Gold nanorod radioenhancement: interpreting Monte Carlo dose enhancement across geometry, composition, coating, and localization

Abstract

Nanoparticle radiosensitization depends on interconnected NP properties, yet geometry, elemental composition, surface coating, and localization are typically studied separately, with their combined biological impact rarely assessed in one framework. Drawing on TOPAS Monte Carlo simulations from PhD research, we consolidated four investigations of metallic nanorods, mainly gold nanorods (AuNRs), examining these parameters across closely linked studies. The findings reveal that each parameter can influence over a distinct spatial range. Nanorod geometry primarily alters the spectrum and distribution of low-energy Auger-Meitner electrons emitted within tens of nanometers. Elemental composition induces significant near-field dose enhancement that rapidly attenuates and becomes negligible beyond roughly 1 um. Surface coatings reduce the fluence of secondary electrons below 3.5 keV, absorbed within about 150 nm of the surface, lowering physical dose contribution by 1-7%. Since coatings predominantly remove low-energy electrons, radiolytic yield changes through a shift in the electron energy spectrum, not directly following dose response. At the vascular scale, the enhanced dose region extends to approximately 10 um from the vessel wall, meaning NP localization determines where the biological target sits relative to radiation sources. Collectively, no single design parameter serves as a universal predictor of radiosensitization. Translating physical radioenhancement into biological effect depends on whether the target lies within each parameter's effective range. Furthermore, charged-particle equilibrium (CPE) correction, applied where beam confinement necessitated it, substantially alters calculated dose enhancement ratios. Consequently, scoring distance and CPE-corrected values should be explicitly reported to ensure comparability across studies.