arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.25686

A Theoretical Perspective on Link Prediction Heuristics

Jiajie Shi·David A. Meyer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In network analysis, nodes with different degrees are usually weighted differently in tasks such as link prediction. For example, two individuals connected to the same high-degree node (e.g., a celebrity) are often considered less likely to know each other than if they share a low-degree connection. In this paper, we theoretically justify the reasoning behind this heuristic using a graph generation model. In this model, nodes are embedded in a latent metric space, and edges are more likely to form between nearby nodes. We analytically derive degree-based weighting schemes for commonly used link prediction and similarity measures. In particular, we identify the optimal weighting scheme for the Common Neighbors index and extend our analysis to other popular heuristics, including the graph distance. Our theoretical findings align with previous empirical observations, and we further validate them through experiments on both synthetic and real-world networks.

Explore related subjects

cs.SI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiajie Shi, David A. Meyer. 2026-10-19. A Theoretical Perspective on Link Prediction Heuristics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25686

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

I CAN Debias: Uncovering and Enhancing Self-debiasing Mechanisms of Social Bias in LLMs

As LLMs rapidly advance and become increasingly agentic, mitigating social bias and ensuring fairness at scale have become critical challenges. Prior work has shown that LLMs exhibit an emergent self-debiasing capability-an intrinsic mechanism that enables them to avoid generating biased outputs-but this mechanism remains poorly understood, leaving existing bias-mitigation approaches heavily reliant on carefully curated prompts or inefficient training procedures that risk catastrophic forgetting. To address this gap, we propose I-CAN-Debias, a unified framework for uncovering and enhancing self-debiasing mechanisms in LLMs through behavior-grounded Consistency-contrast-Aware Neuron analysis, which defines self-debiasing neurons not by the magnitude of their responses to biased inputs but by activation patterns that distinguish successful debiasing from biased failures. Using I-CAN-Debias, we find that self-debiasing neurons account for less than 2% of model parameters yet are causally critical: deactivating them raises the biased-response rate above 95%. These neurons cluster in the query and value projections of later layers and exhibit highly asymmetric cross-category transferability. Furthermore, targeted fine-tuning of these neurons substantially improves fairness while preserving general capabilities. Importantly, models tuned with I-CAN-Debias generalize robustly across diverse evaluations beyond the training distribution, spanning open-ended fairness, jailbreak attacks, and implicit bias, without requiring test-time debiasing prompts. Together, these findings provide new mechanistic insights and a parameter-efficient approach toward developing fair and trustworthy AI systems.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Optimizing Marketing Budgets for Social Influence: A Generalized Fractional Incentives Framework

Marketing managers routinely allocate limited budgets across individuals in social networks whose responsiveness and influence vary substantially. We study the problem of Budgeted Generalized Fractional Influence Maximization (BGFIM), which captures the allocation of continuous levels of marketing spend across users in the presence of heterogeneous response and network spillovers. In this framework, adoption probabilities are governed by user-specific response functions that capture both baseline propensity and marginal responsiveness, while incentive costs vary across users. We propose a scalable solution approach based on a discrete greedy procedure with provable approximation guarantees, enabling tractable optimization under realistic budget constraints. Our formulation generalizes prior influence maximization models by allowing heterogeneous response and cost structures, providing a more flexible representation of targeted marketing interventions. Using experiments on multiple large-scale networks, we show that continuous allocation strategies can outperform standard heuristics and improve influence outcomes under heterogeneous conditions, and we illustrate how the framework can support profit-oriented decision making by identifying budget levels that balance marginal returns and costs. Overall, our results highlight the value of fine-grained budget allocation in networked marketing environments and offer a scalable approach for data-driven marketing resource allocation.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Where Does Rhetorical Distortion Live? A Multi-Platform, Multi-Language Measurement of Influencer Content

Much of the manipulation in online influencer content is not false but disproportionate: an accurate fact is framed as historic, urgent, or catastrophic. Fact-checking and clickbait detection are not designed to capture such framing, and little is known about where it originates: with the creator, the topic, the platform, or the audience that replies. We operationalize rhetorical distortion through five literature-grounded dimensions (Significance Inflation, Anxiety Manufacturing, Novelty Claims, Loaded Language, and Temporal Distortion) and measure it with a three-tier pipeline in which bilingual lexical rules propose candidates, negative filters cancel known false-positive contexts, and an LLM verifies or relabels the candidates. Applying the pipeline to 13,060 posts from 330 accounts on six platforms (RSS/newsletters, YouTube, Bluesky, Reddit, Weibo, and X/Twitter), we find that platform is far more strongly associated with account-level distortion than content category (Kruskal-Wallis $\varepsilon^2=0.33$; two-way ANOVA $η_p^2=0.49$ for platform vs. $0.09$ for category). X/Twitter scores highest (DI 7.74 vs. 0.78 for RSS). Classifying tweets and their replies separately shows where this comes from: the reply layer readers see under a post (its top-5 replies) carries 3.5x the distortion of the tweet it answers (7.65 vs. 2.17, $p<10^{-6}$, 36 of 43 accounts), driven by Loaded Language. At equal text length the gap shrinks to 1.5x but remains significant, and creator tweets alone are statistically indistinguishable from YouTube and Bluesky. Two independent human annotators confirm the reply gap, and the platform ordering and the reply gap replicate with GPT-4o as a second classifier. On threaded platforms, measured distortion thus lives largely in the audience layer, which motivates measurement that separates creator and reply text.

cs.SI↗