arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.35334

A Dynamic Decomposition Strategy for the MOEA/D With Proven Performance Guarantees

Benjamin Doerr·Martin S. Krejca·Noé Weeks
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The MOEA/D is one of the most successful multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. It operates by decomposing the optimization problem into single-objective subproblems, which are then solved in a co-evolutionary manner. The performance of the MOEA/D depends critically on this decomposition. In this work, we propose a novel way to adjust this decomposition on the fly, for the case of discrete bi-objective optimization. Different from all previous works in this direction, we support our new algorithm with a proven performance guarantee. This is the first work that rigorously proves the runtime of a dynamic multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. For monotonic distortions of the simple LOTZ benchmark, it is known that classic decompositions leave large holes in the Pareto front, making it very hard for the MOEA/D to cover the entire Pareto front. In contrast, we prove that our self-adjusting MOEA/D solves all these LOTZ problems in an expected number of $O(n^4)$ function evaluations. This relatively low runtime as well as the details of our mathematical proof show that the dynamic decomposition strategy indeed evolves a decomposition adjusted to each of these problem instances.

Explore related subjects

cs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Benjamin Doerr, Martin S. Krejca, Noé Weeks. 2026-10-26. A Dynamic Decomposition Strategy for the MOEA/D With Proven Performance Guarantees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Reconstruction differences rival individual differences in the fly compass connectome and break trained circuit models

Neural network models are increasingly constructed from synapse-resolution connectomes, and the same circuit is now available in reconstructions from other animals and pipelines. We do not know whether such models are dependent on the reconstruction they are built from, and whether connectome differences are biological or measurement errors. We studied the Drosophila head-direction circuit in nine versions: four flies (male CNS, hemibrain, FlyWire, BANC) and five variants of the same fly varying only by thresholds, proofreading or synapse detection. Using wiring-based correspondences validated by anatomical labels, we place all differences on one scale. A change of synapse detection within one fly changed the circuit more than halfway to the smallest between-fly difference on four distance measures; proofreading differences were smaller but depended on the metric, and left and right halves of one fly differed no more than random halves. Networks trained on each wiring to hold a cued heading developed near-perfect ring attractors, but their error increased from below 1 degree to 10-28 degrees when all weights changed by 1%. Training on each wiring did not transfer to any other connectome, including other versions of the same fly; refitting thirty cell-type gains, we repaired filtering-level differences but remaining error depended on wiring distance. Training with noise lowered precision and gave only partial transfer. In imaging data, the fly compass drifted gradually in darkness. Connectome-constrained models should report the reconstruction they were built on and be tested for robustness across reconstructions.

cs.NE↗
arXiv2026

Understanding the Co-evolutionary Solution Exchange of the MOEA/D: Already the Smallest Communication Radius Gives the Best-Possible Speed-Up

Besides domination-based algorithms such as the NSGA-II, the decomposition-based MOEA/D is one of the most popular and successful optimization heuristic for multi-objective problems. It decomposes the problem into several, single-objective subproblems. By solving these in a co-evolutionary manner and archiving non-dominated solutions, it approximates or computes the Pareto front. Interestingly, so far no advantages from the co-evolutionary communication of subproblem solutions were proven. In this first mathematical runtime analysis addressing this research question, we investigate how the mutation-based MOEA/D solves the classic OneMinMax benchmark when solutions are exchanged among subproblems in different distances $r$. We show, for the first time, that the MOEA/D profits from an exchange of solutions, and that already very small communication radii $r$ are sufficient to maximally profit from this feature of the algorithm. More precisely, for all values $r \ge 1$ we prove a tight runtime guarantee of $Θ(n^2)$, where $n$ is the problem size. This is asymptotically faster than the known bound of $O(n^2 \log n)$ guarantee for $r=0$, which we complement with a matching bound of $Ω(n^2 \log n)$.

cs.NE↗
arXiv2026

An Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm Based on Interpretable Active Preference Learning

Many decision-making tasks are inherently multi-objective. Interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms (iEMOAs) are particularly well-suited to help the decision-maker find their most preferred solution. However, many of these algorithms employ black-box preference models. For high-stakes decision-making tasks, like healthcare and defense, a high level of transparency is needed, for instance to support accountability. We propose an interpretable iEMOA which uses active learning to efficiently learn a tree-based preference model directly from pairwise comparisons. The survival operator of NSGA-II and NSGA-III is extended with the learned preference model to guide the algorithm towards the region of interest. An extensive experimental study compares the proposed method to a state-of-the-art black-box model and a state-of-the-art interpretable model. Results indicate that our proposed model outperforms the alternatives in terms of finding the most preferred solution at the cost of a slightly worse average final population. Finally, a case study on a real-life engineering problem illustrates how inspecting the learned model reveals which objectives drive the decision-maker's preferences.

cs.NE↗