arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.25453

Inference on Linear Programs via Feasibility Testing

Abstract

This paper studies inference on the value of a linear program (LP) when the objective and constraints are estimated. Using LP duality, we construct one- and two-sided confidence intervals by inverting tests of the feasibility of systems of linear inequalities. Existing tests yield asymptotically valid confidence intervals but can have poor power. We propose a modification that augments these systems with estimated ``box constraints.'' The resulting procedure has power against $N^{-1/2}$-local alternatives and yields confidence intervals of order $N^{-1/2}$. These results require only that the LP value be finite, and do not require compactness of the feasible region nor standard constraint qualifications. We obtain stronger guarantees under various constraint qualifications and establish uniform validity over large classes of DGPs when known deterministic constraints bound the primal and/or dual variables. Simulations demonstrate good finite-sample performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sofya Budanova, Eric Mbakop. 2026-10-18. Inference on Linear Programs via Feasibility Testing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25453

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

What Impulse Response Do Instrumental Variables Identify?

We study what local projection instrumental variable (LP-IV) regressions identify when an instrument is correlated with several structural shocks, such as defense and non-defense spending shocks. LP-IV identifies an instrument-specific affine combination of the component impulse responses, possibly with negative weights. Over-identified 2SLS or GMM yields another such combination, and the over-identification test can reject even with valid instruments. With as many instruments as shocks, the component responses are identified when each shock has a policy variable (e.g., sectoral spending) and its impact on the other policy variables is restricted. We illustrate with government spending and tax multipliers.

econ.EM↗

Identifying Elasticities in Autocorrelated Time Series Using Causal Mechanism Graphs

Instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to estimate the price elasticity of demand from observational data. However, naive IV estimators may be inconsistent in settings with autocorrelated time series. We argue that causal graphs taking into account time structure can simplify IV identification and help select consistent estimators. More precisely, we propose to model equilibrium conditions using causal mechanism time graphs. These (acyclic) graphs allow us to maintain the assumption of a simultaneous determination of prices and quantities and come with an interpretable notion of intervention. They further allow us to exploit recent advances in graphical inference to derive valid IV estimators that are consistent under weak assumptions. Finally, we argue that observing significant differences between the estimates of presumably valid estimators can help to reject false model assumptions, thereby improving our understanding of underlying economic dynamics. We apply our approach to the German electricity market, estimating the price elasticity of demand from simulated and real-world data. The findings underscore the importance of accounting for structural autocorrelation in IV-based analysis.

econ.EM↗

Granular Instrumental Variables in Large Panels: Identification and Inference Across Strong, Nearly Weak, and Weak GIV

Granular Instrumental Variables (GIV), introduced by Gabaix and Koijen (2024), use idiosyncratic shocks to large units as instruments for aggregate endogenous variables. I develop asymptotic theory for GIV in large panels where both the cross section and time series grow (\(N,T\to\infty\)). I make two main contributions. First, I show that estimating the individual shocks used to construct the granular instrument has a first-order effect on the asymptotic variance of the GIV estimator. Existing methods do not account for this effect, leading to incorrect standard errors. I derive corrected inference. Second, I characterize how instrument strength changes as \(N\) grows, yielding strong, nearly-weak, and weak regimes. In the newly characterized nearly-weak regime, the instrument vanishes asymptotically but the estimator remains consistent and asymptotically normal, at a slower rate, when \(T\) grows sufficiently fast relative to \(N\). I apply the theory to estimate short-run supply and demand elasticities for crude oil, copper, and natural gas.

econ.EM↗