arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.23603

SC Derandomization for Regular ROBPs and Models Beyond BPL

Abstract

We study SC derandomizations for regular read-once branching programs (ROBPs) and computation models beyond BPL. For regular ROBPs with length $n$, width $w$, and multiple accept nodes, we attain three results. 1. When $n \le w$, we show an SC derandomization with space $O(\log^2 n+\log w)$ and error $1/\text{poly}(nw)$. 2. When $n \ge w$, we show an SC derandomization with space $O(\log n \log w)$ and error $1/\text{poly}(w)$. 3. When $w=O(\log n)$, we show an optimal $O(\log n)$ space derandomization with error $1/\text{poly}(w)$. We further show that two super sets of BPL can be computed in SC. 1. For probabilistic logspace TMs with a two-way access random tape, we show that it can be approximated in SC if each entry of the random tape is accessed for at most a constant number of times. 2. For probabilistic logspace TMs with a polynomial size stack, i.e. probabilistic logspace Auxiliary Push-down Machines (AuxPDMs), we show that it can be approximated in SC if the timings of push/pop/idle stack operations do not depend on the randomness. The first model is the read-multiplicity model considered by Impagliazzo, Nisan, Wigderson (STOC'94), in which they show that their INW generator can fool such computations. For the second model, we indicate that it contains candidate languages separating BQL from BPL considered by Apers and Edenhofer (CCC'25).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kuan Cheng, Ruiyang Wu. 2026-09-20. SC Derandomization for Regular ROBPs and Models Beyond BPL. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23603

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC