arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.01948

An Emerging NVM-Based On-Chip Training Architecture with Non-Ideality Mitigation Through Bipolar Weight Distributions

Abstract

The rapid advancement of deep learning has presented significant energy efficiency challenges to the conventional von Neumann architecture. In-memory computing (IMC) architectures based on emerging non-volatile memory (eNVM) are widely regarded as a promising solution for accelerating neural network training due to their high parallelism and low power consumption. However, the intrinsic non-idealities of eNVM devices can cause conductance updates to deviate from target values, thereby limiting the performance of on-chip training. To address this challenge, this paper presents a Non-ideality Optimized eNVM Accelerator (NOVA) architecture for on-chip training. Specifically, we first fabricate a two-dimensional (2D) ferroelectric field-effect transistor (FeFET) and develop a conductance modulation behavioral model calibrated with experimental data. Building upon this device model, we propose, for the first time, a Non-ideality Avoidance Training (NAT) algorithm tailored for eNVM devices, which mitigates accuracy degradation by guiding weight convergence toward the most stable conductance regions of eNVM devices. Experimental results demonstrate that, even under severe device asymmetry, NAT improves the accuracy by an average of 15.1\% over the baseline methods across multiple benchmark tasks. Meanwhile, the NOVA achieves an average energy efficiency gain of approximately 33.58$\times$ compared with the peak energy efficiency of graphics processing units (GPUs).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Peng Dang, Youna Huang, Yintao He, Huawei Li. 2026-09-01. An Emerging NVM-Based On-Chip Training Architecture with Non-Ideality Mitigation Through Bipolar Weight Distributions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01948

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are Widely Known Findings Easier to Retract?

Failures of retraction are common in science. Why do they occur? And what determines whether a retraction is successful? We use data from citation records and Altmetrics to test proposed answers to these questions. LaCroix et al. employ network models to argue the social spread of information helps explain failures of retraction. One prediction is that widely known results, surprisingly, should be easier to retract, since their retraction is more relevant. Our results support this conclusion. We find highly cited papers show more significant reductions in citation after retraction and garner more attention to their retractions as they occur.

cs.DL

Are We There Yet? Assessing Computer-Use Agents for Blind Users' Accessible Interaction with Desktop Applications

Computer-use agents are emerging as a paradigm for agentic human-AI interaction, combining language reasoning with multi-modal interface grounding to operate GUIs. Yet their effectiveness for blind screen-reader users in real-world desktop workflows remains unclear. We present a three-week diary study with 8 blind users using OLLA, a screen-reader-accessible CUA prototype, collecting 1,258 commands across 12 applications with screenshots, UI trees, model responses, and action traces. We evaluate GPT-5 during deployment and re-execute the same commands with four additional models. GPT-5 achieved the highest success rate at 52.5%. Trace analysis reveals grounding, planning, constraint-tracking, and termination failures, while interviews reveal beyond-automation needs.

cs.HC

Self-Reports Are Not Verification: Environment-Grounded Auditing of LLM Operators in Evolutionary Search

Language model agents increasingly propose actions, observe external feedback, and explain their own behavior. Their confidence and rationales are convenient monitoring signals, but convenience is not verification. We introduce an environment-grounded audit in which every intermediate proposal receives an exact outcome. A language model operates an evolutionary Contexto search whose feedback function assigns every valid guess an exact rank without human annotation. Across 200 runs spanning five configurations and three model families, four reporting configurations produce 12,249 self-reports. We test three assumptions: stated confidence is calibrated, inherited rationales affect later proposals, and fitness-based selection improves report quality. All three fail. Operators overstate top-100 success by factors of 4.8 to 9.3, while calibration and discrimination dissociate across model families. Controlled interventions on 754 inherited rationales bound any measured benefit of the genuine rationale to roughly 250 ranks. Neither fitness-based nor random selection produces a detectable selection differential or parent-to-offspring transmission in report accuracy, despite sharply different search behavior. Agent self-reports should therefore be treated as claims to verify against the environment, not as evidence of their own reliability.

cs.AI