arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.18668

When Platforms Pay Users to Correct Misinformation: Revenue Incentives and Governance Capacity in Weibo Annotations

Chichen Lin·Huaijin Xie·Wenhan Xie·Weijian Fan·Xiao Han·Yijie Jin·Xiaojie Hao·Jiaying Wu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Crowdsourced misinformation governance systems such as Community Notes and Weibo Annotations depend on sustained corrective labor. How monetary incentives shape participation and subsequent governance outcomes remains poorly understood. We conduct a mixed-methods study of Weibo Annotations, analyzing 102,994 posts and 431,407 comments from 2023--2026, alongside interviews with 15 contributors. We find concentrated corrective labor, limited observed display, and weak quality--engagement alignment. Policy introduction was associated with sharp increases in contributor participation and annotation production. Model-assisted quality followed its expected trajectory, evidence for additional display growth was inconclusive, and engagement per annotation fell below expectation. Public discussions and interviews reveal substantial verification demands, difficult-to-interpret review processes, uneven platform knowledge, and gaps in contributor protection. We identify four recurring bottlenecks in governance orchestration: participation, review, reach, and protection. Effective incentive design therefore depends on whether platforms can support these downstream processes as corrective labor expands.

Explore related subjects

cs.SI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chichen Lin, Huaijin Xie, Wenhan Xie, Weijian Fan, Xiao Han, Yijie Jin, Xiaojie Hao, Jiaying Wu. 2026-10-13. When Platforms Pay Users to Correct Misinformation: Revenue Incentives and Governance Capacity in Weibo Annotations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18668

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Ensemble-based Deep Multilayer Community Search

Multilayer graphs, consisting of multiple interconnected layers, are widely used to model diverse relationships in the real world. A community is a cohesive subgraph that offers valuable insights for analyzing (multilayer) graphs. Recently, there has been an emerging trend focused on searching query-driven communities within the multilayer graphs. However, existing methods for multilayer community search are either 1) rule-based, which suffer from structure inflexibility; or 2) learning-based, which rely on labeled data or fail to capture layer-specific characteristics. To address these, we propose EnMCS, an Ensemble-based unsupervised (i.e., label-free) Multilayer Community Search framework. EnMCS contains two key components, i.e., HoloSearch which identifies potential communities in each layer while integrating both layer-shared and layer-specific information, and EMerge which is an Expectation-Maximization (EM)-based method that synthesizes the potential communities from each layer into a consensus community. Specifically, HoloSearch first employs a graph-diffusion-based model that integrates three label-free loss functions to learn layer-specific and layer-shared representations for each node. Communities in each layer are then identified based on nodes that exhibit high similarity in layer-shared representations while demonstrating low similarity in layer-specific representations w.r.t. the query nodes. To account for the varying layer-specific characteristics of each layer when merging communities, EMerge models the error rates of layers and true community as latent variables. It then employs the EM algorithm to simultaneously minimize the error rates of layers and predict the final consensus community through iterative maximum likelihood estimation. Experiments over 10 real-world datasets highlight the superiority of EnMCS in terms of both efficiency and effectiveness.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Parents? Prediction Gaps in University Completion Using Population-Scale Networks and Flexible Machine Learning

How predictable is children's educational attainment from the wider social contexts in which they grow up, once parental background is known? Sociological research places households, schools, neighborhoods, and extended kin central to intergenerational reproduction, yet their predictive value beyond parental background is rarely tested. This matters because the contribution of social contexts helps distinguish whether they operate as independent sources of inequality or as channels through which parental advantage is reproduced. Using Dutch population-scale administrative data, we construct a network linking a full cohort of children aged 11-12 to parents, extended kin, classmates, household members, and neighbors, and predict university completion at ages 24-25. We compare logistic regression and gradient boosting (which use individual-level aggregates of these contexts) with graph neural networks (GNNs) operating directly on the network. We refer to differences in out-of-sample performance as prediction gaps. We find small overall prediction gaps because parental socioeconomic background captures most predictable variation; even GNNs add little once parents are known. Prediction gaps are largest among children without a registered father, especially girls and those with less-educated mothers. Methodologically, we argue that prediction gaps can support sociological theory-building: small gaps show where current theory-based models already explain what can be measured; large gaps identify where targeted mechanism-focused research is warranted.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Theoretical Analysis of DomiRank Centrality: Automorphism, Entropy, and Graph Transformations

DomiRank is a node-importance algorithm for unweighted networks, defined by a dynamical model governed by a competition-strength parameter, a dominance threshold, and a decay rate. We study its relations with graph automorphism: automorphism-related vertices share the same DomiRank value, and a graph whose values are pairwise distinct must be asymmetric; we derive DomiRank properties of regular and vertex-transitive graphs and bound the number of distinct values by that of the orbits. For DomiRank entropy, the maximum over connected graphs is attained only by regular graphs, and on the effective (truncated) distribution it decreases monotonically with the competition parameter on all four tested networks, while a sufficient-condition theorem and a refined conjecture cover the theoretical entropy; we further identify the initial entropy derivative with the degree--log-degree edge covariance, making the decrease rigorous near vanishing competition for structurally disassortative graphs (including all tested networks) and yielding an assortative counterexample; tuning sigma shifts node identification from important to dominant. We study how graph transformations (vertex similarity, partitions, edge swaps, m-products) affect the DomiRank vector, and characterize sigma's sensitivity and limits: the normalized distribution is sigma-invariant iff the degree vector is an adjacency-matrix eigenvector, and sigma interpolates between degree and least-eigenvector centrality; experiments on four real networks confirm it. DomiRank is thus a tunable complement to principal-eigenvector centrality. Since parameterization by sigma is a structural property of the measure, not a guarantee of downstream advantage, we also relate these results to the companion null-model study of how much of DomiRank's task-level edge over a degree baseline survives a degree correction.

cs.SI↗