arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Ronald Katende

Publications and source records attributed to Ronald Katende.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Non-Asymptotic Variational Learning for Monotone Nonlinear Multiscale Elliptic Equations: Scale-Robust Primal-Dual Bounds and Strong-Form Statistical Ill-Conditioning

We develop a non-asymptotic approximation, sampling, and finite-iteration optimization theory for variational physics-informed approximation of uniformly monotone nonlinear multiscale elliptic equations. For boundary-compatible neural feature classes, the population error splits into approximation, empirical quadrature, and projected-gradient terms, with all non-approximation constants uniform in the microscopic scale \(\varepsilon\). Assuming a quantitative corrected \(H^1\)-estimate, a two-scale state class yields \[ \mathcal A_m^\varepsilon \le C\bigl(\varepsilon+Φ_{0,m_0}^2+Φ_{1,m_1}^2\bigr) \] in arbitrary dimension. We further introduce a convex primal-dual physics loss whose population value is a computable upper certificate for the state error. With additional flux-corrector regularity, a divergence-compatible two-scale flux class gives a certified state-flux bound combining \(O(\varepsilon)\) approximation, state and flux feature errors, empirical sampling error, and an \(O(K^{-1})\) optimization term. In contrast, for general periodic nonlinear fluxes satisfying a natural nondegeneracy condition, the empirical Rademacher complexities of strong-residual and squared-residual classes are bounded below by constant multiples of \((\varepsilon\sqrt N)^{-1}\) and \((\varepsilon^2\sqrt N)^{-1}\), respectively. These optimizer-independent lower bounds hold in every spatial dimension. Numerical experiments confirm the predicted \(\varepsilon\)- and \(N\)-scalings for nonlinear fluxes in \(d=1,2,3\), validate every computed primal-dual certificate, and show that corrector-enriched classes substantially reduce energy and \(H^1\) errors as the microscopic scale is refined.

math.NA

Contextual Fraction on Permutation Gain Graphs: Exact Algorithms, Query Lower Bounds, and Dynamic Maintenance

For an explicitly represented finite empirical model, deciding whether the contextual fraction is strictly below one is NP-complete, while the standard exact linear program has one column for every global assignment. We identify a permutation-transport class in which this global problem collapses to a fixed-point calculation. Let a connected permutation gain graph act on a finite state set $O$, let $H \leq{ \rm Sym}(O)$ be its holonomy subgroup, let $F = {\rm Fix}(H)$, and let $p$ be an $H$-invariant root distribution. For the induced empirical model, \[ {\rm NCF}(e)=p(F),\qquad {\rm CF}(e)=1-p(F). \] Consequently, compatibility, $F$, and ${\rm CF}(e)$ are computable in $O(|O|(|V|+|E|))$ arithmetic and table operations. For every finite simple $2$-edge-connected graph, any deterministic exact algorithm in the explicit permutation-table query model requires at least $(|O|-1)|E|$ probes in the worst case, making the dependence on the input tables optimal up to constant factors. With a fixed spanning tree, chord insertions and deletions require $O(|O|)$ worst-case time, or time proportional to the moved-set representation, while compatibility and contextual-fraction queries take $O(1)$ time. Finally, for common-marginal realizable binary constraint languages, the support threshold ${\rm CF} < 1$ is polynomial-time equivalent to the associated finite-domain constraint-satisfaction problem and therefore inherits the Bulatov--Zhuk dichotomy. The results identify a query-optimal and dynamically maintainable tractability island inside the general contextual-fraction problem.

cs.DS

Counterfactual Operator Relevance for PDE Discovery: Screening, Pruning, and Identifiability

We study operator relevance in data-driven partial differential equation (PDE) discovery. Sparse residual methods can select terms that improve residual fit, but residual contribution is not the same as functional necessity. We formalize this distinction through counterfactual operator interventions, where a candidate term is deleted or perturbed and the factual and intervened trajectories, or observables, are compared. The resulting theory gives six reusable results. A residual--counterfactual gap theorem shows that deletion effects are governed by the inverse linearized PDE map, not by residual magnitude alone. A certified decision theorem gives error margins for relevance, irrelevance, and abstention under neural or numerical surrogate error. An aliasing theorem characterizes experiment-dependent non-identifiability through the null space of the operator-evaluation design. A constraint-manifold theorem shows that operators vanishing on invariant constraint classes cannot be identified from trajectories restricted to those classes. A pruning-consistency theorem proves that sparse screening followed by counterfactual deletion recovers the functionally relevant support under a recall and margin condition. An observable-level adjoint theorem extends relevance testing from full-state deviations to scientific quantities of interest. Validation experiments test these mechanisms on synthetic PDEs with known support and on public geophysical fields from atmospheric reanalysis and NOAA OISST. The real-data results are reported as operator-surrogate diagnostics, not as unconditional recovery of physical laws. The framework provides a rigorous diagnostic layer for distinguishing residual usefulness from counterfactual operator relevance within a specified library, experiment class, norm, and tolerance.

