arXiv · 2610.10173
When Exposure Is Not Attention: Auditing the Preference-Exposure-Consumption Gap in Personalized News Recommenders
Abstract
Personalized news platforms are often evaluated as if stated preferences, logged recommendation exposure, and click consumption form a single coherent pipeline. Collapsing these layers can distort audit conclusions: a platform may appear more aligned or diverse than observed click consumption supports, which can misdirect diversity governance or algorithmic intervention. We introduce a reusable Preference-Exposure-Consumption (PEC) audit framework that separates stated preference, observed weighted profile state, logged recommendation exposure, app-surface pathways, and click consumption under explicit observability boundaries. Using six months of logs from a deployed mobile news application, we audit 1,583 user profiles, 95,143 logged recommendation items, and 17,512 click events. Each trace type contributes distinct information; none directly substitutes for another. Preference-consumption alignment exceeds chance-based null baselines but captures only part of users' top-consumed category set. Logged recommendation lists contain clicked articles more often than a date-matched candidate-pool baseline predicts (11.29% vs 9.13%; top-5 lift 1.47x), but many clicks arrive through other app surfaces. Raw exposure-consumption diversity gaps shrink under count matching, yet concentration mismatch persists in the audit-eligible cohort (HHI gap 0.082). Together, the results show that audit conclusions change depending on whether platforms measure stated preference, logged exposure, or click consumption.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Woojin Park. 2026-10-07. When Exposure Is Not Attention: Auditing the Preference-Exposure-Consumption Gap in Personalized News Recommenders. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10173
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.