arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.30998

A Personal History in Quantum Foundations: an Oral History Interview

Guy Hetzroni·Yakir Aharonov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This oral history interview provides Yakir Aharonov's personal and conceptual recollections from the 1950s to the 2000s, focusing on his academic trajectory, some of his major contributions to quantum foundations, and his perspective on the development of the field. The interview traces Aharonov's academic career through the Technion, University of Bristol, Brandeis University, Yeshiva University, University of South Carolina, Tel Aviv University, George Mason University, and Chapman University. The interview also traces the development of Aharonov's work and collaborations on the EPR paradox, time-energy uncertainty relations, quantum measurement theory, quantum frames of reference, the two-state vector formalism, weak values, protective measurements, and several other contributions. It includes recollections of meetings and discussions with David Bohm, Niels Bohr, John Clauser, Paul Dirac, Rudolf Peierls, Aage Petersen, and Abner Shimony. Also mentioned: David Albert, Jeeva Anandan, Peter Bergmann, Gideon Carmi, Avshalom Elitzur, Dave Finkelstein, Vladimir Fock, Itzhak Kalugai, Ed Lerner, Joel Lebowitz, Stanley Mandelstam, Yuval Ne'eman, Sandu Popescu, Maurice Pryce, Daniel Rohrlich, Nathan Rosen, Joseph Safko, Paul Singer, Daniele Struppa, Leonard Susskind, Lev Vaidman, Chien-Shiung Wu.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-phquant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Guy Hetzroni, Yakir Aharonov. 2026-10-22. A Personal History in Quantum Foundations: an Oral History Interview. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30998

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Black Holes are about Quantum Information

We review and analyse quantum information-theoretic approaches to black hole evaporation that purport to bring us closer to a resolution of the black hole information paradox. Our focus is on the Page-time paradox and on the contribution of the Hayden-Preskill model to understanding information release under the assumption of unitary evaporation. In this model, the black hole is taken to be a finite-dimensional quantum system whose dynamics can be represented by a quantum circuit, and its information-processing and communication abilities are studied. We identify the assumptions underlying this modelling and highlight two key features, fast scrambling dynamics and entanglement as a resource, that underpin the information release in the model. We argue that this reasoning exemplifies a broader change in how information is used in black hole physics, in which quantum information theory now provides a useful operational modelling framework. This application avoids earlier philosophical objections insofar as it is not based on epistemic ignorance and does not regard information as a substance. This line of reasoning has become central to the debate and, as such, warrants greater attention from the philosophy of physics community.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

Gibbs and Einstein in 1902: Parallel Constructions in Statistical Mechanics

This article reexamines the striking conceptual and formal parallels between Josiah Willard Gibbs Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics and Albert Einstein first paper on statistical mechanics. Although their derivations follow different paths, both arrive at the canonical distribution and construct closely related theoretical frameworks for thermal equilibrium. Each offers a mechanical grounding of the second law of thermodynamics and defines temperature as the quantity that equalises when systems exchange energy, thereby characterising equilibrium without recourse to kinetic theory. In both cases, the constructions rely on general mechanical principles, most notably energy conservation and Liouville theorem, combined with probabilistic reasoning, and deliberately set aside Boltzmann kinetic approach. Whereas Gibbs treatise quickly became a canonical reference, Einstein 1902 paper remained marginal in both physics and its historiography for more than half a century. Focusing primarily on that first article, while also considering the closely related papers of 1903 and 1904, the present study reviews the main historiographical interpretations of their reception. Particular attention is given to Paul Hertz two critical articles of 1910, which identified a close affinity between Gibbs's and Einstein's approaches and played an important role in Einstein subsequent distancing from his early statistical programme, following a private meeting in Basel that Einstein sought in preference to a public controversy. Drawing on new archival evidence concerning the rapid European dissemination of Gibbs book in the spring of 1902, the article reassesses the plausibility of Einstein later claim that he was unaware of Gibbs work at the time.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

The Geometry of the "Gauge Argument"

We show how the "gauge argument", widely criticized by philosophers as ad hoc and unconvincing, may be reconstructed rigorously, and, we believe, convincingly, as an argument concerning the geometry of vector bundles. In this form, the gauge argument has two parts, the first of which is strongly analogous to the Weyl-Stein argument for Galilean spacetime as the appropriate setting for Newtonian gravitation; and the second of which invokes a classic result in the Yang-Mills theory literature, due to Utiyama [1956, "Invariant Theoretical Interpretation of Interaction", Phys. Rev. 101, 1597].

physics.hist-ph↗