it very hard for the MOEA/D to cover the entire Pareto front. In contrast, we prove that our self-adjusting MOEA/D solves all these LOTZ problems in an expected number of $O(n^4)$ function evaluations. This relatively low runtime as well as the details of our mathematical proof show that the dynamic decomposition strategy indeed evolves a decomposition adjusted to each of these problem instances.

cs.NE↗

Understanding the Co-evolutionary Solution Exchange of the MOEA/D: Already the Smallest Communication Radius Gives the Best-Possible Speed-Up

Besides domination-based algorithms such as the NSGA-II, the decomposition-based MOEA/D is one of the most popular and successful optimization heuristic for multi-objective problems. It decomposes the problem into several, single-objective subproblems. By solving these in a co-evolutionary manner and archiving non-dominated solutions, it approximates or computes the Pareto front. Interestingly, so far no advantages from the co-evolutionary communication of subproblem solutions were proven. In this first mathematical runtime analysis addressing this research question, we investigate how the mutation-based MOEA/D solves the classic OneMinMax benchmark when solutions are exchanged among subproblems in different distances $r$. We show, for the first time, that the MOEA/D profits from an exchange of solutions, and that already very small communication radii $r$ are sufficient to maximally profit from this feature of the algorithm. More precisely, for all values $r \ge 1$ we prove a tight runtime guarantee of $Θ(n^2)$, where $n$ is the problem size. This is asymptotically faster than the known bound of $O(n^2 \log n)$ guarantee for $r=0$, which we complement with a matching bound of $Ω(n^2 \log n)$.

cs.NE↗