cs.LG

Geometry as a Missing Axis of Representation Quality: The Variational Geometric Information Bottleneck under Data Scarcity

We study latent geometry as an explicit component of representation quality in data-scarce learning. For an encoder (ϕ), we define (Q_{β,γ}(ϕ)=I(ϕ(X);Y)-β\mathcal C(ϕ)-γd_{\mathrm{int}}(ϕ)), combining task-relevant information with penalties for curvature and intrinsic latent dimension. Thus geometry becomes part of the bottleneck criterion, not only a post hoc diagnostic. Under smooth-manifold, loss-transfer, and estimator-concentration assumptions, we derive non-asymptotic low-label generalization bounds where intrinsic dimension and covering complexity enter explicitly. We characterize the information--geometry frontier and prove empirical-surrogate consistency. The analysis links encoder geometry to learning through latent covering numbers, loss-class entropy, and uniform deviation. We instantiate the theory as \texttt{V-GIB}, adding curvature and dimension penalties to variational bottleneck training. Real low-label benchmarks compare \texttt{V-GIB} with ERM, VIB, and ablations across (1%)--(20%) label fractions. Results show improved performance and reduced geometric complexity in several regimes, especially FashionMNIST and CIFAR-10, while confirming that no fixed regularizer is universally dominant.

cs.LG

Physics-Informed Residuals for Adaptive Mesh Refinement in Finite-Difference PDE Solvers

Classical finite-difference solvers remain reliable tools for partial differential equations, but their efficiency depends on where mesh resolution is placed. Uniform refinement can waste degrees of freedom when solution difficulty is localised near sharp gradients, fronts, oscillations, or constraint-sensitive regions. This paper studies a hybrid strategy in which a physics-informed neural network (PINN) is used not as the final solver, but as an off-grid residual probe for adaptive mesh refinement. The PINN residual is sampled over the domain, converted into cellwise indicators, and used to guide refinement before the final approximation is computed by a finite-difference solver. The method is evaluated on three benchmarks. The main full-solver validation uses the one-dimensional viscous Burgers equation with a nonuniform finite-difference solve on the adapted meshes. PINN-threshold refinement attains final relative $L^2$ error $0.021067$ with $60$ degrees of freedom, compared with $0.022617$ for uniform refinement with $192$ degrees of freedom. At matched mesh size, PINN-threshold reduces the error by about $67.5\%$. PINN-Dörfler refinement gives similar performance, with error $0.021264$ using $58$ degrees of freedom. A gradient indicator remains slightly more accurate, so the result supports usefulness rather than universal superiority. Manufactured 2D and 3D proxy tests, based on a nonlinear Schrödinger equation and an incompressible Navier--Stokes system, show that PINN residuals can organise structured refinement and improve over random refinement, although they do not consistently outperform gradient or uniform baselines. The results support PINN-guided AMR as a residual-indicator strategy for transferring physics-informed diagnostic information into finite-difference mesh adaptation while preserving the classical solver as the final approximation engine.

math.NA

No-Harm Physics-Informed Inverse Learning with Residual-Calibrated Uncertainty

Physics-informed learning is increasingly used for partial differential equation (PDE)-governed inverse problems, but its reliability remains difficult to certify. This paper develops a no-harm certification-and-selection framework for physics-informed inverse learning. A learned reconstruction is accepted only when its residual-calibrated radius is no worse than the baseline radius, namely when $$R_{\mathrm{learn}}\le R_{\mathrm{base}}+\varepsilon_{\mathrm{safe}};$$otherwise, the method returns the baseline. The certificate combines data, physics, boundary or initial-condition, and optimization residuals. Under a conditional stability estimate, these residuals yield an a posteriori reconstruction-error bound and a deterministic uncertainty radius. A high-probability certificate is also derived for physics residuals estimated from independent random collocation points. Numerical tests on Poisson source recovery, inverse heat reconstruction, limited-angle tomography, elliptic coefficient identification, and stochastic residual validation show that the selector accepts certified improvements, rejects shifted, hallucinated, or unfinished candidates, and becomes conservative in strongly ill-posed regimes. The framework is therefore a certification-and-selection layer, not another reconstruction architecture.

