arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2607.02095

Granular Instrumental Variables in Large Panels: Identification and Inference Across Strong, Nearly Weak, and Weak GIV

Abstract

I develop the asymptotic theory for Granular Instrumental Variables (GIV) in large panels with both $N$ and $T$ growing. The strength of the GIV depends on the presence of dominant units with large shares. I find three regimes. First, when a few units dominate the aggregate, the instrument is strong. The GIV estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal at the standard $\sqrt{T}$ rate. Second, when large units stand out but do not dominate, the instrument weakens. But if the sample size ($T$) is larger than the cross-section ($N$), then the GIV estimator remains consistent and asymptotically normal, now at a rate slower than $\sqrt{T}$. Finally, when units are comparable in size and none stands out, the instrument is weak in the standard sense. Here the relative growth of $T$ and $N$ decides the outcome. If $N$ grows in proportion to $T$, the GIV estimator is inconsistent and has a non-standard distribution. Across all three regimes, the first-stage construction of the GIV changes the second-stage asymptotic variance. It replaces the structural error with its factor-residualised version. The correction has no determinate sign. Wald inference with the corrected variance is valid in the first two regimes. In the third I recommend a first-stage-corrected Anderson--Rubin test. Applying this theory to data, I find that copper and natural gas markets fall into the strong-instrument regime while crude oil is in the nearly weak regime, and I recover the short-run demand and supply elasticities of these commodities. Across the six elasticities the correction moves standard errors by up to a fifth, in both directions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gokul Gopalan Ramachandran. 2026-07-02. Granular Instrumental Variables in Large Panels: Identification and Inference Across Strong, Nearly Weak, and Weak GIV. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02095

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM