arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.20281

Contextual Fraction Beyond Satisfiability: Pure NAE Completeness, Exact Orbit Packings, and Width Barriers

Abstract

The contextual fraction measures how much globally consistent probability can be packed beneath prescribed local event probabilities. We study the quantitative regime in which supported global assignments exist but the contextual fraction is nontrivial. For balanced relational lifts, we identify the noncontextual fraction with a capacity-constrained packing of global homomorphisms and prove an exact orbit-capacity quotient under finite group symmetries. For the uniform Boolean relation $\NAE_3$, this becomes a minority-position congestion game on proper hypergraph two-colourings: \[ \NCF(e_H)=\frac{1}{3β(H)}. \] We also obtain a minimax dual, a cut-polytope formulation, and explicit values $2/3$ and $1/2$. For exact hardness, we map a graph $G$ to an always-two-colourable anchor hypergraph $A(G)$ with \[ \NCF(e_{A(G)})=1 \Longleftrightarrow χ_f(G)\le3. \] We prove quantitative stability in terms of $χ_f(G)$ and construct a six-edge pure-$\NAE_3$ equality gadget that preserves the full noncontextual fraction under bounded-occurrence compilation. Thus deciding $\CF=0$ is NP-complete for simple $3$-uniform hypergraphs of maximum degree seven, even with a supplied proper two-colouring. We further prove \[ \NCF(\widehat e^{\,\vartheta}) =\vartheta+(1-\vartheta)\NCF(e). \] This yields NP-hardness of distinguishing $\NCF=1/2$ from $\NCF\ge2/3$ on an always-satisfiable fixed five-ary switch template, and additive hardness below $1/12$. A gated colouring construction gives hardness within $1/2-\varepsilon$ for every $\varepsilon>0$. Finally, bounded-treewidth instances admit exact compact extended formulations, while explicit families have extension complexity $2^{Ω(\sqrt N)}$ via cut-polytope projections.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ronald Katende. 2026-07-29. Contextual Fraction Beyond Satisfiability: Pure NAE Completeness, Exact Orbit Packings, and Width Barriers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20281

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

CVP Is NP-Complete for Principal Cyclotomic Ideals

We prove that exact Euclidean decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on the coefficient lattices of nonzero principal ideals in the power-of-two cyclotomic rings $R_d:=\mathbb{Z}[y]/(y^d+1)$. Our deterministic reduction from Exact Cover by 3-Sets (X3C) produces a target and a squared threshold $Δ$ such that the closest squared distance is exactly $Δ$ in YES instances and at least $Δ+4$ in NO instances. This also implies $\mathsf{NP}$-hardness of exact search-CVP under polynomial-time Turing reductions. We also transfer the resulting principal-ideal CVP instances to full-rank principal ideals of the cyclic quotient ring $\mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^D-1)$, where $D:=2d$. Their coefficient lattices are invariant under cyclic coordinate shifts. The lift preserves principality and multiplies corresponding squared distances by eight. Thus, on principal cyclic ideal lattices, exact decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete and exact search-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. We also obtain uniformly computable fixed cyclotomic and cyclic families in which only the target and threshold depend on the X3C collection. Consequently, a polynomial-time solution to exact decision-CVPP on either family would imply $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathsf{P}/\mathrm{poly}$ and collapse the polynomial hierarchy to $Σ_2^{\mathsf{P}}$. To our knowledge, the cyclic results answer Micciancio's questions of whether exact decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard on cyclic lattices and on a fixed family of cyclic lattices, even when restricted to full-rank principal cyclic ideals. Finally, under the coefficient embedding, we prove that exact decision-module-SIVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on free rank-two modules over the same cyclotomic rings.

cs.CC

Fooling Thresholds of Halfspaces

We initiate the study of constructing explicit pseudorandom generators for thresholds of halfspaces with seed length polylogarithmic in the number of halfspaces. This class of functions lies at the frontier of circuit complexity [CTW26]. We show that the generator designed by O'Donnell, Servedio, and Tan for polytopes [OST22] also fools this broader class. To analyze the generator, we develop a threshold-specific smooth approximation framework based on a Bentkus-type mollifier. We prove derivative bounds for this mollifier and also establish a Boolean anticoncentration theorem for thresholds of halfspaces via a random thinning argument. These ingredients imply that the generator $δ$-fools every $k$-out-of-$m$ threshold of $m$ halfspaces over $\{-1,1\}^n$ with seed length $\widetilde{O}(κ^{6+2\varepsilon}\log^{6+2\varepsilon}\!m\cdotδ^{-(2+2\varepsilon)}\log n)$, for any arbitrarily small constant $\varepsilon>0$, where $κ=\min\{k,m-k+1\}$. The random thinning argument also yields bounds on the noise sensitivity and Gaussian surface area for thresholds of halfspaces, leading to learning algorithms under both the uniform and Gaussian distributions.

cs.CC

An Oracle Separating Conjectures about Incompleteness in the Finite Domain

Pudlák [Pud17] lists several major conjectures from the field of proof complexity and asks for oracles that separate corresponding relativized conjectures. Among these conjectures are: - $\mathsf{DisjNP}$: The class of all disjoint NP-pairs does not have many-one complete elements. - $\mathsf{SAT}$: NP does not contain many-one complete sets that have P-optimal proof systems. - $\mathsf{UP}$: UP does not have many-one complete problems. - $\mathsf{NP}\cap\mathsf{coNP}$: $\text{NP}\cap\text{coNP}$ does not have many-one complete problems. As one answer to this question, we construct an oracle relative to which $\mathsf{DisjNP}$, $\neg \mathsf{SAT}$, $\mathsf{UP}$, and $\mathsf{NP}\cap\mathsf{coNP}$ hold, i.e., there is no relativizable proof for the implication $\mathsf{DisjNP}\wedge \mathsf{UP}\wedge \mathsf{NP}\cap\mathsf{coNP}\Rightarrow\mathsf{SAT}$. In particular, regarding the conjectures by Pudlák this extends a result by Khaniki [Kha19].

cs.CC