arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.16787

Nested Parallel von Neumann Architecture and Nested BSP

Abstract

Large-scale AI computing is no longer a contest of ''one stronger processor,'' but of how an army of processors under one command can still be one computer. This paper offers two interlocking extensions. First, extend BSP to Nested BSP. The Turing machine describes computation as a single tape, in sequence. A million processors need not a longer tape, but a battle plan nested layer within layer: at every layer, parallel work, barrier, exchange and aggregate, then the next phase. Every ``parallel advance'' inside a layer repeats the same four steps. Nested BSP extends classic BSP by nesting it recursively, a computing paradigm for million-scale parallelism, under one rule: every node at every layer is a peer. Second, extend von Neumann to the Nested Parallel von Neumann Architecture, and Unified Bus is its interconnect. Von Neumann taught us how to build one stored-program computer. The false extrapolation of eighty years was that wiring many computers into a network yields one larger computer. A second habit ran deeper: nearly every design assumes a master that commands and slaves that obey---host over device, CPU over accelerator, center over edge. The Nested Parallel Architecture extends that idea rather than discarding it. Two nesting dolls must fit: Nested BSP in software, and the Nested Parallel von Neumann Architecture from package to autonomous zone, joined by one memory-semantic bus end to end, with full peer equality: physically sparse, logically tight. It pairs with Huawei's $τ$ Scaling law: $τ$ governs how each layer folds time, while the Architecture governs how the nested parallel computer stands, layer by layer, peer by peer. In summary, the paper extends BSP to Nested BSP and extends von Neumann to the Nested Parallel von Neumann Architecture. $τ$ folds time, peer-equal parallelism nests layer by layer---many processors, still one computer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Heng Liao. 2026-09-15. Nested Parallel von Neumann Architecture and Nested BSP. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16787

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Reforge: Low-Latency Distributed GNN Serving with Selective Embedding Recomputation

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely adopted for their ability to compute expressive node representations in graph datasets. However, serving GNNs on large graphs is challenging due to the high communication, computation, and memory overheads of constructing and executing computation graphs, which represent information flow across large neighborhoods. Existing approximation techniques in training can mitigate the overheads but, in serving, still lead to high latency and/or accuracy loss. To this end, we propose Reforge, a system that enables low-latency GNN serving for large graphs with minimal accuracy loss through two key ideas. First, Reforge employs selective recomputation of precomputed embeddings, which allows for reusing precomputed computation subgraphs while selectively recomputing a small fraction to minimize accuracy loss. Second, we develop computation graph parallelism, which reduces communication overhead by parallelizing the creation and execution of computation graphs across machines. Our evaluation with large graph datasets and GNN models shows that Reforge significantly outperforms state-of-the-art techniques.

cs.DC

Agentic AI Workload Characteristics

Agentic AI shifts LLM serving from isolated prompt-generation requests to stateful, multi-turn executions that repeatedly invoke the model, call tools, and grow context over time. This paper characterizes ReAct-style agents from both the LLM-serving and tool-execution perspectives using an end-to-end tracing infrastructure across reasoning and non-reasoning Gemma and Qwen configurations on five agentic benchmarks. Our study shows that agentic workloads are not simply long-prompt workloads: with effective context caching, most input tokens are reused across turns, making execution decode-dominated while increasing dependence on long-lived KV-cache state. We also find that tool use has a clear temporal structure, with agents shifting from read/explore behavior early in execution to execute/write behavior later. These results show that efficient agentic serving must jointly manage repeated model re-entry, persistent context state, and workload-dependent tool behavior.

cs.DC

Byzantine Causal Reliable Broadcast (BCRB) with Constant-Size Message Metadata

Asynchronous Byzantine Reliable Broadcast (BRB) is a fundamental primitive that guarantees agreement and validity in distributed systems subject to Byzantine faults, but it lacks ordering guarantees. In this paper, we address Byzantine Causal Reliable Broadcast (BCRB), which builds on BRB to enforce causal message ordering. We present a novel BCRB protocol that decouples causal ordering from the BRB layer, achieving constant-size $\mathcal{O}(1)$ message metadata overhead and $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ communication word complexity as against $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ communication word complexity of existing protocols; here $n$ is the number of processes. We present two variants of our protocol: a cryptographic version using a threshold encryption scheme and sequence gating, and its non-cryptographic version. In the cryptographic version, senders broadcast ciphertexts immediately, and decryption shares are piggybacked on out-of-band ACKs, preventing early decryption and front-running. In both versions, causal safety is achieved probabilistically. We evaluate the probability of causal safety violations using a random variable path analysis under independent exponential link delay distributions. We show that both variants satisfy liveness and the probability of weak safety violation is bounded by $\mathcal{O}(f^{-3}\cdot\ln^3 f)$, where $f$ is the upper bound on the number of Byzantine processes, and $f < n/3$ and $f=\mathcal{O}(n)$. Further, for the crypto version, we show that the probability of strong safety violation is bounded by $\mathcal{O}(f^{-1} \cdot \ln^2 f)$. We also show how to modify our two protocols to guarantee 100\% weak safety keeping $\mathcal{O}(1)$ message space overhead but with $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ messages and $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ communication word complexity.

cs.DC