math.NA

A Learning Stability Profile for Finite-Dimensional Learning Dynamics

We develop a finite-dimensional sensitivity framework for studying stability in learning systems whose states include representations, parameters, and update variables. The central object is the \emph{Learning Stability Profile}, a collection of directional sensitivity operators that records how perturbations in inputs, parameter initialization, and update mechanisms propagate along a specified learning trajectory. The main result is a Lyapunov criterion for controlling this profile. Under explicit regularity, coercivity, and dissipation assumptions, an incremental Lyapunov energy yields uniform or exponentially decaying bounds on the associated linearized transition operators. The result is stated as a sufficient stability criterion, not as an unconditional converse theorem. The framework also distinguishes terminal decay, profile-wise boundedness, and subexponential growth, avoiding the identification of nonpositive growth exponents with uniform boundedness. The profile is then specialized to several standard learning mechanisms. Spectral bounds give forward sensitivity estimates for feedforward networks. Dissipativity and step-size restrictions give stability bounds for residual architectures. Mean-square contraction assumptions yield parameter and update sensitivity bounds for stochastic gradient methods. Locally Lipschitz systems, including piecewise-linear networks, proximal maps, projected updates, and recurrent or state-space recursions, are handled through Clarke generalized Jacobians and variational Lyapunov inequalities. The resulting framework provides a common stability language for architecture, optimization, stochasticity, and nonsmoothness. Its role is structural: it organizes known stability mechanisms within one perturbation calculus while keeping the hypotheses needed for each guarantee explicit.

cs.LG

Core-Conditioned Regularized Matrix Tri-Factorization for High-Dimensional Structured Systems

This paper studies a regularized matrix tri-factorization \(A\approx PDQ\), where \(P\) and \(Q\) are side factors and \(D\) is a central core whose conditioning can be explicitly regularized or constrained. The formulation is a structured low-rank approximation framework, not a replacement for LU, QR, Cholesky, or the singular value decomposition. In the unregularized full-data Frobenius rank-\(r\) problem, truncated SVD remains the optimal benchmark. The contribution here concerns the regularized and core-conditioned setting, where reconstruction accuracy is treated together with factor scale, numerical conditioning, perturbation behavior, and weighted approximation. The analysis establishes the algebraic scope of the \(PDQ\) representation, proves existence of minimizers under coercive regularization, identifies the non-uniqueness induced by latent-space transformations, derives well-posed block updates for the quadratic full-data objective, and gives product-level perturbation bounds. For exact alternating minimization in the full-data quadratic case, it proves descent, boundedness of iterates, and convergence to a critical point under standard Kurdyka--Łojasiewicz assumptions. A full multi-seed validation indicates competitive behavior in noisy and ill-conditioned low-rank approximation while reporting diagnostics not provided by purely spectral baselines, including the learned core condition number and block-system conditioning. The validation also clarifies the method's limits: randomized SVD remains faster for pure spectral compression, and the current weighted missing-entry variant is not uniformly competitive with matrix-completion baselines. The framework is therefore best viewed as a regularized and diagnostically transparent tri-factorization for settings where approximation quality and numerical conditioning must be controlled jointly.

math.NA

A Function-Space Stability Boundary for Generalization in Interpolating Learning Systems

Modern learning systems often interpolate training data while still generalizing well, yet it remains unclear when algorithmic stability explains this behavior. We model training as a function-space trajectory and measure sensitivity to single-sample perturbations along this trajectory. We propose a contractive propagation condition and a stability certificate obtained by unrolling the resulting recursion. A small certificate implies stability-based generalization, while we also prove that there exist interpolating regimes with small risk where such contractive sensitivity cannot hold, showing that stability is not a universal explanation. Experiments confirm that certificate growth predicts generalization differences across optimizers, step sizes, and dataset perturbations. The framework therefore identifies regimes where stability explains generalization and where alternative mechanisms must account for success.

