arXiv · 2609.24272
Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error
Abstract
We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M. Utkan Gezer. 2026-09-21. Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24272
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.