arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.25589

Linear Regression with Common Unobserved Heterogeneity

Abstract

We study inference on common slope parameters in linear panel models with two-way unobserved heterogeneity. In linear regression, bias arises from unobserved heterogeneity that is shared between the residual and the covariates. Our common unobserved heterogeneity (CUH) estimator targets this common variation directly: it searches over functionals of the residualised outcome for variation that also resides in the covariates, and seeks to further project out only bias-inducing variation. This makes the estimator less sensitive to weak outcome factors while avoiding the complete removal of exogenous variation in covariates that is unrelated to the confounding heterogeneity. We develop a weak-factor theory based on a singular-value strength index and establish $\sqrt{NT}$-asymptotic normality of the cross-fitted CUH estimator. Under homoskedastic errors, its asymptotic variance is no larger than that of a common correlated effects factor estimator. Simulations and empirical applications illustrate the resulting bias--variance trade-off and the gains from selectively removing common variation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kaicheng Chen, Hugo Freeman. 2026-10-18. Linear Regression with Common Unobserved Heterogeneity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25589

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

What Impulse Response Do Instrumental Variables Identify?

We study what local projection instrumental variable (LP-IV) regressions identify when an instrument is correlated with several structural shocks, such as defense and non-defense spending shocks. LP-IV identifies an instrument-specific affine combination of the component impulse responses, possibly with negative weights. Over-identified 2SLS or GMM yields another such combination, and the over-identification test can reject even with valid instruments. With as many instruments as shocks, the component responses are identified when each shock has a policy variable (e.g., sectoral spending) and its impact on the other policy variables is restricted. We illustrate with government spending and tax multipliers.

econ.EM↗

Identifying Elasticities in Autocorrelated Time Series Using Causal Mechanism Graphs

Instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to estimate the price elasticity of demand from observational data. However, naive IV estimators may be inconsistent in settings with autocorrelated time series. We argue that causal graphs taking into account time structure can simplify IV identification and help select consistent estimators. More precisely, we propose to model equilibrium conditions using causal mechanism time graphs. These (acyclic) graphs allow us to maintain the assumption of a simultaneous determination of prices and quantities and come with an interpretable notion of intervention. They further allow us to exploit recent advances in graphical inference to derive valid IV estimators that are consistent under weak assumptions. Finally, we argue that observing significant differences between the estimates of presumably valid estimators can help to reject false model assumptions, thereby improving our understanding of underlying economic dynamics. We apply our approach to the German electricity market, estimating the price elasticity of demand from simulated and real-world data. The findings underscore the importance of accounting for structural autocorrelation in IV-based analysis.

econ.EM↗

Granular Instrumental Variables in Large Panels: Identification and Inference Across Strong, Nearly Weak, and Weak GIV

Granular Instrumental Variables (GIV), introduced by Gabaix and Koijen (2024), use idiosyncratic shocks to large units as instruments for aggregate endogenous variables. I develop asymptotic theory for GIV in large panels where both the cross section and time series grow (\(N,T\to\infty\)). I make two main contributions. First, I show that estimating the individual shocks used to construct the granular instrument has a first-order effect on the asymptotic variance of the GIV estimator. Existing methods do not account for this effect, leading to incorrect standard errors. I derive corrected inference. Second, I characterize how instrument strength changes as \(N\) grows, yielding strong, nearly-weak, and weak regimes. In the newly characterized nearly-weak regime, the instrument vanishes asymptotically but the estimator remains consistent and asymptotically normal, at a slower rate, when \(T\) grows sufficiently fast relative to \(N\). I apply the theory to estimate short-run supply and demand elasticities for crude oil, copper, and natural gas.

econ.EM↗