cs.LG

A Unified Matrix-Spectral Framework for Stability and Interpretability in Deep Learning

We develop a unified matrix-spectral framework for analyzing stability and interpretability in deep neural networks. Representing networks as data-dependent products of linear operators reveals spectral quantities governing sensitivity to input perturbations, label noise, and training dynamics. We introduce a Global Matrix Stability Index that aggregates spectral information from Jacobians, parameter gradients, Neural Tangent Kernel operators, and loss Hessians into a single stability scale controlling forward sensitivity, attribution robustness, and optimization conditioning. We further show that spectral entropy refines classical operator-norm bounds by capturing typical, rather than purely worst-case, sensitivity. These quantities yield computable diagnostics and stability-oriented regularization principles. Synthetic experiments and controlled studies on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 confirm that modest spectral regularization substantially improves attribution stability even when global spectral summaries change little. The results establish a precise connection between spectral concentration and analytic stability, providing practical guidance for robustness-aware model design and training.

cs.LG

Why Smooth Stability Assumptions Fail for ReLU Learning

Stability analyses of modern learning systems are frequently derived under smoothness assumptions that are violated by ReLU-type nonlinearities. In this note, we isolate a minimal obstruction by showing that no uniform smoothness-based stability proxy such as gradient Lipschitzness or Hessian control can hold globally for ReLU networks, even in simple settings where training trajectories appear empirically stable. We give a concrete counterexample demonstrating the failure of classical stability bounds and identify a minimal generalized derivative condition under which stability statements can be meaningfully restored. The result clarifies why smooth approximations of ReLU can be misleading and motivates nonsmooth-aware stability frameworks.

cs.LG

A Frobenius-Optimal Projection for Enforcing Linear Conservation in Learned Dynamical Models

We consider the problem of restoring linear conservation laws in data-driven linear dynamical models. Given a learned operator $\widehat{A}$ and a full-rank constraint matrix $C$ encoding one or more invariants, we show that the matrix closest to $\widehat{A}$ in the Frobenius norm and satisfying $C^\top A = 0$ is the orthogonal projection $A^\star = \widehat{A} - C(C^\top C)^{-1}C^\top \widehat{A}$. This correction is uniquely defined, low rank and fully determined by the violation $C^\top \widehat{A}$. In the single-invariant case it reduces to a rank-one update. We prove that $A^\star$ enforces exact conservation while minimally perturbing the dynamics, and we verify these properties numerically on a Markov-type example. The projection provides an elementary and general mechanism for embedding exact invariants into any learned linear model.

math.DS

Interpretive Efficiency: Information-Geometric Foundations of Data Usefulness

Interpretability is central to trustworthy machine learning, yet existing metrics rarely quantify how effectively data support an interpretive representation. We propose Interpretive Efficiency, a normalized, task-aware functional that measures the fraction of task-relevant information transmitted through an interpretive channel. The definition is grounded in five axioms ensuring boundedness, Blackwell-style monotonicity, data-processing stability, admissible invariance, and asymptotic consistency. We relate the functional to mutual information and derive a local Fisher-geometric expansion, then establish asymptotic and finite-sample estimation guarantees using standard empirical-process tools. Experiments on controlled image and signal tasks demonstrate that the measure recovers theoretical orderings, exposes representational redundancy masked by accuracy, and correlates with robustness, making it a practical, theory-backed diagnostic for representation design.

cs.LG

Preserving Extreme Singular Values with One Oblivious Sketch

We study when a single linear sketch can control the largest and smallest nonzero singular values of every rank-$r$ matrix. Classical oblivious embeddings require $s=Θ(r/\varepsilon^{2})$ for $(1\pm\varepsilon)$ distortion, but this does not yield constant-factor control of extreme singular values or condition numbers. We formalize a conjecture that $s=O(r\log r)$ suffices for such preservation. On the constructive side, we show that combining a sparse oblivious sketch with a deterministic geometric balancing map produces a sketch whose nonzero singular values collapse to a common scale under bounded condition number and coherence. On the negative side, we prove that any oblivious sketch achieving relative $\varepsilon$-accurate singular values for all rank-$r$ matrices must satisfy $s=Ω((r+\log(1/δ))/\varepsilon^{2})$. Numerical experiments on structured matrix families confirm that balancing improves conditioning and accelerates iterative solvers, while coherent or nearly rank-deficient inputs manifest the predicted failure modes.

