arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.28433

Prove2Me: An Open Collaborative Platform for Scaling Math Formalization

Shuze Chen·Kunal Marwaha·Xiaoyang Lu·Henry Yuen·Tianyi Peng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Proof assistants such as Lean 4 promise the paradigm of formally verified mathematics, but large-scale formalization projects have faced major barriers to entry, including the need for expertise in formal verification (as well as the underlying mathematics) and the significant time required for writing formal proofs. AI coding agents have dramatically reduced these barriers; human users can now use natural language to prompt agents to write complex proofs in Lean. This opens up the intriguing possibility of internet-scale mathematical collaboration involving both humans and AI agents, where correctness is machine-checked. To realize this possibility, we introduce Prove2Me (https://prove2.me), an open collaborative platform for formalizing mathematics. Users launch formalization "missions", to which AI agents contribute formal proofs toward completion. We designed mechanisms and a specialized harness in Prove2Me that enable large-scale collaboration so that agents can build on one another's work and freely reuse existing results. In doing so, Prove2Me aims to turn math formalization into a scalable, crowd-sourced effort open to anyone with an agent.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.LOcs.MA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shuze Chen, Kunal Marwaha, Xiaoyang Lu, Henry Yuen, Tianyi Peng. 2026-08-31. Prove2Me: An Open Collaborative Platform for Scaling Math Formalization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28433

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.LO subjectcs.MA subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Implementing Grassroots Logic Programs with Multiagent Transition Systems and AI (Full Version)

Grassroots Logic Programs (GLP) is a concurrent logic programming language in which logic variables are partitioned into paired readers and writers. An assignment is produced at most once via a writer and consumed at most once via its paired reader, and may contain additional readers and/or writers. This enables the concise expression of rich multidirectional communication modalities. The language was introduced together with concurrent (cGLP) and multiagent (maGLP) operational semantics. Here, we derive from these (1) dGLP, a deterministic counterpart of cGLP, and (2) madGLP, a counterpart of maGLP in which deterministic agents communicate solely by asynchronous message passing, and prove them correct against their abstract counterparts. maGLP shared variable pairs spanning agents can be implemented by two local variable pairs joined by a \emph{global link}, with correctness following from disjoint substitution commutativity (a consequence of GLP's single-occurrence invariant). We further prove that madGLP is grassroots. Both dGLP and madGLP serve as formal specifications for an AI-driven implementation discipline (math $\to$ informal spec $\to$ Dart) employed and described here: from dGLP, AI (Claude) developed a workstation-based GLP implementation in Dart, and from madGLP it is developing a smartphone-based multiagent one.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

A categorical formulation of Kraus' paradox

We give a categorical formulation of Kraus' "magic trick" for recovering information from truncated types. Rather than type theory, we work in Van den Berg-Moerdijk path categories with a univalent universe, and rather than propositional truncation we work with arbitrary cofibrations, which includes truncation as a special case. We show, using Kraus' argument that any cofibration with homogeneous domain is a monomorphism. We give some simple concrete examples in groupoids to illustrate the interaction between homogeneous types, cofibrations and univalent fibrations.

math.CT↗
arXiv2026

Quantified propositional calculi and narrow implicit proofs

In the implicit version of a propositional proof system Q, we work with Q-proofs that are not written down directly, but are succinctly encoded by circuits. Thus implicit Q-proofs are potentially exponentially shorter than usual Q-proofs. We study narrow implicit proofs, a restricted version of this notion, in which lines in the encoded proof can only have polynomial size. We use a cut-elimination construction to show that G_{i+1} is equivalent to narrow implicit G_i, for i >= 1, where G_i is the extension of Frege allowing reasoning with Sigma^q_i quantified propositional formulas. We show that G_1 is equivalent to implicit resolution.

cs.LO↗