arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.26427

Almost Uniform Bias Correction for Persistent Panel Local Projections

Geert Dhaene·Arturas Juodis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Panel local projections are widely used to estimate impulse responses in policy analysis. This paper examines the properties of the fixed-effect estimator and various bias-correction methods in panel local projections, focusing on settings with autoregressive control variables. We analyze the bias and variance of these estimators while allowing for persistence in both the target and control variables. Our theoretical findings indicate that the half-panel jackknife has desirable bias-reducing properties beyond the stationary setup. For empirical researchers, we recommend using bias-correction-adjusted standard errors to account for the sampling uncertainty associated with the half-panel jackknife estimator, regardless of the time-series dimension of the data.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Geert Dhaene, Arturas Juodis. 2026-10-19. Almost Uniform Bias Correction for Persistent Panel Local Projections. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26427

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

What Impulse Response Do Instrumental Variables Identify?

We study what local projection instrumental variable (LP-IV) regressions identify when an instrument is correlated with several structural shocks, such as defense and non-defense spending shocks. LP-IV identifies an instrument-specific affine combination of the component impulse responses, possibly with negative weights. Over-identified 2SLS or GMM yields another such combination, and the over-identification test can reject even with valid instruments. With as many instruments as shocks, the component responses are identified when each shock has a policy variable (e.g., sectoral spending) and its impact on the other policy variables is restricted. We illustrate with government spending and tax multipliers.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Identifying Elasticities in Autocorrelated Time Series Using Causal Mechanism Graphs

Instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to estimate the price elasticity of demand from observational data. However, naive IV estimators may be inconsistent in settings with autocorrelated time series. We argue that causal graphs taking into account time structure can simplify IV identification and help select consistent estimators. More precisely, we propose to model equilibrium conditions using causal mechanism time graphs. These (acyclic) graphs allow us to maintain the assumption of a simultaneous determination of prices and quantities and come with an interpretable notion of intervention. They further allow us to exploit recent advances in graphical inference to derive valid IV estimators that are consistent under weak assumptions. Finally, we argue that observing significant differences between the estimates of presumably valid estimators can help to reject false model assumptions, thereby improving our understanding of underlying economic dynamics. We apply our approach to the German electricity market, estimating the price elasticity of demand from simulated and real-world data. The findings underscore the importance of accounting for structural autocorrelation in IV-based analysis.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Granular Instrumental Variables in Large Panels: Identification and Inference Across Strong, Nearly Weak, and Weak GIV

Granular Instrumental Variables (GIV), introduced by Gabaix and Koijen (2024), use idiosyncratic shocks to large units as instruments for aggregate endogenous variables. I develop asymptotic theory for GIV in large panels where both the cross section and time series grow (\(N,T\to\infty\)). I make two main contributions. First, I show that estimating the individual shocks used to construct the granular instrument has a first-order effect on the asymptotic variance of the GIV estimator. Existing methods do not account for this effect, leading to incorrect standard errors. I derive corrected inference. Second, I characterize how instrument strength changes as \(N\) grows, yielding strong, nearly-weak, and weak regimes. In the newly characterized nearly-weak regime, the instrument vanishes asymptotically but the estimator remains consistent and asymptotically normal, at a slower rate, when \(T\) grows sufficiently fast relative to \(N\). I apply the theory to estimate short-run supply and demand elasticities for crude oil, copper, and natural gas.

econ.EM↗