math.NA

Curvature-Adaptive Perturbation and Subspace Descent for Robust Saddle Point Escape in High-Dimensional Optimization

High-dimensional non-convex optimization problems in engineering design, control, and learning are often hindered by saddle points, flat plateaus, and strongly anisotropic curvature. This paper develops a unified, curvature-adaptive framework that combines stochastic perturbations, adaptive learning rates, and randomized subspace descent to enhance escape efficiency and scalability. We show theoretically that gradient flow almost surely avoids strict saddles, with escape probability increasing exponentially in dimension. For noise-perturbed gradient descent, we derive explicit escape-time bounds that depend on local curvature and noise magnitude. Adaptive step sizes further reduce escape times by responding to local gradient variability, while randomized subspace descent preserves descent directions in low-dimensional projections and ensures global convergence with logarithmic dependence on dimension. Numerical experiments on nonlinear and constrained benchmarks validate these results, demonstrating faster escape, improved robustness to ill-conditioning, and lower total runtime compared to standard first- and second-order methods. The proposed approach offers practical tools for large-scale engineering optimization tasks where curvature, noise, and dimensionality interplay critically.

math.OC

Non-Asymptotic Stability and Consistency Guarantees for Physics-Informed Neural Networks via Coercive Operator Analysis

We present a unified theoretical framework for analyzing the stability and consistency of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), grounded in operator coercivity, variational formulations, and non-asymptotic perturbation theory. PINNs approximate solutions to partial differential equations (PDEs) by minimizing residual losses over sampled collocation and boundary points. We formalize both operator-level and variational notions of consistency, proving that residual minimization in Sobolev norms leads to convergence in energy and uniform norms under mild regularity. Deterministic stability bounds quantify how bounded perturbations to the network outputs propagate through the full composite loss, while probabilistic concentration results via McDiarmid's inequality yield sample complexity guarantees for residual-based generalization. A unified generalization bound links residual consistency, projection error, and perturbation sensitivity. Empirical results on elliptic, parabolic, and nonlinear PDEs confirm the predictive accuracy of our theoretical bounds across regimes. The framework identifies key structural principles, such as operator coercivity, activation smoothness, and sampling admissibility, that underlie robust and generalizable PINN training, offering principled guidance for the design and analysis of PDE-informed learning systems.

cs.LG

Structured Variational $D$-Decomposition for Accurate and Stable Low-Rank Approximation

We introduce the $D$-decomposition, a non-orthogonal matrix factorization of the form $A \approx P D Q$, where $P \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times k}$, $D \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times k}$, and $Q \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times n}$. The decomposition is defined variationally by minimizing a regularized Frobenius loss, allowing control over rank, sparsity, and conditioning. Unlike algebraic factorizations such as LU or SVD, it is computed by alternating minimization. We establish existence and perturbation stability of the solution and show that each update has complexity $\mathcal{O}(n^2k)$. Benchmarks against truncated SVD, CUR, and nonnegative matrix factorization show improved reconstruction accuracy on MovieLens, MNIST, Olivetti Faces, and gene expression matrices, particularly under sparsity and noise.

math.NA

Unified theoretical guarantees for stability, consistency, and convergence in neural PDE solvers from non-IID data to physics-informed networks

We establish a unified theoretical framework addressing the stability, consistency, and convergence of neural networks under realistic training conditions, specifically, in the presence of non-IID data, geometric constraints, and embedded physical laws. For standard supervised learning with dependent data, we derive uniform stability bounds for gradient-based methods using mixing coefficients and dynamic learning rates. In federated learning with heterogeneous data and non-Euclidean parameter spaces, we quantify model inconsistency via curvature-aware aggregation and information-theoretic divergence. For Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), we rigorously prove perturbation stability, residual consistency, Sobolev convergence, energy stability for conservation laws, and convergence under adaptive multi-domain refinements. Each result is grounded in variational analysis, compactness arguments, and universal approximation theorems in Sobolev spaces. Our theoretical guarantees are validated across parabolic, elliptic, and hyperbolic PDEs, confirming that residual minimization aligns with physical solution accuracy. This work offers a mathematically principled basis for designing robust, generalizable, and physically coherent neural architectures across diverse learning environments.

cs.LG