arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.13275

Excitability across scales: a unifying EI model

Thomas S. J. Burger·Rodolphe Sepulchre
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Neuronal excitability is commonly modeled using different principles at the cellular and population scales, making it difficult to study how microscopic mechanisms shape macroscopic activity. We introduce a spatiotemporal excitatory-inhibitory (EI) model that unifies these scales through a common mixed-feedback architecture. The model retains the conductance-based circuit structure of Hodgkin-Huxley models and describes intrinsic and synaptic currents through memductances whose temporal and spatial voltage dependence encodes dynamics at the relevant scale. In its minimal form, temporal excitability arises from fast excitatory feedback opposed by slower inhibitory feedback, while spatial excitability arises from short-range excitation opposed by longer-range inhibition, recovering the core lateral-inhibition motif of Amari neural fields. We show that combining these mechanisms gives rise to population excitability in strongly heterogeneous populations. In particular, the model generates population spikes that are localized in both space and time and possess population-level scales distinct from those of individual neuronal spikes, despite substantial cell-to-cell parameter variability. We then show that both intrinsic temporal excitability and spatial synaptic feedback are required for coherent mean-field events and robust spatiotemporal population rhythms. Finally, selective modulation of memductances in a subset of the population tunes the frequency of the population rhythm, illustrating how changes at the cellular scale can shape macroscopic dynamics. By separating circuit architecture from modeling scale, the proposed framework provides a physically interpretable approach to analyzing and designing neuronal excitability across scales.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NCcs.SYeess.SY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas S. J. Burger, Rodolphe Sepulchre. 2026-10-09. Excitability across scales: a unifying EI model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13275

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoding Alignment without Encoding Alignment: A critique of similarity analysis in neuroscience

RSA and CKA are standard metrics for comparing neural representations across brain regions, organisms, and deep learning models. We demonstrate a fundamental weakness: these decoding-based metrics are insensitive to encoding manifold topology---the internal functional organization of a neural population. In a controlled MNIST experiment, RSA, CKA, and Procrustes $R^2$ remain statistically unchanged when encoding topology is causally manipulated via an auxiliary clustering loss, while the two model populations differ significantly in attribution patterns, weight-graph assortativity, and out-of-distribution robustness. Across biological systems and machine learning models, similar decoding behavior can arise from small, non-representative subpopulations, and alignment metrics are insensitive to encoding manifold topology even when it is fundamentally altered. These findings bear directly on mechanistic interpretability: standard alignment metrics cannot distinguish whether two networks share the same computational circuits or merely produce indistinguishable aggregate outputs. We propose encoding manifolds and Gromov-Wasserstein distance as complementary diagnostics for any decoding-based similarity claim, and provide a Neural Manifold Explorer tool at https://johannesbertram.github.io/FNN_Manifolds/index.html for further experimentation.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

FlyHack: Stress-Testing Mechanistic Claims in a Connectome-Constrained Visual Model

Connectome-constrained neural networks make biological components directly accessible to intervention, but their mechanistic conclusions can still depend on the comparison model, intervention, circuit representation and trained solution. We stress-test these dependencies in flyvis, a \emph{Drosophila} motion-vision model, using its 50-model ensemble, task-matched causal CNN controls and replicated interventions. At the level of model behaviour, three-level reverse-phi reversal in flyvis is strongly period- and velocity-dependent and also appears in task-matched CNNs; neither family reproduces the fly's stationary-sawtooth response. Adversarial direction reversal requires a perturbation bound of 0.21--0.27 times stimulus contrast in flyvis versus 0.13--0.25 in CNNs, but the gap over a parameter-matched CNN largely closes for larger CNNs. At the level of mechanism, matching attribution to the intervention matters: for held-out-mean replacement, first-order edge attribution patching reaches pooled AUROC 0.970 and Spearman 0.872, versus 0.933 and 0.126 when its zero-aligned score is evaluated against the same ground truth. Circuit conclusions also vary with representation and ensemble member. Greedy cell-type sets meet a model-relative T4/T5 tuning criterion in 25 of 50 models, while T4/T5 output silencing reduces the tested optic-flow behaviour to at most two of eight clips in 40. In six models where the cell-type search first succeeds, the corresponding connection sets can be pruned to 13--31 added classes; under an additional two-sided response-amplitude check, only two of those six first-success cell-type sets still meet the tuning threshold. These results support a narrower use of connectome-constrained models: they make mechanistic hypotheses directly testable, but the resulting claims must be scoped to the model family, intervention, representation and trained solution.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Anxiety and Avoidance: A Dynamic Feedback-Regulation Framework for Adult Romantic Attachment

Adult attachment is commonly represented by attachment anxiety and avoidance, but these person-level dimensions do not by themselves specify how momentary relational conditions are perceived, compared with desired conditions, translated into action, and updated after interpersonal feedback. We present the Attachment Regulation and Control (ARC) framework as an integrative feedback-regulation account that makes these temporal assumptions explicit and empirically testable. In ARC, control refers to feedback-based regulation toward relational goals in the control-theoretic sense, not interpersonal dominance, coercion, or a generalized need for control. ARC does not claim a novel control-system architecture. Instead, it synthesizes established control-theoretic attachment ideas, secure-base representations, perceived partner responsiveness, relational discrepancy, dyadic regulation, and recovery into a parsimonious sequence for adult romantic relationships: perceived relational state, desired relational state, discrepancy, regulatory action, partner feedback, state updating, and recovery. The framework treats the discrepancy score itself as a falsifiable modeling restriction by comparing it with perceived-state-only, unconstrained perceived-plus-desired-state, and asymmetric discrepancy alternatives. Attachment anxiety and avoidance form core regulation moderators. Secure-base representation is a candidate requiring incremental prediction of recovery outcomes. Mentalized affectivity and regulation flexibility remain optional moderators, while adult disorganization is an independent extension outcome.

q-bio.NC↗