Theoretical Analysis of DomiRank Centrality: Automorphism, Entropy, and Graph Transformations

Yingying Zhang; Chengye Zhao

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.00107

Theoretical Analysis of DomiRank Centrality: Automorphism, Entropy, and Graph Transformations

Yingying Zhang·Chengye Zhao

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

DomiRank is a node-importance algorithm for unweighted networks, defined by a dynamical-system model whose steady state is governed by a competition-strength parameter, a dominance threshold, and a natural decay rate. We study its intrinsic relations with graph automorphism: vertices mapped to each other by an automorphism share the same DomiRank value, and a graph whose DomiRank values are pairwise distinct must be asymmetric; we derive DomiRank properties of regular and vertex-transitive graphs and bound the number of orbits by that of distinct DomiRank values. For DomiRank entropy, the maximum over connected graphs is attained only by regular graphs, and under sufficient conditions (rigorously in the low-competition regime) the entropy decreases monotonically with the competition parameter, a behavior observed on all tested networks and conjectured to hold generally; tuning sigma shifts the identification from important to dominant key nodes. We also study how graph transformations (vertex similarity, vertex partitions, edge swaps, m-products) affect the DomiRank vector, and characterize analytically the sensitivity and limiting behavior of sigma: the normalized DomiRank distribution is sigma-invariant iff the degree vector is an eigenvector of the adjacency matrix, and sigma interpolates continuously between degree and least-eigenvector centrality; experiments on four real networks confirm these results. These results position DomiRank as a tunable complement to principal-eigenvector centrality, with distinctive behavior under strong competition and new tools for node-importance evaluation. Because the parameterization by sigma is a structural property of the measure, not a guarantee of advantage on a downstream task, we also relate these results to the companion null-model study of how much of DomiRank's task-level edge over a degree baseline survives an explicit degree correction.

Explore related subjects

cs.SI math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yingying Zhang, Chengye Zhao. 2026-10-07. Theoretical Analysis of DomiRank Centrality: Automorphism, Entropy, and Graph Transformations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00107

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SparkAlign: A Star-Hopping Heuristic for Efficient Unsupervised Plain Graph Alignment

Unsupervised plain graph alignment (UPGA) seeks corresponding nodes between two graphs from topology alone, without attributes or seed anchors. The dominant embed-then-match paradigm is expensive on both fronts: it repeatedly retrains node embeddings and then solves a costly global assignment, so it scales poorly to large graphs. We present SparkAlign, a training-free heuristic that, inspired by star-hopping in celestial navigation, locates a node's counterpart by measuring its heat-diffusion proximity to a shared set of high-confidence landmark matches. Although heuristic in spirit, the descriptor is principled: diffusion makes structurally equivalent nodes comparable across graphs, and a short stability analysis justifies a finite diffusion depth. Matching then uses two sparse, highly parallel strategies that avoid dense global assignment, one favoring speed and one preserving one-to-one consistency on a restricted candidate set. On three benchmarks SparkAlign attains accuracy approaching a structural identifiability reference while running up to two orders of magnitude faster than the strongest baseline and seeding markedly more accurate pseudo-anchors. Our code is available at https://github.com/MaxQ545/SparkAlign

cs.SI↗

arXiv2026

A General Capacity Frontier of Complex Networks

From cells to cities, ecosystems to economies, complex networks exhibit peak intensities that define their empirical limit. Estimating these limits traditionally requires domain-specific knowledge. We demonstrate that a wide range of complex networks share a capacity frontier that constrains these maxima. We formalize this regularity by proposing Structural Capacity Theory for Network Substrate Structured Systems. These systems couple a fixed network substrate with an observable dynamical process. The frontier is learned from a vector representation of the network substrate and modulated log-additively by a vector representation of the dynamical process. Frontiers trained on one set of domains reliably bound empirical maxima of entirely different ones without observing their peak intensities or simulating their dynamics. Independent learning paradigms converge on consistent upper bounds. Frontier performance is stable under perturbation, yet degrades under deliberate falsification, with no performance gain under ablation. These findings support the capacity frontier as a generalizable constraint that describes how network structure bounds dynamical processes across otherwise unrelated systems.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2026

When Exposure Is Not Attention: Auditing the Preference-Exposure-Consumption Gap in Personalized News Recommenders

Personalized news platforms are often evaluated as if stated preferences, logged recommendation exposure, and click consumption form a single coherent pipeline. Collapsing these layers can distort audit conclusions: a platform may appear more aligned or diverse than observed click consumption supports, which can misdirect diversity governance or algorithmic intervention. We introduce a reusable Preference-Exposure-Consumption (PEC) audit framework that separates stated preference, observed weighted profile state, logged recommendation exposure, app-surface pathways, and click consumption under explicit observability boundaries. Using six months of logs from a deployed mobile news application, we audit 1,583 user profiles, 95,143 logged recommendation items, and 17,512 click events. Each trace type contributes distinct information; none directly substitutes for another. Preference-consumption alignment exceeds chance-based null baselines but captures only part of users' top-consumed category set. Logged recommendation lists contain clicked articles more often than a date-matched candidate-pool baseline predicts (11.29% vs 9.13%; top-5 lift 1.47x), but many clicks arrive through other app surfaces. Raw exposure-consumption diversity gaps shrink under count matching, yet concentration mismatch persists in the audit-eligible cohort (HHI gap 0.082). Together, the results show that audit conclusions change depending on whether platforms measure stated preference, logged exposure, or click consumption.

cs.SI↗