arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.13419

EEG Entrainment to Non-Speech Rhythmic Patterns Associated with Dimensions of Language Performance

Francisco J. Martínez-Murcia·Nicolás J. Gallego-Molina·Marco A. Formoso·Andrés Ortiz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Developmental dyslexia (DLX) affects 5-12% of the global population and impairs learning to read. Its biological basis, particularly the difficulties observed in oral phonological tasks, remains debated. Entrainment, the coupling of brain oscillations to speech rhythms, is essential for encoding phonological representations. We investigated whether brain entrainment to non-speech rhythms could predict DLX in 48 participants listening to white noise amplitude-modulated at rates matching Spanish speech units. Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) signals yielded accurate DLX prediction for the 40 Hz stimulus using the Heights Ratio PAC measure (balanced accuracy 0.929, p = 0.0069, in the best case), indicating a stronger phonemic entrainment deficit in dyslexic individuals. Regression analysis in control (CTL) participants showed a strong dependence between reading performance scores and greater entrainment in language-associated brain regions. In particular, participants with poorer phonemic awareness, reading comprehension, or rapid automatized naming showed greater right-hemisphere entrainment to the 40 Hz stimulus. This finding adds evidence for the hemispheric compensatory mechanisms hypothesized in the literature. In conclusion, our methodology identifies dyslexia-specific entrainment patterns near language-associated brain regions, together with compensatory entrainment in right-hemisphere areas.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francisco J. Martínez-Murcia, Nicolás J. Gallego-Molina, Marco A. Formoso, Andrés Ortiz. 2026-10-09. EEG Entrainment to Non-Speech Rhythmic Patterns Associated with Dimensions of Language Performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13419

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoding Alignment without Encoding Alignment: A critique of similarity analysis in neuroscience

RSA and CKA are standard metrics for comparing neural representations across brain regions, organisms, and deep learning models. We demonstrate a fundamental weakness: these decoding-based metrics are insensitive to encoding manifold topology---the internal functional organization of a neural population. In a controlled MNIST experiment, RSA, CKA, and Procrustes $R^2$ remain statistically unchanged when encoding topology is causally manipulated via an auxiliary clustering loss, while the two model populations differ significantly in attribution patterns, weight-graph assortativity, and out-of-distribution robustness. Across biological systems and machine learning models, similar decoding behavior can arise from small, non-representative subpopulations, and alignment metrics are insensitive to encoding manifold topology even when it is fundamentally altered. These findings bear directly on mechanistic interpretability: standard alignment metrics cannot distinguish whether two networks share the same computational circuits or merely produce indistinguishable aggregate outputs. We propose encoding manifolds and Gromov-Wasserstein distance as complementary diagnostics for any decoding-based similarity claim, and provide a Neural Manifold Explorer tool at https://johannesbertram.github.io/FNN_Manifolds/index.html for further experimentation.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

FlyHack: Stress-Testing Mechanistic Claims in a Connectome-Constrained Visual Model

Connectome-constrained neural networks make biological components directly accessible to intervention, but their mechanistic conclusions can still depend on the comparison model, intervention, circuit representation and trained solution. We stress-test these dependencies in flyvis, a \emph{Drosophila} motion-vision model, using its 50-model ensemble, task-matched causal CNN controls and replicated interventions. At the level of model behaviour, three-level reverse-phi reversal in flyvis is strongly period- and velocity-dependent and also appears in task-matched CNNs; neither family reproduces the fly's stationary-sawtooth response. Adversarial direction reversal requires a perturbation bound of 0.21--0.27 times stimulus contrast in flyvis versus 0.13--0.25 in CNNs, but the gap over a parameter-matched CNN largely closes for larger CNNs. At the level of mechanism, matching attribution to the intervention matters: for held-out-mean replacement, first-order edge attribution patching reaches pooled AUROC 0.970 and Spearman 0.872, versus 0.933 and 0.126 when its zero-aligned score is evaluated against the same ground truth. Circuit conclusions also vary with representation and ensemble member. Greedy cell-type sets meet a model-relative T4/T5 tuning criterion in 25 of 50 models, while T4/T5 output silencing reduces the tested optic-flow behaviour to at most two of eight clips in 40. In six models where the cell-type search first succeeds, the corresponding connection sets can be pruned to 13--31 added classes; under an additional two-sided response-amplitude check, only two of those six first-success cell-type sets still meet the tuning threshold. These results support a narrower use of connectome-constrained models: they make mechanistic hypotheses directly testable, but the resulting claims must be scoped to the model family, intervention, representation and trained solution.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Excitability across scales: a unifying EI model

Neuronal excitability is commonly modeled using different principles at the cellular and population scales, making it difficult to study how microscopic mechanisms shape macroscopic activity. We introduce a spatiotemporal excitatory-inhibitory (EI) model that unifies these scales through a common mixed-feedback architecture. The model retains the conductance-based circuit structure of Hodgkin-Huxley models and describes intrinsic and synaptic currents through memductances whose temporal and spatial voltage dependence encodes dynamics at the relevant scale. In its minimal form, temporal excitability arises from fast excitatory feedback opposed by slower inhibitory feedback, while spatial excitability arises from short-range excitation opposed by longer-range inhibition, recovering the core lateral-inhibition motif of Amari neural fields. We show that combining these mechanisms gives rise to population excitability in strongly heterogeneous populations. In particular, the model generates population spikes that are localized in both space and time and possess population-level scales distinct from those of individual neuronal spikes, despite substantial cell-to-cell parameter variability. We then show that both intrinsic temporal excitability and spatial synaptic feedback are required for coherent mean-field events and robust spatiotemporal population rhythms. Finally, selective modulation of memductances in a subset of the population tunes the frequency of the population rhythm, illustrating how changes at the cellular scale can shape macroscopic dynamics. By separating circuit architecture from modeling scale, the proposed framework provides a physically interpretable approach to analyzing and designing neuronal excitability across scales.

q-bio.NC↗