arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.23944

TeleTwin: A Calibrated Digital Twin of Telegram Crisis Discourse as a Ground-Truth Testbed for Detecting LLM-Powered Information Operations

Despoina Antonakaki·Sotiris Ioannidis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large language models make it cheap to run influence operations whose messages never repeat, yet real platforms offer almost no ground truth for testing whether coordination detectors can find them. The problem is sharpest on Telegram, which moderates little and spreads content through broadcast channels and forwarding rather than a follow graph. We introduce TeleTwin, an LLM-powered digital twin of a Telegram crisis-discourse ecosystem in which channels are agents, each instantiated from the history of a real channel, calibrated on 1.07 million messages from 195 public channels on the Israel-Gaza and Iran-Israel conflict (March-August 2025). On a held-out period containing the June 2025 Iran-Israel war, the twin tracks daily dynamics better than statistical baselines (correlation 0.86 against 0.64) and reacts to the war unprompted, but it over-focuses on the conflict, over-amplifies forwarding cascades, underestimates the shock and writes recognisably LLM-like text. We then inject LLM-written campaigns with known membership into the real data and into the twin. In real data, identical-text, co-URL and synchrony detectors fail once a campaign rewords, staggers or drops links; multilingual semantic similarity recovers loud campaigns, including cross-lingual ones, but not quiet ones, and its false positives fall unevenly across political perspectives. Inside the twin all detectors fail, because the simulated background is about 40 times more semantically homogeneous than the real one. Digital twins can supply ground truth for campaigns, but not, without calibrating their diversity, a realistic background for evaluating semantic detectors.

Explore related subjects

cs.SIcs.CLcs.MA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Despoina Antonakaki, Sotiris Ioannidis. 2026-10-08. TeleTwin: A Calibrated Digital Twin of Telegram Crisis Discourse as a Ground-Truth Testbed for Detecting LLM-Powered Information Operations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23944

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

I CAN Debias: Uncovering and Enhancing Self-debiasing Mechanisms of Social Bias in LLMs

As LLMs rapidly advance and become increasingly agentic, mitigating social bias and ensuring fairness at scale have become critical challenges. Prior work has shown that LLMs exhibit an emergent self-debiasing capability-an intrinsic mechanism that enables them to avoid generating biased outputs-but this mechanism remains poorly understood, leaving existing bias-mitigation approaches heavily reliant on carefully curated prompts or inefficient training procedures that risk catastrophic forgetting. To address this gap, we propose I-CAN-Debias, a unified framework for uncovering and enhancing self-debiasing mechanisms in LLMs through behavior-grounded Consistency-contrast-Aware Neuron analysis, which defines self-debiasing neurons not by the magnitude of their responses to biased inputs but by activation patterns that distinguish successful debiasing from biased failures. Using I-CAN-Debias, we find that self-debiasing neurons account for less than 2% of model parameters yet are causally critical: deactivating them raises the biased-response rate above 95%. These neurons cluster in the query and value projections of later layers and exhibit highly asymmetric cross-category transferability. Furthermore, targeted fine-tuning of these neurons substantially improves fairness while preserving general capabilities. Importantly, models tuned with I-CAN-Debias generalize robustly across diverse evaluations beyond the training distribution, spanning open-ended fairness, jailbreak attacks, and implicit bias, without requiring test-time debiasing prompts. Together, these findings provide new mechanistic insights and a parameter-efficient approach toward developing fair and trustworthy AI systems.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

A Theoretical Perspective on Link Prediction Heuristics

In network analysis, nodes with different degrees are usually weighted differently in tasks such as link prediction. For example, two individuals connected to the same high-degree node (e.g., a celebrity) are often considered less likely to know each other than if they share a low-degree connection. In this paper, we theoretically justify the reasoning behind this heuristic using a graph generation model. In this model, nodes are embedded in a latent metric space, and edges are more likely to form between nearby nodes. We analytically derive degree-based weighting schemes for commonly used link prediction and similarity measures. In particular, we identify the optimal weighting scheme for the Common Neighbors index and extend our analysis to other popular heuristics, including the graph distance. Our theoretical findings align with previous empirical observations, and we further validate them through experiments on both synthetic and real-world networks.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Optimizing Marketing Budgets for Social Influence: A Generalized Fractional Incentives Framework

Marketing managers routinely allocate limited budgets across individuals in social networks whose responsiveness and influence vary substantially. We study the problem of Budgeted Generalized Fractional Influence Maximization (BGFIM), which captures the allocation of continuous levels of marketing spend across users in the presence of heterogeneous response and network spillovers. In this framework, adoption probabilities are governed by user-specific response functions that capture both baseline propensity and marginal responsiveness, while incentive costs vary across users. We propose a scalable solution approach based on a discrete greedy procedure with provable approximation guarantees, enabling tractable optimization under realistic budget constraints. Our formulation generalizes prior influence maximization models by allowing heterogeneous response and cost structures, providing a more flexible representation of targeted marketing interventions. Using experiments on multiple large-scale networks, we show that continuous allocation strategies can outperform standard heuristics and improve influence outcomes under heterogeneous conditions, and we illustrate how the framework can support profit-oriented decision making by identifying budget levels that balance marginal returns and costs. Overall, our results highlight the value of fine-grained budget allocation in networked marketing environments and offer a scalable approach for data-driven marketing resource allocation.

cs.SI↗